It is relevant in the sense that a big initiative for MM+/FP+ was to put upward pressure on guest spending in the parks
Are you trying to demonstrate a legit plan, or just snub Disney? I could easily demonstrate a plan that involves spending $0 in any park. Just eat a healthy breakfast at home, pocket a granola bar, and leave and stop for food when you're hungry. This would be easily repeatable and never cost a penny, and it would apply at Disney, SeaWorld, Universal, Great America, anywhere. These places all put upward pressure on guest spending.
For example... if I "save $1000/mo by no longer shopping at Albertsons" because I don't like that they implement a system that tracks my purchases... but instead I spend $1100 shopping at Safeway... or even $900 at Safeway, I have not saved $1000. I'm +$100 or -$100. So your thread is titled:
More for Less. So are you indeed
getting more while
spending less? That is the question.
In order to conclude that one can get more for less by following this, one should be able to demonstrate that he enjoyed more (by whatever means you wish to compare what one gets out of a vacation). And it should be done for less.
So far, we have...
Baseline: Week onsite at a Value resort, 7-day pass, Hopper,
DDP.
Proposal: Week offsite at Rosen. Disney AP. Uni AP. Car Rental. Gas.
$100/day for food was your budget, however on two days you've definitely busted this cap, and on the other days you'd have to eat darn cheap to pull off $100 for a family of 3 eating at places like Chilis or Universal.
That Baseline is $3107. That is for a week at Pop, 7-Day Hoppers, and DDP for 3. If you prefer to compare to a Moderate (depends what Rosen is more like)... then the baseline is $3348, which is the same week in CSR. So the real question is can you pull off that plan that you have described in detail, for under $3k or so?
Now I think in your DAY X plans, I am pretty sure that you are getting more. I mean you have described some awesome, action-packed days hitting up 6 theme parks and driving all around Florida. However, and this is key to your premise,
I'm not sure you've demonstrated the "for less".