Marijuana

Should Marijuana be legalized for any purpose?

  • Yes, but only for medicinal purposes

  • Yes, for all. Will cut down on overcrowding in prisons

  • Absolutely not. It's a drug and is dangerous.

  • I have never thought about it, it doesn't apply to me or anyone I know.

  • I don't care


Results are only viewable after voting.
Amsterdam - They are in the process of closing all pot cafes to tourists, due to high crime rates.

I have not read anywhere that this decision was based on the crime rate. I did a google search and read various articles and still can't find anything. Do you have a link to anything that supports this? I would be interested in seeing what type of crimes they are dealing with as a result of the drug use by tourists.








How are you going to regulate something that comes across both borders in droves. They make tunnels, are you people nuts? The cost of trying to regulate it will be absurd because now the government will be losing money on it in the form of tax.

I hate the smell of it and don't care to have to smell it or be around it, cigarettes are bad enough, bleh!
How the heck do you lose money collecting taxes? I mean, I know the government can screw up anything, but even this? :rotfl:

And, as related to the medicinal part of the question, all of the recreational users are making it very problematic for the medicinal users to get what they need. Canada is having huge issues with this, as people are selling their licenses, doctors are fudging documents, and medicinal users are giving it away to friends/family.
Seems like, from your explanation, the people who need it for medical purposes are their own worst enemies. They are the ones selling their medical cards and giving their supply away to family and friends. How is that making it difficult for them to get it?

Doesn't sound like the recreational users are the problem at all. Now, if there were stealing pot from medicinal users or stealing their cards, I could understand how they would be the problem.
 
I think its just a matter of time before its legal across the board. Some genius presidential candidate will run and win on this platform within the next 20 years IMO. Just like FDR did with alcohol prohibition. I think in this day and age criminalizing marijuana is silly and more destructive than if it were legal. Any argument you can make for criminalizing alcohol could be made ten times over vs. pot. I've never heard of anyone killing anyone on the highway because of being intoxicated by pot. I think its silly and just due to coward politicians too paralyzed by fear of offending someone why this hasn't already happened.
 
I have not read anywhere that this decision was based on the crime rate. I did a google search and read various articles and still can't find anything. Do you have a link to anything that supports this? I would be interested in seeing what type of crimes they are dealing with as a result of the drug use by tourists.


Seems like, from your explanation, the people who need it for medical purposes are their own worst enemies. They are the ones selling their medical cards and giving their supply away to family and friends. How is that making it difficult for them to get it?

Doesn't sound like the recreational users are the problem at all. Now, if there were stealing pot from medicinal users or stealing their cards, I could understand how they would be the problem.

Here you go. Not sure what articles you are reading, but every legitimate article source, mentions the crime aspect. Doesn't get into specific stats though:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4319789...on_travel/t/high-times-amsterdam-not-so-fast/

http://dispensary-business-news.com...ws-mean-for-medical-marijuana-efforts-in-u-s/

Because marijuana is a recreational drug, that is now being used to treat some medical issues, I am concerned about the whole legalization of it. I am still conflicted about it, as the recreation aspect is what clouds those decisions. I have read lots of experts who say legalizing will make better, and other experts say it won't. I am still reading up on it myself, but I know that as of late, there have been lots of articles here about the major problems our country is having with medical marijuana: huge red tape for doctors, patients selling it, and medical marijuana licenses being sold to recreational users, are some the problems.

Not sure what the solution is for those who feel they may benefit from a medicinal standpoint? Perhaps they have to look at a different way of dispensing and distributing to those patients? I totally agree that they should not be treated as criminals, but not sure what the best solution is?

