n period should be much shorter, again, no. Why should it be three hours instead of 24? You don't expect them to do that for a resort reservation, do you? How about an airline reservation? Or should any new rule, law and policy just be whatever you want, whenever you want it, however it pleases you? I would never expect a government to allow that, let alone a company just trying to keep all of its facilities open rather than making them seasonal or reducing basic services.
.....
Once again, if you don't think you can make it on-time or at all to an ADR, don't make the ADR. It is not mandatory, it is simply suggested. But to go through life expecting the worst to happen, or to demand an unyielding amount of leeway without consequences... Maybe Walt Disney World isn't the place for you?
This is an internet discussion board. Some people have a different opinion then you have. Posters are entitled to discuss their opinion of Disney's new policy. Some posters think a 3 hour window gives Disney enough notice to either accept a last minute ADR or to know how many additional walkups can be accommodated. Disney strongly suggests
DDP guests make ADRs. AFAIK Disney doesn't hold back tables for walkups.
I think it's kind of a reach to compare Disney's policies with "laws". Even then people have discussions regarding laws.
JMO but it's only a matter of time before other Disney restaurants do the same thing.
Again industry standard isn't to impose "no show" penalties for casual restaurants. Southwest offers a full credit for no shows. Many hotels let you cancel up until 5p on your check in date. Penalties for restaurant "no shows" are certainly not industry standard.
Thirty or thirty-two out of 365 nights, I think?
The poster did say this time of year. The 30 or 32 nights aren't 't spread out over the year. Almost all those nights are either for the Halloween party or the Christmas party.
Oh, really? So you know for a fact that if someone no-shows or cancels their ADR that the Disney restaurant in question will absolutely and unequivocally be able to fill that very table with the exact number of guests it seats? So then what you're saying is: "I guarantee it." Fantastic! Then you wholeheartedly agree with Disney's new policy, which holds you accountable and responsible for that GUARANTEE. So then if they can't fill up the table, you've given Disney permission to charge you $10 per missing person. Thank you. I knew you'd finally come around and appreciate the new policy.
The new policy imposes the charge even if Disney is able to fill the table with a walkup or last minute ADR. Glad to see you've come around and realize how unfair the new policy is.
I don't care if Disney is able to fill the table. Rain results in a lot of no-shows and a shortage of walk ups. I think that's the cost of doing business.
Many doctors do charge for no-shows.

I don't understand your point. You don't really think there is large pool of people waiting at the dentists office hoping for a "no show"? Dentists, who want to keep their patients, don't charge the fee if the patient calls up says something like I'm sick and I don't want to infect your staff.
I'm relatively certain when I've stated an opinion why WDW might be doing this, it's been to provide restaurant seating to (generally) guests who can't or don't know they need to make ADRs; (specifically) locals and first-time visitors/DDP users - but if I've stated otherwise, I'm sure somebody will call me on it.
Respectfully, while you say that, I think few if any posters who disagree with the change are going to be open-minded about it. I think the day-before cancellation works - or will - because I think I'm right about the market Disney is trying to accommodate

. But while I can understand why the people who are unhappy are against the change, I don't understand why they're not willing to give it a chance, or to be flexible - maybe don't make reservations at the affected restaurants, or at least not consecutive ADRs?
You have it reversed. Most of the posters who like the new policy are the posters who aren't being open minded. Not putting you in that category but most others.
Give it a chance. Disney thinks it works and they'll include more restaurants. Doesn't matter if I'm affected by it. The fact that Disney wants me to pay if something comes up at the last minute is the issue. Not how often it occurs.
Disney created the situation. Accepting reservations 6 months in advance. Suggesting DDP guests make ADRs or run the risk of not being able to eat a TS meal at meal time. Not allocating tables for walkups. Letting guests make more ADRs then they could possibly keep.
I'll go one step further. Is it possible Disney is "overselling" DDP? Assume I book a trip 30 days in advance. Should Disney offer me the dining plan if there isn't enough restaurant availability? I don't know how often, or if, it occurs but it's something to consider.