Newspaper says Disney Princesses are not good role models!

Princess_Belle

DIS Veteran
Joined
Feb 5, 2007
Messages
599
This was on the front page of our life section of the Sunday newspaper! I was pretty ticked about the whole thing! It made me want to call the newspaper and yell for printing such a stupid story! Read for yourself.

Princess Fiona is no Cinderella. Her ball gown, likely sized in the double digits, hugs a full-figured, green ogre body. Fiona outbelches the guys and plays no victim to villains but battles them "Matrix"-style herself. The atypical heroine from the "Shrek" movie series is in a town far, far away from beloved fairy tale princesses of the past.​

Anna E. Lott, who teaches women's studies courses at the University of North Alabama, applauds the "Shrek" trilogy for showing a different side to the princess persona.​

"I think I like the 'Shrek' movies because they play with expectations created by earlier films where women are helpless and need to be rescued," she said.​

Pop culture interest in the fairer royalty spans Disney classics, front-page coverage about ex-almost princess Kate Middleton's split from Prince William and girls' fashion.​

At her children's clothing store, Dena Diane, located at 2568 Mall St. in Florence, owner Anita Moore sells princess-themed clothing and accessories and hosts princess parties for her young clients.​

"They love it," she said. "Being a princess has always been part of a girl's childhood."​

Moore attributes the fashion craze of all things princess to movies, which influence trends in children's retail clothing, which in turn impact smaller boutiques.​

Girls age 3 to 8 clamor the most for princess fashions at her store Moore said, but older girls also indulge in royal treatment.-"We even have princess-themed accessories for preteens," Moore said.​

Amy Young, of Florence, mother of two daughters, a 9-year-old and 11-year-old, who attend princess parties, says the parties promote uniqueness.​

"It gives them a chance to feel special," she said. "At these parties, it's not just the birthday girl who's being celebrated. All of the little girls are celebrated."​

Lott thinks girls' interest in such play is negative to their self-concepts.​

"The idea that girls want to be princesses is not a positive thing for girls," she said. "The implication for a girl to be a princess is that she has to be weak."​

Moore sees girls' interest in princesses as a better alternative to bypassing the phase and going from playing with dolls straight into adolescence.​

"It's so much better than girls trying to look like teenagers," she said. "I think dressing up like princesses is more suited to parents and girls. A lot of girls were missing out on a part of their childhood."​

Lott sees possible misconceptions in the princess play fantasy.​

"There's probably a danger in approaching adulthood thinking you are going to be a princess," she said.​

It is Disney that Lott thinks promotes the damsel in distress image girls are exposed to.​

"That's something Disney has played a big part in propagating," she said.​

Disney has a Web site dedicated to princesses of yore such as Belle and Jasmine at http://disney.go.com/-princess/html/main_iframe.html.​

In later years, Disney has featured less-conventional heroines who don't always win a prince in movies such as "Mulan" and "Pocahontas."​

Lott notes that such princess characters are anomalies.​

She notes that beauty, traditionally the often-conventional good looks of fairy tale princesses, is a common determining factor in starting romantic relationships and hiring for jobs.​

She said "Shrek" teaches girls that certain values such as love transcend beauty.​

"What I like about 'Shrek' is that in the end, without restoring physical beauty, two ogres love each other for what they are."​

She cites situations from the first "Shrek" film where Princess Fiona outwitted and physically overtook her male rescuers.​

Lott said recent evolutions of the princess from untouchable pristine beauty to a more independent woman mirrors society's views of women.​

Young believes a princess can have her pink cake and be independent as well.​

"I think a young girl can and should be taught that being feminine does not necessarily mean that they are-dependent on a male or dominant-figure."​

What do you think!? I'm getting mad reading it again. I guess these people would think the BBB is a place to make little girls feel bad about themselves!

Oh and get this underneath this story way a story titled "Ways to Save Money in Disney World". First lets bash them, then lets tell why you need to go?:confused3 Our Newspaper is ridiculous!
 
That article sounds rather mean-spirited.

The Disney Princesses are not bad role models. I personally see them as good role models. For one thing, they remind us to never give up on our dreams, no matter what and that wishes will always come true.
 
I second what DisneyPhilip said.
Personally, I see the Disney Princesses as being extremely strong women, like Cinderella being inwardly beautiful (along with outwardly) while being treated like dirt by her step family, and achieving her dreams in the end... and how can you tell me that in Beauty and the Beast, Belle fell for Beast because of his good looks?
None of them are damsels in distress (aside from maybe Snow White, but you know... she was still kind and strong-hearted despite having someone out to kill her all the time) and actually, many of the stories date back to times WAY before Disney ever adopted and adapted them.

That article is bogus in my opinion.. why would a newspaper print something like that? Lack of news? :rotfl2:
 
:eek: Yes lack of news is exactly right, both of those look like AP stories so don’t blame your local newspaper for filling space. I have heard this argument before hmmm, was it Barbie dolls, the princesses are products of their times you have to think of when they came out. Now at Disney all little girls, and some big girls and I suppose some little boys can be princesses. Good job professor going after an easy target that won’t fight back. JMHO
 

I wouldn't be upset about it. It's not worth the energy. I just take these things with a grain of salt. This is not a new story. This has been an argument out there for a long time about the whole concept of princesses, Barbie dolls, etc.
 
I dislike any article that seems to think one genre is so influential. I wore a witch costume on Halloween and GUESS WHAT ... I did not become a demon worshiper! I also LOVED LOVED LOVED princess stuff and yet I am a productive member of society ... make a living ... have a home ...

Parents hold the key in making sure that whatever a child emulates is healthy. It's the balence of it all that makes the difference (and my hat's off to parents!).

