Narcoosee's or Flying Fish?

[Wendydagny]

Or both?

Right now I have an ADR for both, but I'm over on dining credits. I don't care and will just pay OOP at our least expensive restaurants. But I am concerned they are too similar. We are also doing signature meals at Jiko and Cali Grill.

I could switch to a dinner at Kona or the wave, or move our epcot adr's around and do a Le Cellier lunch.

 

[Pakey]

I think Flying Fish is leaps and bounds better than Narcoosees. After my last two disappointing meals at Narcoosees, I think price is the only reason it's a signature.

Flying Fish is my favorite of the restaurants on the dining plan and we have had consistently good meals there.

 

[Colleen27]

Flying Fish, no question.

Narcoosees was pretty good but not great; the lobster fans in our party loved it while the rest of us were rather unimpressed, and the service was on the slow/inattentive side. I think the location/view and the lobster options elevate it to signature status even though the rest of the offerings aren't quite at the same level. They do, however, serve my very favorite Disney dessert - the almond crusted cheesecake.

Flying Fish, on the other hand, was all around wonderful - fresh, well-prepared fish & seafood, attentive, thoughtful service, and such a charming atmosphere.

 

[wcpamotm]

I like Narcoosee's (we're going there on our upcoming trip) - but I think Flying Fish is one of the best Disney restaurants anywhere!

 

[Wendydagny]

So keeping flying fish. Check.

Would you keep Narcoosee's, or sub with the wave or kona cafe?

 

[Sparrow624]

If you like lobster...Narcoosee's is great! If not, everything else on the menu is "ok." MY wife enjoyed the chicken there, but for the price...

Yachtsman is much better.

 

[kat3668]

Flying Fish for sure!!! I still dream of the scallops I had there, I've never eaten anywhere as good as FF before!

 

[cmesq61]

I think FF wins handsdown, and I would substitute the Wave in a heartbeat!