Not a pleasant subject, Dolphin Swims

ClarabelleCow

Where did my tag go? Oh fairy, can you help me?
Joined
Aug 7, 2002
Messages
2,437
I know I won't make any friends stating this, but on some of the islands, there are several groups trying to ban these places. I personally did the dolphin encounter while in Nassau or Freeport several years ago, I really didn't think much of it, because they could come and go, or that's how I understood it!!! Here is some interesting information regarding what's been going on. I'm not trying to make anyone feel funny about these Dolphin Encounters, just a heads up as to what is going on behind the scenes to stop it.


The Daily Observer,Wednesday February 25,2004

ANTIGUA WEST INDIES

Page 9

ABITPC Scores Victory In Dolphin Salvo; Pressing On For More

By Joanne C.Hillhouse

The decision to rescind permission given for the capture of 12 dolphins a year in Antigua & Barbuda ’s waters,previously

reported in The DailyOBSERVER,has been confirmed.The Antigua & Barbuda Independent Tourism Promotion Corporation

(ABITPC)is in receipt of said decision.It reads:"Cabinet at a meeting held on Wednesday 11th February 2004 reconsidered

its decision of 20th December 2000 and decided as follows: That the permission granted to Mr.John Mezzanotte to capture

twelve (12)dolphins annually from Antigua waters is hereby revoked;That any importation or exportation of dolphins into or

from Antigua and Barbuda be in strict compliance with all international obligations of Antigua and Barbuda." This

communication is dated February 23, 2004 and is signed by the Cabinet Secretary Lounel Stevens and copied to the

Permanent Secretary in the Ministry of Agriculture, Lands and Fisheries Winston Burleigh. Though the environmental

lobby has hailed this as a victory for dolphins,they ’ve indicated

Continued on page 10



ABITPC is contending that the dolphins in captivity for the swim with

programme at Dolphin Fantaseas in Antigua should be free like this

duo pictured here. (photo of free dolphins)



From page 9

that it does not necessarily mean that the case brought by ABITPC against govern-

ment and Dolphin Fantaseas will simply go away.They argue that there is still the matter of the dolphins already in captivity,

as part of Dolphin Fantaseas ’ ‘Swim with the Dolphins ’ programme,,to consider. News of the groundbreaking case broke

late last year,after a letter sent by ABITPC to Prime Minister Lester Bird failed to provoke any action.

They argued,at that time,that Antigua was in violation of several treaties and believe that their action forced the

government ’s hand.

"Before we actually took legal action,we wrote a letter to the prime minister demanding that the permission be rescinded," said

ABITPC spokesperson Martha Watkins-Gilkes, speaking to this publication on Tuesday,February 24, "not even an

acknowledgement.So,when that was not forthcoming,we then pursued legal action.And I think that now that we have

pointed out so clearly in the press all the international treaties that Antigua is in violation of with this protect,that they

obviously know that they ’re going to lose the case."

That said though, Watkins-Gilkes said she is surprised at this early victory. "I thought that we

would have to go to court, and,in fact,we may still go with some legal action," she said."I ’m waiting to hear

from our lawyer on that. "The importation of the dolphins currently in captivity is,she indicated,a violation of the

Convention on International Trade of Endangered Species (CITES)."We do wish to pursue the fact that they

were brought in illegally in violation with that CITES agreement," Watkins--Gilkes said."(That issue)is not in

here (the Cabinet decision) at all,the issue of the dolphins that have been imported in violation of

CITES."

But,with that battle still to be fought,ABITPC is still in a celebratory mood

from all indications. Apress release quoted Watkins-Gilkes as saying,"ABITPC is delighted that this long,drawn-out

debate,which has been very time consuming,mentally and financially draining,has come to a close and that justice has

trumpeted. We are pleased that the environment of Antigua & Barbuda will not be compromised by the removal of

our wild dolphins.We feel, and I have stated from the start of this saga,that the government was sold a dirty and misleading

"bill of goods " from foreigners who came to our island and want to exploit our marine resources for their own per-

sonal financial gain with very little in it for Antigua & Barbuda. "In a public debate held with the managing

director Arthur Bud Krames,before the project opened,he stated they would employ over 20

Antiguans.I would like to ask how many Antiguans are employed some two years later."