But it was an interesting article ... I had not seen that one!
 
I don't see what the big deal is. One person interviewed in the article is anti Disney ... so what. I don't really think that many parents are teaching, telling, instructing their children that they should grow up to be like Cinderalla, Sleeping Beauty or any other princess in a Disney movie, or otherwise ... Shrek included (who wants their DD to marry an ogre anyway).

These are fictionaly characters that while at some point in a fairy tale do something that sets a good example for a child they don't do much else. If your teenage daughter still regularily dresses as a princess and is waiting for her prince to arrive you've got big problems.

Take it for what it is worth, a space filler, interest story for a Sunday newspaper.
 
I guess the people quoted in the article didnt get their dream day to dress as a princess their wedding day. Most girls dream about that day where we get to dress in our beautiful gown as well as marry our true love the man of our dreams!

I mean please this article is silly. Most of us girls played dress up, watched Disney movies, or read the stories and turned out fine. Oh yeah we played with Barbies too.
 
I'd rather have my daughter use the Princesses as role models as opposed to Brittney Spears or Lindsay Lohan, but maybe that's just me...
 
Am I the only one that pictures Anne E. Lott as having John Lennon glasses, dirty hair, hairy armpits and smelling of patchouli?

I hate these so-called "gender-studies" experts. These self-appointed PC police are going out of their way to ruin everything that is good about life just because they weren't hugged enough as a child (or more likely because they were given everything they wanted as children, so now they feel they must rebel against their trust-funds).

I could really get into a rant here, so I'll just stop now before I get myself in trouble.
 
I'd rather have my daughter use the Princesses as role models as opposed to Brittney Spears or Lindsay Lohan, but maybe that's just me...




:cheer2:

Nope, it's not just you! The wonderful thing about these Princess Characters is they're a constant, from the 1st time Snow White appeared, now to Fiona, they've never disappeared for over 4-5 generations.



Just 1 person's opinion.....
 
Disney Princesses might reply:

Newspapers are a dying medium with much less influence than in years gone by.

They must rely more heavily on shock value and outlandish statements to gain attention.

(Say, newpapers are alot like Britney!)
 
I hate to admit it, but I think the moronic Lott may have the beginnings of a point.

I certainly don't think that the Disney princesses are all bad role models, but some of them do lack some of the more modern positive aspects. And even Fiona has a somewhat skewed vision of life at first - she sits helpless in her tower, waiting for some handsome knight to come and rescue her and live happily ever after, when it's obvious (later in the movie) that she is capable of recuing herself. And when she transforms permanently into an ogress, she stutters, "But, I'm supposed to be beautiful!" Shrek's response: "You ARE beautiful!"

I'm not saying thst the princess characters are bad role models; certainly, they all stand for the side of good and happiness. But most of them are the "wait for a man to come and take care of me" types, rather than the "I can take care of myself" types. I just think that aspect of the princess persona needs to be de-emphasized these days, because too much of that attitude, from parents, peers, and even entertainment, produces monsterous girls like those in the TV show My Super Sweet 16.
 
I like the princesses much more as an adult, than I did as a kid. As a little girl, I didn't think they were much fun, and I guess reading that article makes me realize that I am in the 0.01% who didn't want to play princess as a little girl and didn't want the big wedding ballgown when she got married. As much as I enjoy them today, I'm not sure if "role model" would be the strongest association I would make with "Disney Princess".
 
"There's probably a danger in approaching adulthood thinking you are going to be a princess," she said.



I was devastated when I figured out at age 17 that I was NOT going to be a princess!!!
OH BROTHER. :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:
How do people come up with this drivel?
 
I'm calm now. . .

Several years ago, USA Today actually rated the Princesses on which ones actually were good role models.

Cinderella and Belle got A's for being strong, level headed, independent women.

Snow White got a B, while being a strong woman, the whole falling for the poisen apple hurt her.

Aurora got a C. Not a whole lot to go on.

Ariel got an F. She was a ditz. Let's face it, in today's world, Ariel is Paris Hilton.

The Princes usually got the opposite grade than their corresponding Prince, with Eric and Phillip getting the highest marks.
 
I'd rather have my daughter use the Princesses as role models as opposed to Brittney Spears or Lindsay Lohan, but maybe that's just me...

Amen!!!!! And I don't even have daughters!!!!
 
Am I the only one that pictures Anne E. Lott as having John Lennon glasses, dirty hair, hairy armpits and smelling of patchouli?

Here's your wish come true ... a photo of Anna E. Lott below, courtesy of the North Alabama University website!!!!!
untitled-3.jpg
 
Interestingly, Ariel's counterpart in the real story would get high marks. When faced with the option to KILL the prince to earn back her fins, she chooses to die herself. A truly selfless act. (of course the prince isn't marrying Ursula in the original story - just another girl who he loves). The moral of the original story is that Love is stronger than Death.
 
I'm still thinking here.....

None of the Disney princesses really sit around waiting for a man to "rescue" them do they? Maybe Aurora is LEFT in that situation but it isn't really her choice. Snow White would have happily spent the rest of her lift taking care of the dwarves, Belle is looking for MORE but not necessarily a rescue, Cinderella as well.

DD loves Mulan the best - and I think that she is a GREAT role model!
 












Receive up to $1,000 in Onboard Credit and a Gift Basket!
That’s right — when you book your Disney Cruise with Dreams Unlimited Travel, you’ll receive incredible shipboard credits to spend during your vacation!
CLICK HERE






DIS Facebook DIS youtube DIS Instagram DIS Pinterest DIS Tiktok DIS Twitter DIS Bluesky

Back
Top Bottom