Tiger
 
Oh please, if you think someone saying "are you people nuts?" amounts to unfriendly name calling then you really must get out more.

ford family

What does it take to be nice for some people? Good Lord.
But I get out enough, thank you very much. I guess I just run into nicer people than you and the PP. :)
 

Here you go. Not sure what articles you are reading, but every legitimate article source, mentions the crime aspect. Doesn't get into specific stats though:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4319789...on_travel/t/high-times-amsterdam-not-so-fast/

http://dispensary-business-news.com...ws-mean-for-medical-marijuana-efforts-in-u-s/

Because marijuana is a recreational drug, that is now being used to treat some medical issues, I am concerned about the whole legalization of it. I am still conflicted about it, as the recreation aspect is what clouds those decisions. I have read lots of experts who say legalizing will make better, and other experts say it won't. I am still reading up on it myself, but I know that as of late, there have been lots of articles here about the major problems our country is having with medical marijuana: huge red tape for doctors, patients selling it, and medical marijuana licenses being sold to recreational users, are some the problems.

Not sure what the solution is for those who feel they may benefit from a medicinal standpoint? Perhaps they have to look at a different way of dispensing and distributing to those patients? I totally agree that they should not be treated as criminals, but not sure what the best solution is?

Tiger

Thanks for the link Tiger. I had already read the one at MSBNC. I was hoping you had found an article with more details on the "crime" aspect. I'm sure there is crime in Amsterdam, just thought they would give more details in regards to what they felt was tourist and pot related.

I would think though that this would actually increase the crime rate since people are going to be out on the street now, selling to the tourists that want to get high.
 
Thanks for the link Tiger. I had already read the one at MSBNC. I was hoping you had found an article with more details on the "crime" aspect. I'm sure there is crime in Amsterdam, just thought they would give more details in regards to what they felt was tourist and pot related.

I would think though that this would actually increase the crime rate since people are going to be out on the street now, selling to the tourists that want to get high.

That is a good point, but it would depend upon how their justice system works. If it is heavy handed against tourists, then that might be a deterrant, but not sure about the actual citizens? All of the articles I've read, said that people are very surprised by this, as Amsterdam is the most liberal in terms of pot smoking, yet they are going in a totally different direction now. Why is that? They must feel that they need to try something new, as perhaps the problems from tourists is now to a point that they don't want to deal with it any longer?

It would be interesting to see actual stats and such, but I can't find any as of yet.

Tiger
 
I based my answer on exactly what you wrote. I never said you smoke everyday, as you particularly mentioned that you didn't. Despite you feeling otherwise, it is still problematic (you can argue with our public health nurses) that you feel the need to smoke up to "unwind" - regardless of whether it's daily (although that would be an addiction), or monthly, the reason/s you smoke up is what we deal with in our students.
.
.
.
And I absolutely would ask someone how their judgment is after consuming a glass of wine, as alcohol is a drug, just like marijuana is, so it affects your brain, plain and simple. Come on! That is why you smoke up in the first place. If it weren't, you woudn't waste your time. A hot fudge sundae does not affect your brain, by the way. :rotfl:
.
.
.
You feel that smoking marijuana occassionally is ok, and compare to other drugs, but my question is this: why do people need drugs (medicinal aside) in the first place? My students do the same thing - they try and convince us that it's ok to smoke up as it's natural, and cocaine or heroine are so much worse. Why are these the only choices?

No one *needs* recreational drugs (whether pot, alcohol, or caffeine). But lots of people *like* them. :confused3

Your using the world "need" over and over implies some sort of dependence. I imagine if you are like 99.9% of the population you have an enjoy sex every once in awhile. But if say that you *need* it--well doesn't that imply that you are a sex addict of some sort? That you can't control yourself? That you will do anything to get sex?

But this kind of dependence is simply not the case for most people who use pot, alcohol, or caffeine. Just like sex or chocolate or love or laughter most people who enjoy these drugs don't need them, but enjoy how they make them feel.

Speaking of how these things make us feel, I don't know exactly what you mean by "affect the brain" but surely you don't mean cause some kind of mood/emotion change, prime the brain to behave differently, cause a release of hormones or other chemicals that effect behavior, etc. because then of course a hot fudge sundae (along with sex, love, humor, etc.) ABSOLUTELY changes the brain. (That's why we like those things so much!)

