A local teenager was not allowed to attend his prom because he was wearing a kilt. He was wearing it with appropriate (for a semi-formal affair; he did NOT wear a weskit, etc that would have made it formal) accessories; a jacket, white shirt, knee socks and appropriate shoes...no sporran or dagger, that I could see. We live in an area that still has Kirkin of tartans in local churches, annual Highland games, etc so many people do wear their kilts on special occasions.
Should they have denied a girl wearing a sari or someone in any other semi-formal, but not US formal, dress?
The article doesn't say if any male students who were not wearing a suit and tie were denied entrance.
This reminds me of the time I met DH on shore leave in the Bahamas; he had on his dress whites and he was questioned at a restaurant because he wasn't wearing a tie. The owner had to set the maitre'd straight; what he was wearing is equivilant to a dark suit and tie in civilian attire.
Should they have denied a girl wearing a sari or someone in any other semi-formal, but not US formal, dress?

This reminds me of the time I met DH on shore leave in the Bahamas; he had on his dress whites and he was questioned at a restaurant because he wasn't wearing a tie. The owner had to set the maitre'd straight; what he was wearing is equivilant to a dark suit and tie in civilian attire.