The release concluded:"It is hoped that this case will have a positive impact throughout the

Caribbean islands,in that the governments of these islands will be forced to act responsibly to the citizens

of their respective country in the upholding of any international environmental treaty they are party to."

More on the topic

.S. probes Cuban dolphin deals


Purchases of sea creatures could have violated the embargo

By Charles D. Sherman/ csherman@herald.com. Posted on Sun, Feb. 17, 2002 in The Miami Herald

MEADS BAY, Anguilla -- The U.S. Treasury office that enforces the trade embargo on Cuba is investigating whether Americans have bought hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of dolphins from the Cuban government, a main supplier of the animals for proliferating tourist attractions in the Caribbean.

''There is an open investigation,'' said Robert Fernández, special agent in charge at U.S. Customs in Puerto Rico. "If there's a U.S. citizen, U.S. resident or U.S. entity involved, it would be a violation.''

Animal rights activists who closely follow the investigation say U.S. agents are tightly focused on two dolphin parks set up by Americans on Anguilla and Antigua, high-end resorts in the Leeward Islands east of Puerto Rico.

From Anguilla with its lavish $1,000-a-night hotel rooms to the bargain resorts on the Gulf coast of Mexico, the Caribbean now has more than 30 dolphin parks, opened mostly since 1990. Customers who pay between $100 and $150 for a 30-minute session can swim with, touch and feed the creatures.

The probe, launched by the Treasury Department's Office of Foreign Assets Control, has inserted U.S. agents into a raging animal rights battle involving a colorful cast that includes Robin Leach, host of television's Lifestyles of the Rich and Famous; Che Guevara's 38-year-old daughter, Celia, the chief marine mammal veterinarian at Cuba's National Aquarium; Ric O'Barry, a Miami resident and former Flipper trainer at Miami's Seaquarium who has turned savior; and Gwen McKenna, a mild-sounding Toronto housewife, who with vast archives on dolphin exploitation ranks as one of the world's fiercest dolphin defenders.

While U.S law permits the capture of dolphins, a voluntary moratorium has taken hold in American waters since 1990, chiefly as a result of pressure brought by rights activists. When applications are made for the federal permits required to catch the animals, dolphin defenders rush to create negative publicity.

In the meantime, Cuba's Ministry of Science and Technology and its National Aquarium in Havana, where Guevara's daughter works, have captured a lucrative market for the animals, not only in the Caribbean but also in Europe. The Science Ministry licenses dolphin exports and voluntarily submits data to a U.N. agency responsible for compiling information on world trade in animals.

The official figures reported by Havana show steady dolphin sales -- 82 in the last five years -- making Cuba the world's leading exporter. Worldwide, there are 1,000 dolphins in captivity.

On the international market, dolphins cost between $40,000 and $70,000 for ''green,'' or newly captured, animals.

Animal rights activists say federal investigators have targeted a South African-born physician, Graham Simpson, who has dual U.S. and British citizenship. He and his wife, Pam Pike, also an American, started the Anguilla and Antigua operations, run now by Dolphin Fantaseas Ltd., a company based in Bermuda. Corporate filings on Anguilla suggest that other Americans may have invested to help Simpson in initial stages.

'THEY ARE THE ENEMY'

Robin Leach, who has had a home on Antigua since 1990, is lending his media heft to the activists' cause. From Las Vegas, where he lives part time, the television personality is bald in his description of the Simpsons: "They are the enemy.''

Railing against the couple, Leach says: "It's totally immoral. Dolphins don't perform unless they are starved.''

When Dolphin Fantaseas, originally called Dolphin Lagoon, was preparing to open its first site on Anguilla last spring, local news reports described the arrival from Cuba of six dolphins, packed in ice, on a Russian charter flight. Out of water, dolphins will overheat.

