agree this period of building should of started in 2013 at the earliest
So 2 years earlier? They were, and have been, in the middle of Pandora and Disney Springs. DS may not be the big new e-ticket attraction everyone wanted, but it is still a major improvement.
There is this popular notion that things have been stagnant, when in reality, it's just been work on stuff that isn't super popular with the die-hard visitors.
Before DS & Pandora there was New Fantasyland, and while I have said in the past it was silly how long it took them to build a mine cart coaster, it doesn't change the fact that the ride has been absurdly popular. Or that Be Our Guest is one of the most popular restaurants in the park now, even with a $20 cronut (or whatever insane price it was hiked too).
I agree the parks could have done more on the attraction side over the past decade, but I try not to let that color my impressions of the resort as a whole. To say they have been stagnant (not you in particular twebber55, but just from other comments in the thread) is to ignore a lot of building. It ignores the intense popularity of the things that are new. It ignores the hand over fist increase in attendance, despite price increases. It ignores all the plans currently in place. But most of all, it shows a distinct naivety in how to run a business.
In 2006 Disney's stock price was hovering at $30
In 2009 it dipped as low as $19 (driven by a 97% reduction in movie revenue... a really bad 18 months for their movie division)
In 2011 the stock price at Disney was $41.
As of today, in 2016, it is right at $100
That's stagnation? That's the "worst group of managers ever"? The company is worth 2.5x what it was worth only 5 years ago and 5x what it was worth 10 years ago. There have been massive acquisitions and massive investments in the parks laid out.
The parks and company as a whole are not above reproach. They don't have a perfect track record. But when the criticisms aren't even grounded in reality, then what's the point?