In the end I think it's more the result of rude people thinking they are entitled than Disney dropping their standards.
Disney cutting park hours, closing attractions without replacement, deferring needed maintenance, eliminating parade and Fantasmic performances, and raising prices on reduced quality food and merchandise - to name but five examples - objectively show that Disney has indeed dropped their own standards. It has nothing to do with anyone's personal expectations, demands, or feelings of entitlement when customer unfriendly decisions are made solely in the interest of saving money. It is not completely impossible, perhaps, that you could have found an example of peeling paint somewhere in the Magic Kingdom or
Disneyland thirty years ago, but it would have been repainted as a routine matter. It is in the last decade, however, that we have examples of such once routine maintenance being neglected for so long that the wood rots away, and the structure has to be rebuilt or demolished.
Rude people feeling entitled didn't cause Disney to design and build a mistaken theme park that made more money as a parking lot (DCA); Adherence to Disney's own standards would have eliminated the need to now spend $1 billion to address the park's most serious shortcomings. The existence of online forums may give people a place to discuss such matters in detail, but such discussion (or complaining, or unjustified "whining") does not cause the problem - it stems from it. Nor do rude, demanding guests explain why many recent upgraded attractions have been inferior (Journey into Imagination, Stitch, etc.) to the rides/shows they replaced. Sure, when you produce inferior work, be it an attraction, movie, book, or whatever, it's easy just to blame the audience when it bombs, but that doesn't excuse the lack of creativity and effort that went into producing such lackluster results.
more people means more complaints
Only in total numbers,which are meaningless to judge how what your audience/customers think of your product/service. If you run a restaurant and have 1% of your diners complain their food is cold, maybe that's an expected number. Problems happen, somebody may want something free, or whatever. You make it right for that 1% and go on. But if 20-30% or so of everyone dining starts to comment about how their meals seem to have just come out of the freezer, you've got a real problem, and blaming the customers won't make it go away. Ironically it will, though, make your customers go away. Hmm.....what Orlando theme=park operator has resorted to larger and more frequent discounts to try to keep its (overbuilt) resort hotels occupied?
what ws MS, Horizons? go back and look at the videos on you tube. there's no way that ride would work today.. you'd be online complaining about how lame, outdated, and boring it was.
Things have to change and Disney is good at recongizing that.
If they didn't they wouldn't be the top of the industry they are now.
Epcot - particularly Future World - was allowed to become stale. It shouldn't have been a surprise that an attraction about the future might need updating regularly. It absolutely did not need to be bulldozed, It needed a rehab and update like Spaceship Earth and Living with the Land have recieved. If you believe it wouldn't work today, then how do you explain the continued success of the Haunted Mansion, Pirates of the Caribbean, Space Mountain, It's a Small World, and Spaceship Earth (among others). All have undergone incremental improvements over the years (often not enough, but I digress) to keep things fresh - Horizons essentially sat untouched for almost two decades. Again, the subject matter of the attraction needed attention more often than these other examples. There are some problems with the latest update to Spaceship Earth, but the attraction endures, and so should have Horizons.
Finally, Epcot Center's success was built upon attractions like Horizons, the World of Motion, and Journey into Imagination. Two of those were replaced with thrill rides, which to an extent alienated Epcot's core audience (if you loved the slow omnimover experience of Horizons, Mission Space may not be your cup of tea, and vice-versa). Imagination needed attention, but a rehab which built upon and enhanced the existing attraction. Demolishing an expensive ride and replacing it with a cheaper (shorter) alternative defies logic, even if you only consider it from a "business" perspective (ie., what's the most cost-effective way to update the ride to maintain its popularity, etc.), which Disney does, often with disappointing results.
And hey I admit disney isn't perfect but it's sure alot better than some people (not naming anyone specific) here on the dis make it out to be.
Just most places don't have the dis or places like to to read about it
endlessly.
When you can do that, you'll more likely here the bad before the good.
But Disney's good is still the best out there and the best value for my money.
There are more things than I could possibly list that Disney still does very well or even exceptionally. There is nothing else even remotely like Disney - it is truly something special, with a remarkable and unique history for a company which once knew no bounds. That's
exactly why we harp on the problems so much. The decline in standards doesn't at all mean we don't love the place; Just the opposite, and probably too much sometimes, which is why it is so hard to see the direction the place is headed (ultimately circling the toilet). Just how far we are from that point is certainly debatable, but the fact that there has been a steep and worsening decline is objective fact. In short, I love Disney and especially Walt Disney World, I loath what the company has or is becoming.