The animals were installed in a large tank on a stunning promontory at Meads Bay on the northwest coast of Anguilla. Looking much like an oversize swimming pool, the tank is a few steps from a comfortable beige-colored bungalow where the Simpsons live along with an elderly black Labrador, a pure white macaw and a large library of books on spirituality.

Offering customers what are called educational swim encounters, Dolphin Fantaseas charges $105 for a half-hour session. Tourists in life vests enter the 17-foot-deep pool to touch and feed the powerful animals, and to listen underwater to their ethereal creaking noises. The feel of a dolphin is akin to stroking a shelled hard-boiled egg.

DOMINICAN BROKER INVOLVED

To obtain the animals, Simpson says, he signed a contract with a broker in the Dominican Republic. He says the broker never told him Cuba was the supplier until just before delivery, adding that even then he gave no thought to possible violations of U.S. law.

''I thought of myself as a British citizen living for the last three years in Anguilla, which has no law against buying from Cuba. It really didn't occur to me this might be a problem.'' Simpson says he has traveled to Cuba on his British passport.

A boyish-looking man of 51 with long, floppy gray hair, Simpson is an imposing figure, six feet three inches tall and more than 200 pounds, looking much like the rugby player he was when growing up in South Africa in the 1960s.

Before coming to Anguilla, he practiced medicine in Reno, Nev., where for years he combined mainstream and alternative therapies to promote a holistic approach to physical and spiritual well-being.

Dolphin Fantaseas' slogan is ''Experience the dream.'' But the Simpsons recount nightmares in dealing with animal rights groups, which they say have hounded them with mass letter-writing campaigns to the governments on Anguilla and Antigua, with threats of a tourism boycott against Anguilla, and with vicious attacks on their personal lives.

Simpson wrote a long, anguished letter to the local press, decrying his critics. Summing up, he said: "The usual activist procedure is to try to scare people . . . by threatening a tourism boycott. I am very upset that the dolphin activists don't focus on the issues, but rather try to personally smear people in the hope of discrediting a fine dolphin swim project.''

ANIMAL RIGHTS ISSUES

McKenna and O'Barry, who is a consultant for the World Society for the Protection of Animals, have led the charge against the Simpsons. They say the issues are the violent capture methods used on highly intelligent, free-ranging creatures that should not be taken from their pods, or families, to live out lives in barren tanks or confined sea enclosures. ''Dolphins have a brain a third larger than ours,'' O'Barry says.

McKenna, who fights on behalf of no other animal, admits that when it comes to dolphins, ''I am ruthless.'' In trying to stop the Simpsons, she appealed for an international tourism boycott of Anguilla, and she raised money to send O'Barry there in December 2000 to speak publicly on the issue.

It backfired. O'Barry was shouted down by islanders enraged that activists might try to damage a main source of their livelihood. O'Barry says he never supports boycotts, and McKenna now regards the effort as a tactical mistake.

At his South Miami home, O'Barry calls Dolphin Fantaseas ''the most dangerous operation I have ever seen around the world.'' He fears that Simpson and his partners eventually intend to sell dolphins, pointing to a recent agreement between Dolphin Fantaseas and the Antigua government of Prime Minister Lester Bird, which gives the company the right to capture 12 dolphins a year.

Indeed, Simpson and his partners have recently created another company, Dolphin Leasing Inc. But Simpson and other company executives reject the notion, saying that no captures have taken place in Antigua so far, and that if they do, the animals would be used only in Dolphin Fantaseas attractions.

In trying to cut down sales, O'Barry says, he went to Cuba in 1997 to seek the aid of Celia Guevara, thinking she could help slow Cuba's capture program.

''Vets have the most influence in the captivity industry, but she didn't show for our meeting,'' O'Barry says. "Here's a woman who has a lot of power. She stands out. That was my hope.''

In meetings with other officials at the National Aquarium, O'Barry says, he failed to persuade the Cubans to end their dolphin exports. His effort at the aquarium was probably futile because commercial sales are handled by another science ministry office.

