- Joined
- May 4, 2006
- Messages
- 26,295
You may be right. I use Chrome on my laptop and Safari on my iPad - adbock plus works great on both of them.I have yet to find an adblocker that works on my mobile version of Chrome (Android or iOS).
You may be right. I use Chrome on my laptop and Safari on my iPad - adbock plus works great on both of them.I have yet to find an adblocker that works on my mobile version of Chrome (Android or iOS).
Actually, the lighter and matches not being allowed is no longer a “thing”. You can board an aircraft with all of the above. The TSA keeps everyone on their toes! Lol. I fly almost weekly and things change frequently but the lighters and matches have stayed on the OK list for at least the past 5 years.
Yeah. Do you really think drug addicts don’t have jobs? They may not be bus drivers but I know attorneys cpas admins etc who have or had a drug problem and still worked. And when it’s treated as a medical condition and not a crime are treated differently
Calm down - all you need to do is install an adblocker. You can download one for free - just google it. And FWIW, you would not be seeing tooth ads (or toenail fungus ads
@TipsyTraveler ) if you hadn't searched for similar things on your own computer at some point.
I work at the HQ of a very popular nationwide retailer and its the same policy at our stores (which your aunt may work at..probably not, we dont sell TVs), but they can follow them around the store and sound the door alarm at the entrance to check a receipt.Additionally, my Aunt is a manager of a very popular nationwide retailer. Their employment policy strictly states that no store employee should ever try to stop or engage with anyone shoplifting, even if they are blatantly walking out with a TV. They are to call police and never engage for the above reason. Termination is immediate for anyone who tries to engage a shoplifter because it puts the whole store, all employees and customers at risk of unknown dangers.
I agree. I always try to put myself in everyones shoes. While I think the ban is fine, I know I can only say that because I dont smoke. Instead of everyone saying "Great...you should quit anyway etc.." Try "Im sorry about the new ban, I know it will be difficult for you". Simple. But people will always be people.Your approach is fabulous. I think it’s shameful for all of that hate put on “smokers” in this thread. It hurts my heart that people just because they don’t like it or don’t agree can belittle and throw out their thoughts, opinions, solutions so rudely. (There have been some that had lovely and compassionate replies so credit given where credit due <3).
Yeah, my DF/USMC and a smoker ( later quit cold turkey), would bring home "c" rations and they had a pack of 4 cigarettes in them. He passed away at the age 0f 86 5 years ago. His Dad and Brother both died of lung cancer.
What a horrible classification!!! So presumptive! I know far more white collar professionals that smoke than blue collar. Probably because smoking is an expensive habit!
My father smokes and you can’t get anymore white collar than he. When I was younger I would “bum” a smoke once in awhile when out with friends and even at that “younger” stage (mid 20’s) I had a graduate degree and was already making deep into 6 figures with zero debt.
Horrible, horrible, horrible!
I'm with you. Not happy about this. The only saving grace is next time we go, my youngest will over 7. I can't even imagine trying to handle 3 kids under 7 while my husband has to go out the gates to smoke, then wait for him to come back. I hope they have a special entrance so the smokers can get back inside quickly to their families.
It is a generalization based on data, not a personal judgment or condemnation. The smoking rate for Americans with a GED is NINE TIMES the rate for Americans with a graduate degree. Income-wise, the rate for people earning less than $35K/year is twice what it is for people making $70K or more. There are, of course, exceptions - someone makes up that single-digit percentage of educated, higher-earning Americans who smoke - but smokers as a whole are a lower-income, less educated group than the population as a whole.