Of course, all that said I have no doubt that chronic use of pot (especially if smoked) can have significant negative side effects. But I don't see anyone here advocating heavy use of any drug as a good idea. And when it comes to occasional use I find it hard to see how pot is different than any other thing that I do cause pleasant feelings knowing that there are some risks.

I had casual sex before I was married (always safely as I could). Best idea if you want to avoid an STD? No, but I like sex so I took the risk. I eat A LOT of chocolate all the time. Good idea to eat fat/sugar laden items? Of course not! But I really, really like chocolate, so I take the risk. Before I developed such bad heartburn I used to drink 4-5 drinks on a weekend night. Best thing for my liver? Nope. But I took the risk. I didn't *need* to do any of these things; I did them because I like the feeling of being tipsy, the climax of sex, and the taste of and endorphins released by chocolate. And for the last 3 or 4 years I have also eaten about one pot brownie a year on a special occasion. I take the risk because I like it. And really, it seems absolutely absurd to me that of all of those things it is only the pot brownie which is illegal. How could one pot brownie per year be anything but the least dangerous (by far!) of any of the things I listed?
 
Thanks for the link Tiger. I had already read the one at MSBNC. I was hoping you had found an article with more details on the "crime" aspect. I'm sure there is crime in Amsterdam, just thought they would give more details in regards to what they felt was tourist and pot related.

I would think though that this would actually increase the crime rate since people are going to be out on the street now, selling to the tourists that want to get high.

Why would it increase the crime rate? People could bring their own without fear of going through the airport baggage check. Before 911, people that I know who traveled brought their own pot. They just put it in their checked luggage. No one wanted to risk buying pot in another city much less a foreign country. Are there risk takers who did and do that, yes but I'm willing to bet the majority did a BYOP.
 
No one *needs* recreational drugs (whether pot, alcohol, or caffeine). But lots of people *like* them. :confused3

Your using the world "need" over and over implies some sort of dependence. I imagine if you are like 99.9% of the population you have an enjoy sex every once in awhile. But if say that you *need* it--well doesn't that imply that you are a sex addict of some sort? That you can't control yourself? That you will do anything to get sex?

But this kind of dependence is simply not the case for most people who use pot, alcohol, or caffeine. Just like sex or chocolate or love or laughter most people who enjoy these drugs don't need them, but enjoy how they make them feel.

Speaking of how these things make us feel, I don't know exactly what you mean by "affect the brain" but surely you don't mean cause some kind of mood/emotion change, prime the brain to behave differently, cause a release of hormones or other chemicals that effect behavior, etc. because then of course a hot fudge sundae (along with sex, love, humor, etc.) ABSOLUTELY changes the brain. (That's why we like those things so much!)

Of course, all that said I have no doubt that chronic use of pot (especially if smoked) can have significant negative side effects. But I don't see anyone here advocating heavy use of any drug as a good idea. And when it comes to occasional use I find it hard to see how pot is different than any other thing that I do cause pleasant feelings knowing that there are some risks.

I had casual sex before I was married (always safely as I could). Best idea if you want to avoid an STD? No, but I like sex so I took the risk. I eat A LOT of chocolate all the time. Good idea to eat fat/sugar laden items? Of course not! But I really, really like chocolate, so I take the risk. Before I developed such bad heartburn I used to drink 4-5 drinks on a weekend night. Best thing for my liver? Nope. But I took the risk. I didn't *need* to do any of these things; I did them because I like the feeling of being tipsy, the climax of sex, and the taste of and endorphins released by chocolate. And for the last 3 or 4 years I have also eaten about one pot brownie a year on a special occasion. I take the risk because I like it. And really, it seems absolutely absurd to me that of all of those things it is only the pot brownie which is illegal. How could one pot brownie per year be anything but the least dangerous (by far!) of any of the things I listed?

THC is a psychoactive substance that alters the brain - if it didn't, then there would be no such thing as medical marijuana. Hot fudge sundaes are not psychoactive in nature. You can check out a myriad of links to explain the science of it. Since this thread is discussing medical marijuana, then suffice it to say, it does affect the brain, and that is why it's used to treat some pain.