Last December, after Simpson opened his second site on Antigua, Leach invited O'Barry to the island to speak publicly. But before boarding a flight at Miami International Airport, O'Barry was told he would be arrested and returned to the United States if he tried to enter Antigua. He learned later that the island government considered him a national security threat.

ACTIVISTS CRITICIZED

Simpson, meanwhile, expresses only derision for the activists. It is O'Barry, McKenna, Leach and their followers, he says, who have unrelentingly harassed him and his family, going so far as to meddle in his finances. To cause him embarrassment in the islands, the activists have delved into and publicized a costly bankruptcy proceeding Simpson was forced into over his development of a Reno golf resort.

The activists also bandied gossip about his recent divorce and remarriage to Pike. ''These people have no moral grounds,'' Simpson says.

As for the trade embargo, O'Barry says: ''I don't agree with the law, but we are using it.'' Clarifying, he adds that "the embargo should be lifted for humanitarian reasons. However -- and this is very important -- the part of the embargo that prohibits Americans from purchasing dolphins from Cuba should forever remain.''

In recent weeks, the Treasury Department has issued stiff fines against Americans who have spent money in Cuba after traveling to the island without seeking U.S. permission. Technically, it is not illegal to go to Cuba, but it is illegal to spend money there.

So for Simpson, the continuing attacks from animal rights militants will seem minor travails if U.S. officials find a link between Cuba and the Americans behind Dolphin Fantaseas. ''Do you think I'll be able to go to United States again?'' he asked.

Penalties for violating the embargo range up to $1 million in corporate fines and tens of thousands in individual fines, and, in a criminal case, may bring as much as 10 years in prison.
 
Not all dolphin swim locations are run the same ... I've heard unfavorable things about the ones down in Mexico, but haven't been there to see for myself.

Freeport I can speak to specifically ... we were told that their dolphins are "free" dolphins, they are able to go out into the ocean every night ... if they don't return in the morning, so be it ... but they do return ... they probably know a good deal when they see it (free food & play without captivity).
 
Interesting. I don't think I could help support a business like that. It might be different if these were animals that could no longer survive in the wild, but I guess there is not a large supply of dolphins that fit into that group.
 
Very interesting article.
That is one reason I really liked Stingray City in Grand Cayman. The stingrays come of their own free will and choose to interact with people. Although I might do a captive dolphin swim, I wouldn't be entirely comfortable with it, and it wouldn't bother me not to do one if all captive dolphin programs were banned.
I did the sea lion swim in Cozumel, and while the animals were well cared for, I don't think they're all that keen on the interaction programs. The sea lion that was supposed to be used refused to obey, so they gave up and got another one. At least they didn't force the first one, but I could see that they only do it because of the food bribery.
I have also stopped attending circuses that use animals because I've realized there's no way animals can be happy being stuck in tiny cages for 90 percent of the time.
On the other hand, I was impressed by the Cat Man in Key West because the cats are totally loose, and at the end of the show, they are sitting in open carriers. They don't run away, just lie there and let people pet them. If my own cats are any indication, there's no way they would be trained through force/abuse and still stick around when loose.
I think some animals thrive on doing tricks, while others hate it. My young horse is a real ham, and I have trained him tricks because he has a natural talent. There is no force involved, just rewards for natural behaviors that I have refined. I think he would be totally in his element performing in front of an audience.
Just my two cents.
Barb
Visit the Platinum Castaway Club at: www.castawayclub.com
 

My 10 year old DD had been lobbying heavily to do a dolphin swim on our upcoming Western. But, this past summer she spent 2 weeks at the Dana Point Ocean Institute observing FREE dolphins playing around the research boat during their daily sailings. On her own, she found that the Dolphin Discovery dolphins were indeed in captivity (although apparently well cared for) and figured out how much money the DD people were making off of them. She has now asked us not to book it and has said Stingray City will be enough for her (we'll find something else to do on Cozumel).
 
Thanks so much for posting this Clarabelle Cow. I think it's very important to draw attention to the fact that animals used for entertainment usually suffer for the cause.

I am often saddened by the fact that many individuals feel that animals don't suffer in these kinds of situations, or worse, that people don't really care if they do suffer so long as they are entertained.