It DEFINTELY sounds like a PIA, and with small kids I would also not want to deal with it (but I am not a smoker). I do think it is a matter of getting used to the rule. Also, there are plenty of families that handle parks like the San Diego Zoo, which is smoke free. I read that you cannot even smoke in the parking lot. Over 4 million visited the zoo in 2018 (and 1.5 million visited the Safari, also smoke free). While this is only a small fraction of visitors who visit the Disney parks, it can be managed.Doubtful. I think the point is to highly discourage smoking & make it as big a PIA as they can. There are some who are so addicted that they’ll go through whatever hoops necessary to smoke but a lot won’t. I think it’ll cut down on the overall amount of smokers in the DSAs.
I forgot to mention, if any smoker, wagon user or ice bringer has a Cali Grill brunch ADR for 3 on 08/11 or 08/18, I highly suggest you cancel your trip and boycott Disney (just let me know when you do)![]()
While not in the same fashion of going to theme parks it's honestly interesting to me when my family and friends talk about the days of smoking in restaurants. It's been a while but not ridiculously long ago that you were asked "smoking or non".It DEFINTELY sounds like a PIA, and with small kids I would also not want to deal with it (but I am not a smoker). I do think it is a matter of getting used to the rule. Also, there are plenty of families that handle parks like the San Diego Zoo, which is smoke free. I read that you cannot even smoke in the parking lot. Over 4 million visited the zoo in 2018 (and 1.5 million visited the Safari, also smoke free). While this is only a small fraction of visitors who visit the Disney parks, it can be managed.
I think what Colleen is pointing out is that a good percentage of smokers in the United States are low income earners. That’s a fact. Low income earners typically aren’t taking vacations to the Disney parks. Nothing she said did I take as condemning any one. She stated that her own husband smokes.Why all this talk about the economic classification and generalizations about people who smoke?
It's almost as if people are responding with these economic "facts" as a reason why there won't be any impact on Disney's bottom line.
Perhaps it somehow justifies the condemnation of smokers. It's as if it is being suggested that lower socio-economic groups need to be "guided" in their personal substance choices.
Disney treated these people with no regard. Giving 30 days notice is a joke.
I don't think so. People will just have less family time because they are out smoking, or more will just light up wherever.Doubtful. I think the point is to highly discourage smoking & make it as big a PIA as they can. There are some who are so addicted that they’ll go through whatever hoops necessary to smoke but a lot won’t. I think it’ll cut down on the overall amount of smokers in the DSAs.
I wonder if DCL will ban it altogether at some point as well. That would be great!
I don't understand the concern that foreign visitors will now abandon the parks because other parts of the world are more used to being able to still smoke around the general population. If those foreign visitors are at DW, doesn't that mean they had to tolerate a many-hour plane flight without their "fix" ? Therefore, they shouldn't have an issue. Further, if US park visitors are so upset that now they will just go to Disney Paris, since smoking is more okay there for now, don't they also need a 7-8 hour plane flight (where they will not be able to get their fix)? How will they manage that if they can't manage a few hours in the Orlando parks?
I dunno, I’m getting tooth implant ads too and I’m positive I haven’t ever searched for that. I do think ads can be targeted towards key words in thread discussions. I’ve noticed before that I’ll start getting ads for luggage on travel-related threads, etc. One time someone was complaining about ads of the “adult variety” and of course everyone ridiculed the OP for bringing it upon himself but, sure enough, soon those types of ads were popping up for me on that thread.
30 years ago when I started, the idea of smoking as a health-hazard was just starting to emerge (think about your Surgeon General's report in the late '80s). Although it wasn't encouraged, smoking was totally not presented as the huge, stupid risk we now know it to be. Certainly many people opposed it but mostly on moral or visceral grounds.
And then go to your job?![]()
I also thought about the demographics of smokers & when I first heard thought maybe it was an attempt by wdw to control who is in the parks. If it’s not a direct attempt to do that, I don’t think they are concerned at all about whether this demographic is upset about the change.I think what Colleen is pointing out is that a good percentage of smokers in the United States are low income earners. That’s a fact. Low income earners typically aren’t taking vacations to the Disney parks. Nothing she said did I take as condemning any one. She stated that her own husband smokes.