writerguyfl
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Jul 5, 2015
- Messages
- 2,129
Thanks for sharing that last point - I haven’t seen it without the actors but my feels are that it would be similar to you describe
This one just seems odd to me as how much is that really going to save? And this was to be a big part of the enabling AK to be an evening park as well.
Like I get closing down Rafiki’s planet watch - lot of area to maintain, the train to maintain, quite a few CMs, and, to be honest, while I know some people that really liked it, it wasn’t a draw to the park. So while I might not like that it is closing, I get it.
This one is more puzzling as the scale of cost savings vs impact of making a signature component a lesser experience doesn’t seem to be there to me
RE: The bolded question.
I think the answer depends upon the classification of those Cast Members. If the roles are Actor's Equity ones, they are going to be paid much higher than "normal" Entertainment Cast Members (like parade performers). Unfortunately, "how much more?" is not a question I can answer.
I'm a part-time actor based in Florida. I get notices for Equity roles at Disney World. I don't save any of those emails, so I can't say whether the initial Rivers of Light roles were Equity ones.