Although I don't claim to be an expert on animal behavior, as the companion to five wonderful cats (my children, really! Or, am I their child? :) ) I can assure you that what the "cat man" does in Key West is not natural. Cats don't behave like that. It really frightens me to think of what was done to these animals in order to "train" them to perform. Is that entertainment that you really want to condone? I'm sorry if this grates anyone the wrong way but I am firm in my convictions that animals are not "for our enjoyment." They are living beings, just as we are, and should be treated with respect, conviction, and kindness. Cats are not ment to perform and they shouldn't be expected to.

Sorry folks, just my opinion! And I applaude all of you that have taken a stand against this type of activity!
 
When I did the dolphin encounter in freeport, I didn't think twice about it. That was about 6 or 7 years ago. But after all the boycotting I heard while visiting St. Maarten, I started to think twice. I'm an animal lover, 2 dogs, 2 cats and a horse, (who at 16 is a pretty smarty cookie!!) I started looking at things from the animals perspective and WOW!! Plus after doing the Harbor Branch tour in Vero 2 last week, and watching the dolphins just swimming around in the river, I realized unless hurt, these animals really belong out in the wild.
 
My opinion is in my signature. No flames please, but I am very passionate about the banning of animals for entertainment.

JMO and we're all entitled to them. I will say no more on the subject.
 
Well, we all know Alice Walker is a genius in her own right! ::yes::
 
Thank you for posting the article. I have been going back and forth on doing the dolphin swim in Anguilla.

My question is...how is this different than Sea World? Why don't we hear about these protests going on in Florida and San Diego. Discovery Cove charges outrageous fees to do their swim with the dolphin program. All of the dolphins, whales, stingray, etc. are captive at Sea World, but yet millions of people visit those parks every year (myself included.)

:confused:
 
Originally posted by NYDisneyMom
Thank you for posting the article. I have been going back and forth on doing the dolphin swim in Anguilla.

My question is...how is this different than Sea World? Why don't we hear about these protests going on in Florida and San Diego. Discovery Cove charges outrageous fees to do their swim with the dolphin program. All of the dolphins, whales, stingray, etc. are captive at Sea World, but yet millions of people visit those parks every year (myself included.)

:confused:

Good point
 
I am more than likely way off base with this, but aren't alot of the animals at Sea World (like here at Boston's Aquarium) animals that were rescued from one issue or another?

This made me think of Keiko, the star of Free Willy, who they then freed, and he didnt' do well, and just died recently. So sad. :(

My kids are anxiously awaiting the age that they are old enough to swim with the dolphins at Disney - I guess I never put much thought into this sort of thing. :(
 
And how different is it from the dolphins in The Living Seas in Epcot? I know those dolphins are well tended, but they are still living in capitvity.

I've done the Dolphins in Depth program at Epcot twice. Shortly after the second time, one of the dolphins died, which makes me sad. They were approximately 20 years old, I believe. They've brought a new one in.

But on a different note, and just to tell you a dolphin experience that is remarkable -- my daughter and I did the program (she's a CM). Two months later I was down for another visit and we went to the Living Seas to see if we could see "our dolphin."

We were in one of the second-story viewing windows when "our dolphin" came by -- he was distinguishable by a black smudge on his melon (top of head).

He zipped by us, stopped, and came back and hung in the window, staring at us. I swear he recognized us! We talked to him for a while and patted the window. He eventually got bored with us and left.

The second time I did the program I talked to one of the handlers about this and she said it was possible he had recognized us from a few months before. Thought that was way cool.
 