We can agree to disagree on the need vs want aspect of recreational drugs. You do make a point though from a psychological perspective - if you say you need something, and cannot get by without it, then you may be classified as an addict. I see tons of coffee addicts in my teaching colleagues each day - some of them cannot go without their coffee, as they get crabby and moody, so their bodies do need the caffeine, and all of them will tell you that they are addicted to coffee.

As for street drugs, you are getting something from them, because if you weren't, you wouldn't waste your time doing them; therefore, in making that choice, you do feel the need to experience the mood altering affects of the drugs as they make you feel good. Candy and ice cream are not psychoactive in nature, but people could become addicted to eating too much of them. THC has now been connected to episodes of psychosis, and that is because of its psychoactive properties. We have a fab specialist working with us on dealing with the negative effects of pot usage in teenagers, and regardless of whether teens do it 1x a day, or 1x a year, we are trying to curb this, due to what can be some serious side effects, as well as serious burnout issues in teens. We are seeing mental health issues that are being pushed out by the pot - do some research and you will see what I am speaking about.

I am coming from this in a totally different perspective, as marijuana seems to be so popular in Canada. In regards to the medical issue, maybe some of you have a point, that making pot totally legal across the board, would be better for the medical users, but in my world, that also means that we are saying that it's ok to use street drugs in a recreational way as well, and that is not something I can agree on whatsoever.

I really do hope that the medical issue gets resolved in some way that is positive for those users who are struggling with terminal illness or severe pain.

Tiger
 
Legalize it, tax it and enforce DUIs.
Being the amount of debt we're in it seems like a money making option.
 
Why would it increase the crime rate? People could bring their own without fear of going through the airport baggage check. Before 911, people that I know who traveled brought their own pot. They just put it in their checked luggage. No one wanted to risk buying pot in another city much less a foreign country. Are there risk takers who did and do that, yes but I'm willing to bet the majority did a BYOP.

Because now you would have people (citizens) out illegally selling pot to the tourists. So, the selling and the purchasing of the drug would be against the law and you would have more people either being arrested or fined. Therefore the crime rate would go up. Now, whether or not this would increase the amounts of any type of violent crime, I have no idea.

I'm sure there are still people who manage to smuggle some pot on their flight, but with all the scanners and extra personal pat downs, I would not want to risk it.
 
Love this point. I have read so many good posts about how legalizing marijuana would actuallybenefit this country. Can someone in DC read this thread?
Let's get this going and start paying down that deficit and adding new jobs!:thumbsup2

You mention that drug abusers don't belong in prison with real criminals? That's a big freakin savings right there. I think it takes maybe an average of 30-40k a year to house, feed, clothe etc inmates. By lowering the prison population by only housing criminals, there is no telling how much money that would save both state and fed.
:thumbsup2 Totally agree. I think someone being in jail for marijuana is a bigger crime than what the person committed. I think its ridiculous to put someone in jail for pot. We are putting drug offenders in jail and letting child molesters and rapists out, yeah that makes a lot of sense. :rolleyes:
 
Because now you would have people (citizens) out illegally selling pot to the tourists. So, the selling and the purchasing of the drug would be against the law and you would have more people either being arrested or fined. Therefore the crime rate would go up. Now, whether or not this would increase the amounts of any type of violent crime, I have no idea.

I'm sure there are still people who manage to smuggle some pot on their flight, but with all the scanners and extra personal pat downs, I would not want to risk it.

Wait, if we legalize it here in the US, how would it be illegal to sell to tourists in the US? If they choose to bring into their own countries, then that's a crime committed in another country, not ours.
 
Wait, if we legalize it here in the US, how would it be illegal to sell to tourists in the US? If they choose to bring into their own countries, then that's a crime committed in another country, not ours.

Okay, I think we are talking about 2 separate things here. :lmao: I was referring to Amsterdam, and that due to them not allowing tourists in the cafes, that the locals would be out selling it to the tourists instead, thereby increasing crime in their city.

