leiaorgana
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Jan 25, 2015
- Messages
- 1,062
I agree it would be very difficult to do Han-Leia-Luke scene, so that’s likely why it won’t happen. I just know I have read tons of the ST reviews that consider that omission the single biggest mistake the ST made. Is Favreau bold enough to try and right that wrong? The buzz that would create would be insane and likely top what he did at the end of season 2 of Mando. It likely would ensure that every single OT fan that hears about that would go buy a ticket.So.... Where do folks think this is going to go....
Polymer wants some Luke-Leia Han action. Without some recasting i think that will be difficult. I admit, part of why I did not like Solo is because it was not Harrision as Han. Some people are firmly entrenched in my mind in a role and it is hard for me to accept a recast.
I wonder how much of Thrawn they will try to wrap up in season 2 of Ahsoka... or if that will spill over to the Mandaloiran season 4. I seem to remember there will be S4 of Mando first before the movie?
Also if I remember correctly.... in the Mandalorian, we are in the middle of reclaiming Mandalore... so I assume that will be the focus of S4 and not Thrawn?
I’ll just jump in and say when I’ve referred to Luke Skywalker “man babies” in the past I was meaning the YouTube grifters such as SW The*ry and his asinine clique and followers. Apologies if you took it the wrong way Polymer.
That’s fair.Well, look, I don't make it a habit to try to correct everybody here. You have sometimes asked why you get those reactions, so I am happy to tell you. Maybe you are not a misogynist, but you have posted things that certainly sound that way. That's all I can say. I do find terms like "man baby" and "incel" counter productive. Honestly, I think if you toned down the harsh rehetoric, people wouldn't react to you with harsh words.
I've been there, you know. I'm a comic book fan, and in a comic book store, "discussions" are common. I learned very early that passionate ranting would not entreat people to respect your opinion. You have to make a true argument, using evidence and reason. It's not enough to say, "Character X would never...." You have to articulate why. You're never going to actually change anyones mind, but you can demonstrate where you're coming from and try to understand where they are coming from too. That will create healthy, interesting, and hopefully fun debate.
That's just my two cents anyway.
and then complain bitterly about how it is not up to snuff.....I agree it would be very difficult to do Han-Leia-Luke scene, so that’s likely why it won’t happen. I just know I have read tons of the ST reviews that consider that omission the single biggest mistake the ST made. Is Favreau bold enough to try and right that wrong? The buzz that would create would be insane and likely top what he did at the end of season 2 of Mando. It likely would ensure that every single OT fan that hears about that would go buy a ticket.
That’s fair.
And from now on I won’t use “Steaming Pile of Poo” or “Hot Garbage” to describe TLJ. I instead will use something along the lines of horribly written, directed, and produced in my opinion.
and then complain bitterly about how it is not up to snuff.....
Just not interested in rehashing movies that are done. I think attempting to rewrite a series just to appease a set of fans (who likely will not ever be appeased) is a losing effort.... and a waste of some great characters and storylines
But I have listed all that word for word before with you and you still don’t like my opinion on the matter. I have literally given you 30 bullet points on specifically what I didn’t think worked in Rian Johnson’s movie.Well, that's a start. But you shouldn't jsut say, "The Last Jedi is horribly written." That's not constructive criticism. Instead, something like, "The Last Jedi is plagued with story issues, particularly in the jarring changes made to returning characters from the Original Trilogy...." Then give reasons. And you don't have to say it every time you mention the movie either.![]()
Yeah, some fans will never be happy - they don't want to be. Personally, I would like to see Special Editions of all of the movies to smooth out a few rough edges - no doubt the sequels could benefit from this. I'd be inclined to include a bunch of things to make the fans heads explode. Like, "Han shot first?" Nah, I'd redo that scene into a 5 minute CGI bar fight, where Han and Greedo wrestle on the floor and knock over tables. In the end the end up right back where they were and Han shoots him. "Sorry about the mess." I'd do that just to watch the outrage!![]()
But I have listed all that word for word before with you and you still don’t like my opinion on the matter. I have literally given you 30 bullet points on specifically what I didn’t think worked in Rian Johnson’s movie.
You don’t like when I say things like “Luke would never do that”, but it is really that simple. I feel like I grew up with and know Luke very well. I felt it was way out of character and so did Luke Skywalker (Mark Hamill). I get that you don’t agree, but I see “Luke would never do that” as a very logical rejection of his haphazard and jarring story arc in TLJ. The fact that so many fans had an issue with the way Luke was portrayed seems to suggest my theory has credibility.
I’m want a great movie that is true to Lucas’s original vision and tone that made us all fall in love with the galaxy far far away. If anyone can do this I believe it is Jon Favreau.
I don’t think I personally know a single person or have ever heard a person say that they want SW to be bad. Well maybe Mike Zero, but does anyone actually listen to that clickbait chaser?
People take it all too seriously.
I was 5 when I saw Star Wars* in 1977, in 70mm and on the largest screen in my state, and I napped through 20 minutes of it. Went through, and relished, the prime '77-'83 Star Wars mania, suffered through the Holiday Special like every other '70s boy, and stayed a fan ... right up until the Ewoks on Jedi ruined it for me. Ever since I've been a passive fan at best. When people go into a deep dive of the Star Wars galaxy and stories ("the mysticism"), I find the first excuse to get up and leave. As a USC cinema alumnus, I've been fortunate enough hang out with Geo. Lucas a few times at campus events, and thankfully the topic of Star Wars was never breached. I can remember dicussing the Ronald Colman film Lost Horizons, John Wayne's Hondo, Lucasarts in general, and Howard the Duck comic books (not the movie).
As for Mando, we've enjoyed it, but it's really obvious the target is 12-13yo boys. The acting is melodramatic and hammy, the plots are copied from old movies, and action scenes are messy, over-the-top, and over-extended.
*I still don't call it "A New Hope"
1-6 is Lucas’s original vision. Use that as your road map and guiding principles of lore and you will do well. Don’t break that canon and don’t deconstruct legacy characters to build up your new ones. That’s what I mean. Like I said Favreau stands a better chance than anyone of doing this, why? Because he did just that for two seasons of Mando. He “gets it” is what I am saying.What exactly is "Lucas's original vision" though? I mean, would even the man himself know or stick to that. He hasn't in the past you know, which is why all the fans turned on him. It's so funny that he is held up as a paragon now when he was reviled previously.
1-6 is Lucas’s original vision. Use that as your road map and guiding principles of lore and you will do well. Don’t break that canon and don’t deconstruct legacy characters to build up your new ones. That’s what I mean. Like I said Favreau stands a better chance than anyone of doing this, why? Because he did just that for two seasons of Mando. He “gets it” is what I am saying.
Rian Johnson did not “get it” in my opinion.
Rian Johnson does a great job with his who done it movies, but was simply a very poor choice to direct a SW sequel in my humble opinion.