Cafeen
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Jul 24, 2009
- Messages
- 4,852
I thought about it, but then figured I might be going overboardAll except the wristband thing.![]()
![]()

Speaking about going overboard...here I go!
Actually, this has nothing to do with Newton's 3rd law. This is all about inertia (1st law). Inertia is why you feel like you're floating when dropped, and why you feel crunched into your seat when it goes the other way. At the point between the two, there is not nearly enough force to throw you up in the air (never mind the 10 feet or so from floor to ceiling). Both objects (the boy and the ride) would have to be traveling far faster than the ride is capable of. Now, if the boy was made out of rubber (e.g. a superball) it may be possible since the energy would be stored in the rubber better (compression then decompression), but humans are pretty squishy and most of that energy is absorbed by our squishiness (crumple zones on cars have the same effect).Wow, really. Your statement is the epitome of either the downfall of our public education system or your total lack of regard for those of us who work so hard to create safe environments.
Have you ever heard of Isaac Newton. Every reaction has an opposite reaction.
Mostly, his experiments were done in the horizontal position, but his theory also works in the vertical position.
A person sitting on the floor in a "cage, unrestrained" can be dropped very quickly and stopped short, will suddenly go upward. On the upside, that person will basically be hurled upward in the opposite direction, hitting their head on the top of the cage and snapping their neck.
Hence, restraints.
The fact that those in the seats aren't pushed up against the seat belts at this point proves this entirely, we're pushed against the seats instead (due to inertia and our crumpley-bodies). The boy would simply stick to the floor. It also doesn't really "stop short". The cushion of air that collects below the vehicle slows it down and allows for quite a bit of energy absorption there as well. It may not be that noticeable on the ride, but it's certainly there.
Now, if the speeds WERE high enough, it would be a concern, but at that point there'd be concerns about everyone, not just the boy on the floor.
I'd venture to guess that, barring balance issues, the entire ride could be theoretically experienced without belts and with handles instead. However, lots like to let go, so belts enable them to do just that. Plus it keeps them from doing stupid stuff (same reason Splash has bars now, it's not because you may fall out on the drop). In fact, thinking about it, it's probably why most of the restrained rides have restraints...at least at Disney. (RnRC & Dinosaur are the only ones I can think of where restraints would really be needed for mechanical reasons...)
If the ride were that forceful, lots of people would be walking out with broken or badly bruised legs and passing out from the positive Gs when it goes back up. I don't think that's happened (well, on that ride, MS is differentFirst of all it isn't that violent of a reaction! you don't go all the way up to the ceiling for heavens sake!! Geeze do you know how much force you would have to be under to go all the way to the ceiling? I have ridden that with the seat belt completely loose and you raise up about 4 inches, tops. Remember the old seat with just the tiny belt? you really think if it was such a forceful ride that you would "go to the ceiling" anybody in this lawyer society would have been basically unrestrained.
My point was TOT takes place in a cage, there is no way to fall out of the ride as some people think, as in falling all the way out of the ride.
)