I see you were talking about the US and not Amsterdam.
 
okay, i think we are talking about 2 separate things here. :lmao: I was referring to amsterdam, and that due to them not allowing tourists in the cafes, that the locals would be out selling it to the tourists instead, thereby increasing crime in their city.

I see you were talking about the us and not amsterdam.

oops!
 
yes at least for medical reasons...I went to the neurologist and he under his breathe suggested it..I have epilepsy and he said it might help..since it is illegal here, I may explore other avenues to obtain it...
 
I've been around the cannabis wards at local psychiatry hospitals. I've seen the effect it can have. NOT cool. However, when needs must, such as in medical situations, the balance may tip.
 
If I may quote my research on the subject...

As a topic, psychosis is very taboo. It is never really talked about, let alone explored or investigated into by the general populace who, more often than not, erroneously think that it reflects a dissociative personality disorder, something that only affects approximately one percent of the populace (or between five and twenty percent of psychiatric in-patients). As a result, cannabis induced psychosis is not a well known topic area for most people, if known at all. In fact, in a recent survey carried out for the BBC, only 2% of youths understood that there were “health risks” associated with using the drug, whilst 79% of youths believed that cannabis was “safe”.

Psychotic symptoms, experienced in cases of schizophrenia, schizo-affective disorder and so on, can be best described as disconnections from reality, where an individual becomes withdrawn and deluded as to the state of the real world. Positive psychotic symptoms warp or over emphasise normal functions; for example, a patient may experience thought disorders whereby their thoughts and speech become disorganised and/or incoherent, exhibiting a loosening of associative abilities. Conversely, negative symptoms of psychosis diminish and reduce normal functioning; for example, a patient may experience avolition, whereby difficulties are found in achieving goals or targets, perhaps due to a lack of zest for life or a lack of social desires.

Psychosis is often used as a term for schizophrenia, a potentially elaborate disorder with many possible causes and treatments that affects roughly eleven in every thousand people. Most patients diagnosed with schizophrenia tend to fall into the category of undifferentiated schizophrenia, meaning that there is inadequate evidence to support the notion that the patient suffers from catatonic, disorganised or paranoid schizophrenia.

Catatonic schizophrenia “is characterised by various motor disturbances – bizarre, stationary poses maintained for many hours – and waxy flexibility, in which the persons limbs can be moulded into new positions, which are then maintained” [1]. People who suffer from this illness are often aware of the disorder and will willingly talk about the episodes they undergo. Disorganised schizophrenia is perhaps the most distressing strain of the disorder, exhibiting inappropriate emotion, disorganised thoughts and words. Finally, paranoid schizophrenia is best described as an inventive disorder. Patients will invent elaborate stories and fantasies that revolve around them and often go hand in hand with delusions of power, control and so on. The term “paranoid” is perhaps misleading, the common term meaning suspicious and hunted. Rather, patients are inventive and do not always possess a notion that they are being persecuted.

There are other psychotic disorders as well, such as the schizo-affective disorder, where patients exhibit both psychotic and affective (mood) disorders. There are also many other psychotic symptoms, too many to mention in fact. Briefly worth a mention, though, are delusions (falsely held beliefs, such as that one can fly) and hallucinations, (auditory, visual and so on), whereby the sufferor experiences sensation without stimulation – similar to the effects of many hallucinogenic drugs. One such drug is Cannabis.

Cannabis as a drug is available in two forms: Marijuana and Hashish and is usually smoked, although it can also be eaten. Marijuana is best likened to tobacco, being made up of dried leaves whilst Hashish is a derivative of the resin produced by the plant. Cannabis itself is rich in chemicals unique to itself known as cannabinoids. These chemicals include cannabidiol, cannabinol and various strains of tetrahydrocannabinol, one of which (delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol or “THC”) is thought to be primarily responsible for cannabis’ psychoactive properties. Cannabis also contains cannflavins and terpenoids, thought to be responsible for some of the more beneficial sides to the drug. THC itself is thought to affect appetite, sensation (auditory, visual and olfactory), concentration, relaxation levels and more.

