I'm glad it's someone I don't know too much about as it makes his Dr more real. As a child I first saw Patrick Troughton, John Pertwee ans Tom Baker as the Doctor so I totally believed in them - when Peter Davison took over I could only think of him as a vet.
IMHO think they have picked a no-name to front Doctor who,as they have a new man in charge who is a true fan and he can mold this doctor better than an established actor
Plus this new guy more likey to be signed up for a longer time than an established name.
To me as long as the storylines are good dosnet mater who plays the WHO
Paulh
I fully agree with these, Tom Baker often called the best Doctor ( before David T ) was a total unknown actor before he became the Doctor and everyone said he doesnt look the part, he is all teeth and curls, he was the longest serving Doctor, Peter as an established actor, was a good Doctor, but with 'All creatures great and small' on at the same time it was confusing.
Yes DT has had other parts but he can play them different in a believable way, Peter Davison is always Peter Davidson what ever he is in.
The BBC had two options, you must remember they are cutting budgets on every show including Doctor Who, so there options were to pay mega money to an established actor, and then cut back on guest stars and CGI and sets, or go for a newer actor, less pay, (In line with the BBC DG's policy) and spend the money saved on better sets and CGI.
The show is stronger than the star, a bad actor can reduce ratings, but I think he will be as good as DT, presume they have him signed up for at least 2 to 3 seasons.