Lisa loves Pooh
DIS Legend
- Joined
- Apr 18, 2004
- Messages
- 40,449
I agree. I think that it is irrefutable that one fares better in park #2 under FP+. So has all of this just become about hopping? If a FP+ person spends only the afternoon in Epcot with FPs all lined up, they do OK. They get a FP for Soarin' and a 90 minute wait for TT. The FP- person who hops to Epcot probably gets a 90 minute wait at both. But the FP+ person who shows up at Epcot at 10:00 gets a FP for one and a 90 minute wait for the other, and the FP- person gets a FP for both. Different touring styles. Different results. It is hard to make the point that FP+ is superior. It is superior under certain conditions.
No--not all about hopping. Took that track she it seems you misunderstood the guest's plans in their cited example.
As stated--it works for those who want a relaxed morning and just show up late--take the midday break, or whatever.
It removes variables and inserts the ability to control your schedule.
Ride breakdowns are moot as they happened under paper where you could NOT just use that FP on another ride.
Weather is almost moot--really depends on severity, ride closure and individual tolerance to conditions.
We did couple of late days at EPCOT--didn't encounter a 90 minute wait at TT. YMMV. But for every SB example, someone may have a different experience.
But for a LATE arrival at EPCOT per your choice to cite that--the chances of having ANY FP for Soarin' are moot.
Present wait times are 60 for Soarin and 45 for TT with a single rider option.
One thing you continue to fail to add as a variable is that you must wait TWO hours to pull a second FP or until the window expires whichever occurs first.
So if you arrive at 10am on a busy day--you cannot pull another pass until noon.
And if you had a lunch or dinner ADR, that is another variable in the "what time will my pass be" game.
While I cannot say one FP is superior to the other for any guest. Neither can you.