afan
Honorary Bus Driver
- Joined
- Dec 30, 2014
- Messages
- 9,358
How are you so sure about this? I'm genuinely curious. Unless you have inside info?
Sure of what? That she's done good things at DLP? Because I follow a couple of DLP bloggers that I trust and read about what's she's said when she was at the park after Disney took full control.
That I called her a scapegoat? No inside info but if it was so bad at DLR and WDW why was she let go instead of the president's of each of those parks. Why wasn't Chapek let go if he's got so much involvement in the parks and what's been decided? Because when it comes to WDW and DLR I never hear about her, which leads me to believe that while she was the one those president's reported to, she was more focused on DLP. Or wasn't "allowed"/"able" to make decisions because Chapek and/or Iger were more involved in the bigger and smaller stuff. Chapek gets blamed for most everything in the US parks, not Catherine, and he's the one that speaks out about stuff, so why wouldn't she be a scapegoat?
Unless someone knows more about what she's done outside of DLP. It could also just be that they found the position redundant and it does seem a bit silly to have it, but then why not get rid of it long ago.