Many animals, including humans, have two types of cannabinoid receptors, usually abbreviated and referred to as CB1 and CB2. It is the activation of these receptors that results in cannabis’ psychoactive effects. CB1 receptors are primarily found in the brain, specifically “in the mesolimbic and mesocortical pathways, both believed to be important for the development of schizophrenia (Ameri, 1999)” [2]; further to this, interaction between the CB1 receptors and the D2 dopamine receptors “has been documented in rats and monkeys (Meschler et al, 2001)” [3], suggesting a possible link in humans. CB2 receptors are primarily found in the immune system and are more responsible for the therapeutic effects of cannabis. Of the two receptors, THC appears to affect CB1 receptors more readily [4] and appears to be neuroprotective, mimicking the neurotransmitter anandamide which binds with said cannabinoid receptors in the brain. Interestingly, THC remains in the body for a long period after it was first administered, standing at 30% after a week.

Cannabis use can result in an increased awareness of sensation, an altered mindstate, inhibited motor control, relaxation, paranoia and so on by regulating dopamine levels within the brain (dopamine being a chemical responsible for, amongst other things, movement, cognition, motivation and perceived reward). Cannabis use can also seemingly result in psychotic disorders. Substance abuse itself can cause psychotic symptoms, but it can also seemingly cause psychotic episodes subsequently.

Chronic symptoms may occur following cannabis abuse, including the so called “Amotivational Syndrome” which details apathy, amnesia, loss of motivation and so on. These symptoms can unfortunately be permanent and there is an accumulating body of evidence to support the notion that smaller amounts of the drug over a period of time will do just as much damage as a large dose over a smaller period of time. Cannabis has also been linked to depression and anxiety [5] and more often than not disturbances of a psychotic nature within which cannabis is considered to have played a part are accompanied by an affective or mood disorder, most commonly a form of depression.

There is a “growing body of evidence that suggests cannabis may be a causal factor in the development of psychosis” [6]. However, it would be erroneous to say that cannabis is necessary or even sufficient for a psychosis to develop; many people develop psychotic disorders without ever consuming cannabis and many cannabis users lead psychosis free lives; correlation does not equal causation, as it were. A study (Fergusson et al, 2004) “suggested that people who used cannabis daily increased their chances of psychotic symptoms by 1.6-1.8 times” [7]; a study in 2002 based on research between 1970 to 1996 (Zammit et al) found that “the risk of developing schizophrenia was increased (odds ratio = 1.9)” [8] for cannabis users, with heavier users (use of cannabis more than 50 times prior to assessment) suffering an odds ratio of 6.7; the authors estimated that 13% of reported schizophrenia cases could have been avoided had cannabis use been nil. Further to this research, it was found that cannabis users were three times (300%) more likely to report psychotic symptoms three years after an initial appraisal [9], a significant result even considering the amount of compounding variables (the experiment was a naturalistic observation). Professor Robin Murray of the Maudsley Hospital (Kings College Psychiatry Unit), London, concluded that people were approximately 4.5 times more likely to be schizophrenic at 26 if they were regular cannabis users at the age of 15. Another researcher, one Professor John Henry, clinical toxicologist at Imperial College London, was quoted as claiming that research had shown that people with a certain genetic makeup were ten times more likely to suffer from schizophrenia should they use the drug at some point in their life. Earlier research claimed that “the chance of being schizophrenic at a later date was 6 times as high in the group using cannabis than in the group not using it” [10] [11]. Finally, another case study, Boydell (2003), “concluded that the incidence of schizophrenia had doubled in thirty years in Camberwell, South East London (Boydell, 2003)” [12], seemingly going hand in hand with the notion that cannabis is both stronger and more widespread than has been the case for decades.

Research indicates that early cannabis use puts users at greater risk of a psychotic illness later on in life, more so than more adult users [13]. Typically, people with a predisposition towards psychotic illnesses are affected far more profoundly than those without, although even those who are at little risk of developing a psychotic illness are still more at risk than had they not consumed cannabis [14]; it has been found that “patients with previous cannabis abuse had significantly more rehospitalizations, tended to worse psychosocial functioning” and were more hostile and generally disturbed [15].

