PrincessInOz
Thanks for my avatar, Mary Jo!
- Joined
- Feb 8, 2010
- Messages
- 108,022
Hey Shuttergirl. Hoping that you're still lurking here. Can you tell me what camera you have? I've seen your GORGEOUS photos; so I'm assuming that you have a dSLR (and an upmarket one at that). Looking at your site, I would think that you're a proper pro-photographer c.f. a pro-sumer (or a wannabe like me).
I'm in the market for something - I've been lurking in the photography section, which is turning out to be an expensive pastime. Thinking about the new Canon 550D.
We have an old Minolta SLR and have 2 standard compacts, one clicky and the other one a little more up market (I did say we are wannabe's
). We've been thinking about upgrading to the dSLR for a while. Because of this link with Minolta, we're also looking at the Sony Alpha (we have an existing 20-80mm lens that would fit).
Nikons are almost out of the picture for us - we had a play with the 5000; and it didn't fit our hands as well as the Canon.
I know I could have PM'd you; but I thought that there may be a couple of other Aussies interested and might want to add their comments and inputs as well.
(Heather - this means you, too, if you're looking at this thread and feel inclined to).
I've also got a thread going with the Pro-sumers on the Photography section. I'm after thoughts on buying via internet vs shops, and this one is more relevant to Aussies.
I know we can buy "grey market" cameras off the internet at a fraction of the cost cf the approved supplies.
Do you know what the performance is of the Canons (any of them) and whether it makes a difference not to have the "official" Canon warranty or not? So I guess the better question is - anyone here have problems with their Canon, which requires them to return to manufacturer for fixing?
Does it matter if the internet provider has a warranty that uses a service company that isn't Canon approved...but would appear that the warranty matches the Canon one?
Am I better off sticking with the Sony Alpha (and I haven't researched the international warranty positioning of the Sony Alpha as much as I have with the Canon's)?
I'm in the market for something - I've been lurking in the photography section, which is turning out to be an expensive pastime. Thinking about the new Canon 550D.
We have an old Minolta SLR and have 2 standard compacts, one clicky and the other one a little more up market (I did say we are wannabe's
). We've been thinking about upgrading to the dSLR for a while. Because of this link with Minolta, we're also looking at the Sony Alpha (we have an existing 20-80mm lens that would fit).Nikons are almost out of the picture for us - we had a play with the 5000; and it didn't fit our hands as well as the Canon.
I know I could have PM'd you; but I thought that there may be a couple of other Aussies interested and might want to add their comments and inputs as well.
(Heather - this means you, too, if you're looking at this thread and feel inclined to).
I've also got a thread going with the Pro-sumers on the Photography section. I'm after thoughts on buying via internet vs shops, and this one is more relevant to Aussies.
I know we can buy "grey market" cameras off the internet at a fraction of the cost cf the approved supplies.
Do you know what the performance is of the Canons (any of them) and whether it makes a difference not to have the "official" Canon warranty or not? So I guess the better question is - anyone here have problems with their Canon, which requires them to return to manufacturer for fixing?
Does it matter if the internet provider has a warranty that uses a service company that isn't Canon approved...but would appear that the warranty matches the Canon one?
Am I better off sticking with the Sony Alpha (and I haven't researched the international warranty positioning of the Sony Alpha as much as I have with the Canon's)?
, well several of them actually. The one I use for the business is the Canon 5D MkII, big dollars and I'm not all that sure I love it, hehe. My back up camera is the Canon 5D, which I love. I only got the MkII because my 5D started playing up and even though it was still under warranty it was going to take 8 weeks to be repaired so I had no choice but to buy another newer one.
. So I took my 3rd back up camera, the Canon 30D. Great camera and that baby got banged around on that trip, my husband was horrified at how often I knocked it on doorways, tables, you name it, I banged it on something. Mainly because I had it slung over my arm most of the time, and not in the bag. Another reason I wanted to take it was that it has a built in flash, which my better cameras don't and frankly I just didn't have the energy to lug around a big flash for the few occasions I would need it.