I have done "a little" research into this because I have wanted to swim with dolphins and Killer whales since I was young enough to remember. I did do a dolphin swim when they offered the DIP "Dolphin Interaction Program" at Sea World before Discovery Cove was open. I have also done the swim at Discovery Cove and Trainer for a Day at Sea World. I know that most of the the dolphin programs out of the United States don't have the stringent laws and rules that places like SW and DC do to protect these beautiful intelligent creatures. I believe at DC, each dolphin can only "work" and that's what their doing, four hours a day. I know they seem happy and playful doing these things and maybe some of them are (I know I certainly like to think so) but they have been trained with food rewards to cooperate. I know at Sea World, if the animals don't want to cooperate, they don't force them and let them swim off. And yes, a lot of animals at Sea World were rescued or wouldn't survive in their natural habitat. They also have a rehabilitate and release program. I am not plugging for Sea World, I am just giving my opinion on the subject as I now feel torn between bringing them harm by keeping the money rolling in to these programs and being able to play and touch my favorite animals in the whole world. A lot of places in different countires keep their dolphins in cramped, dirty and unhealthy environments that are dangerous to them as well as the well meaning swimmers (myself included) who pay for the joy to touch them. They are also fed rotten food and a lot of them have diseases and are dying. It makes me cry when I think too hard about it and I know I am a hypocrit because I will cherish the moments I've had with them for the rest of my life. I guess my feeling on it is if you must do this, please participate in a protective, and healthy facility.
 
I do agree that badly run Swim With Dolphin (SWD) should be shut down as they are detrimental to a dolphin's health.

On the other side of the argument, as a first year university student, I did a project regarding this exact topic. Many scientific studies have been conducted on SWD programs, and they found that if run properly, there are no adverse effects on dolphins.

If anyone is interested in some of the research journals, I can send you a link.

So not all SWD programs are bad, just keep that in mind before cancelling!

Katdb
 
in Freeport a few years ago under much protesting from me. I relented because my inlaws and my kids really wanted to do it. It was really interesting to see them up close and they seemed very well taken care of..no broken fins or anything but it just didnt feel "right" being there. Of course I hate going to the zoo, the circus or anywhere animals are held against their will. We were in Las Vegas 3 weeks ago and the amount of animals they have there is amazing. The lion exhibit in MGM Grand, the shark reef exhibit in Mandalay Bay, the Tigers in Mandalay bay...it goes on and on and on. While these animals are amazing to look at I think they belong where they belong and it isnt behind glass for us to gawk at them.

JMO
Heidi
 
Kat, I would love to see the scientific article links.

Carla
 
I hope this works. My other article isn't accessible over the net anymore, but this one still seems to be. THe only thing I'm not sure of is if you will need an access code to get into it (I'm a university student and we have access to these journals).

Here it goes!
http://scholarsportal.info/cgi-bin/...81i0002&article=163_broccdddtap&form=fulltext


Katdb
P.S. I'm studying Marine Biology in hope to get into vet school for either small animal or marine mammals, so this subject was very interesting for me. There is lots of info on the net if you hunt around!
 
I think that this subject comes up a lot more often now because people are becoming more educated. I used to go to zoos and circuses without ever thinking about the treatment of the animals. Then I started reading about protests and studying up on the topic, and what I learned made me switch to non-animal forms of entertainment. I do love the Animal Kingdom (I don't like captivity, but if it's done, that's the way to do it). But now I can't stand to go to Brookfield Zoo here in Chicago because it is a disgusting pit in comparison, and most of the animals exhibit neurotic behaviors. I've been to Discovery Cove and enjoyed it, but I wouldn't miss it if it closed tomorrow because animal captivity had been outlawed.
Three Circles, I understand your point, but I wish you could have met my cat Vinnie (he's been dead for several years but I still miss him so much). As a former alley cat, he was a total mooch and beggar, and I taught him a variety of tricks just for the fun of it. He loved it as long as lots of treats were involved (hmmm, maybe my horse is Vinnie reincarnated). I've always thought Cat Man's cats might have that type of personality. The only thing I would worry about is if he starves them before a show.
Barb
Visit the Platinum Castaway Club at: www.castawayclub.com
 

GET UP TO A $1000 SHIPBOARD CREDIT AND AN EXCLUSIVE GIFT!

If you make your Disney Cruise Line reservation with Dreams Unlimited Travel you’ll receive these incredible shipboard credits to spend on your cruise!

























DIS Facebook DIS youtube DIS Instagram DIS Pinterest

Back
Top