Concerns over the safety of cannabis are not new. In 1997 it was suggested that cannabis use could emphasise tendencies towards psychotic and affective illnesses by W. Hall and N. Solowij [16]. Now there are “suggestions that in a small number of cases Cannabis is capable of precipitating psychosis” [17] in a “characteristic manner” [18] where there has been no history of psychological illness, personally or family. Then the suggestions that cannabis “caused schizophrenia” in certain cases “especially in young people poorly able to cope with stress” [19] started to flow.

Cannabis as a drug is now more concentrated than it was when research started and as such results obtained early on in research are now skewed. A review by the British Lung Association said that cannabis available now was approximately fifteen times more powerful than cannabis available three decades ago; in other words, less needs to be smoked to obtain the same effects.

There are problems, however, in determining whether these particular correlations are in fact links of causation. There are further difficulties in conducting research into the subject; patients may not confess to cannabis use for a variety of reasons, including fear of prosecution or fear of reaction or may not mention it, being under the assumption that it does not matter for one reason or another. Research into the field could be likened to structionalism, bearing many of the problems such as subjective bias; researchers essentially have to rely on reported symptoms and due to ethical reasons, experimentation on humans with a potentially harmful drug is out of the question.

Cannabis has, therefore, been linked to psychotic illnesses; however, correlation is not always causation and clearly more research is needed to detect any clear causal relationships between the two. So far, over thirty research projects have tackled the subject and as a result it is reasonably safe to say that there is a firm correlation between cannabis and psychosis.

[1] Carlson, Martin & Buskist, Psychology
[2] Rethink Organisation; Submission to the Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs, 2005
[3] Rethink Organisation; Submission to the Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs, 2005
[4] Heustis et al, 2001
[5] Andrew Johns, 2001, Psychiatric effects of cannabis, Br J Psychiatry, vol. 178, pp.116-122
[6] Rethink Organisation; Cannabis Overview 2005
[7] Rethink Organisation; Cannabis Overview 2005
[8] Rethink Organisation; Submission to the Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs, 2005
[9] Van Os et al, 2002
[10] Andréasson, S et al., LANCET, 1987, (ii), 1483-5
[11] Statistics Institute, Kings College London
[12] Rethink Organisation; Submission to the Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs, 2005
[13] Arsenault, L., Cannon, M., Poulton, R., Murray, R., Caspi, A., Moffit, T.E., 2002, ‘Cannabis use in adolescence and risk for adult psychosis: longitudinal prospective study, British Medical Journal vol. 325, pp. 1212-1213
[14] Henquet C. et al, 2005, ‘Prospective study of cannbis use, predisposition for psychosis, and psychotic symptoms in young people’, British Meidcal Journal, vol 330, 1 Jan, pp 11-13
[15] Caspari D, “Cannabis and Schizophrenia: Results of a follow-up Study” Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 1999;249(1):45-9
[16] Hall W, Solowij N, “ Long-term Cannabis use and Mental Health “ 1997 British Journal of Psychiatry, August, 171:107-8
[17] Dr Brian Boettcher, Consultant Psychiatrist, Shelton Hospital
[18] Hall A, Degenhardt, “Cannabis and Psychosis” Australian National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, Presented at The Inaugural International Cannabis and Psychosis Conference 1999 , Melbourne 16-17 February 1999
[19] van Amsterdam JG, van der Laan JW, Slangen JL, “Cognitive and psychotic effects after cessation of chronic cannabis use “ Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 1998 Mar 7;142(10):504-8
 

New Posts


Disney Vacation Planning. Free. Done for You.
Our Authorized Disney Vacation Planners are here to provide personalized, expert advice, answer every question, and uncover the best discounts. Let Dreams Unlimited Travel take care of all the details, so you can sit back, relax, and enjoy a stress-free vacation.
Start Your Disney Vacation
Disney EarMarked Producer






DIS Facebook DIS youtube DIS Instagram DIS Pinterest DIS Tiktok DIS Twitter

Add as a preferred source on Google

Back
Top Bottom