Then you obviously weren't very physically fit.![]()
![]()
I haven't been physically fit since my sophomore year in high school. That was the last year we were required to take PE.


Then you obviously weren't very physically fit.![]()
![]()


A sweet thread about an actress & her pregnancy/fiancé is now a commentary about pre-marital sex & how thin is too thin.
Physical conditioning reduces body fat, leaving a higher percentage of muscle-mass. A 5'3" woman in superior physical condition, as one would be after the rigorous physical training leading up to the filming of such a physically taxing role, would not necessarily be significantly underweight at 95 pounds, even if that number is to be believed.
Do we know what Portman weighed during filming? I could care less about Mila Kunis. Even if Portman was slightly underweight it is not emaciated. Emaciated is what you see in allied films while they were liberating concentration camps, not needing to put on 5 or 10 pounds.
Personally what I find attractive are athletic body types like Emma Snowsill (5'3" and 108), Kara Goucher (5'7" and 120), or Miranda Carfrae (5'3.5" and 115). They aren't size 14's but they also aren't emaciated. If Portman who is about 5'3" was under 100lbs she probably was a little underweight but I still wouldn't call it emaciated.
I also find it funny that everyone tries to make an actress losing weight out to be some sort of commentary on societal norms but when Adrian Brody did it for the Pianist it was just an actor losing a lot of weight for a part. Odd.

I've never heard of any of those women, but you know real women don't look like a magazine cover, right?![]()
Of course. All three of them have pages and pages of live pictures done during or just after competitions if you are implying they are always photoshopped when photographed.
I think she is saying the average woman looks nothing like these ladies do. Unless they are passionate about fitness or have a disorder. I agree, passion wanes and disorders are dangerous. Life comes in seasons.
I agree, the average doesn't. I was just using them as examples of people who are not underweight but don't weigh all that much more than Portman did if she was around 100 pounds for that movie (in Kara's case you have to adjust for the height).
I do run in some fitness based circles though and see that while the average person won't be able to maintain that level of fitness plenty of people who live normal lives do. Every weekend normal people line up for marathons or other races and many of them are in pretty darn good shape. Even the Ironman World Championship (which Miranda won this year) is run by way more average people (age groupers) than professionals.
I find it a bit odd though that people are so willing to come one here and talk about how disgusting or awful Natalie Portman looks for being what, 10 or 15 pounds underweight but if anyone says that <insert any celebrity here> looks disgusting because they packed on 10 or 15 pounds all of a sudden they would be fat bashers. Seems a bit hypocritical doesn't it?
Most posters on the Dis can probably relate better to Molly from M&M rather than Natalie Portman or even the athletes you linked. It's that simple.

Who is Molly from M&M?
I've seen this discussion before. Natalie Portman is just a tiny person. I had a friend like that who was thin no matter how much she ate and could she ever eat! She gained weight once she had a child so maybe Ms. Portman will do the same.