I think that is is very likely. They are also running low on prime locations. I would not be surprised if you see a DVC 2.0 - being moderates - after Reflections., but who knowsI wonder when DVC will reach the point of being "overbuilt."
How many people can really afford these prices? It's not only the upfront and ongoing costs, but everything else required to visit WDW - airfare, park tickets, meals, incidentals. I think most of us know that so many people buy DVC as an impulse without considering the long term budget implications. I wonder what percentage of newer buyers feel like they have been sold snake oil, especially given reports of guides increasingly using dishonest tactics to close direct sales.
DVC has proven to be very popular (which is why it has expanded to the point it has thus far) -- but if Riviera and Reflections don't sell well, will that finally signal a halt to building more DVC hotels?
Interesting, I bid $135 on a Poly contract with them a couple of weeks ago and they essentially laughed at me and said no way the Seller would accept that offer. That contract is still out there. If I don't pass ROFR on the contract I am currently working on, I may make another stab at it.
It's not so much an English lesson as understanding what the words mean to a room assignor.Thanks for the answer and the English lesson![]()
Or how about it signal a halt to bad resale-restriction policies designed to benefit no one but Disney?DVC has proven to be very popular (which is why it has expanded to the point it has thus far) -- but if Riviera and Reflections don't sell well, will that finally signal a halt to building more DVC hotels?
I feel like we're running into the first big phase of "people who didn't know what they were buying."
Interesting, I bid $135 on a Poly contract with them a couple of weeks ago and they essentially laughed at me and said no way the Seller would accept that offer. That contract is still out there. If I don't pass ROFR on the contract I am currently working on, I may make another stab at it.
I think you are right about this --We bought a poly resale contract -put in the offer in April -- The sellers had just bought in June of 2017, it was listed for $165 pp in September of 2018. They only owned a little over a year and probably only took one trip if that (even had points in holding that had already expired). I low balled at $140pp and was countered at $150. We settled on $145 pp which i didn't think was too bad as it had a good amount of current points.I feel like we're running into the first big phase of "people who didn't know what they were buying."
I feel like DVC Resale Market does that pretty frequently to offers. I've had a few definitely *normal*, mainstream, not lowball offers, be refused to be passed on to the seller by the agent, and it felt like the agent was just fishing to get me to offer more. It's one thing for the agent to say "I don't think the seller's inclined to accept" but it's another to just sit on the offer and never pass it through. One thing I'm growing to increasingly dislike about shopping the resale market is that because the broker's working both sides of the transaction, they sometimes seem to exhibit conflict of interest-type behavior in some circumstances.
Back when I first bought VGF there was a crazy huge VGF contract for sale - it was over 1000 points and I think it was a guaranteed week in a GV? It was asking around $120pp around then, and sat for a long time, and eventually sold. I don't know what or how it happened, but I think the total asking price was around $112,000.
I feel like DVC Resale Market does that pretty frequently to offers. I've had a few definitely *normal*, mainstream, not lowball offers, be refused to be passed on to the seller by the agent, and it felt like the agent was just fishing to get me to offer more. It's one thing for the agent to say "I don't think the seller's inclined to accept" but it's another to just sit on the offer and never pass it through. One thing I'm growing to increasingly dislike about shopping the resale market is that because the broker's working both sides of the transaction, they sometimes seem to exhibit conflict of interest-type behavior in some circumstances.