How lovely of you to judge who "could have used" a service dog.
Perhaps the blind gentleman is waiting for his dog to be trained. Perhaps he doesn't want one. Perhaps just about anything.
I think it's wonderful that Disney is so good at accommodating people with disabilities that they feel comfortable and safe there.
But you don't need them.
Excellent. Could easily have been a dog that can sense blood sugar changes well before the person thinks to check, or can sense seizures coming on and alert the person to get to a safe place.
Tags aren't needed FYI. So that actually means nothing that the dog had it.
Of course they are. Service animals are considered humans. Just like humans, if they do something egregiously wrong they can get kicked out. But until that time they are a member of the family.
Perhaps there are two people in the family with conditions that require a service dog.
Yep.
The expensive dogs are the seeing eye type of dogs. They have very specific and rigorous training, and are literally born and raised to do it.
Generally if you see a smaller dog that's not what they are doing. They have a natural ability to sense the issues. They weren't born and raised to do this.
I met a couple 2 years ago at home who had three BIG dogs, just pets. Can't recall their breed. The couple's son came home from Iraq with TBI and pre existing type 1 diabetes. He had to move in with his parents bc of the tbi and ptsd
One night two of the dogs came into the couple's room, frantic. The dogs woke them up and herded them into the sons room. He was out of it. They checked his blood sugar. He was dangerously low. The dogs had saved his life. Now they are his service dogs. The third isn't; she doesn't have the ability to sense it. She's still a pet but the other two work with him to keep him alive.
Your words say that you are NOT all for that.
And if they would just ask those questions, as people enter the park, or when they check into the resort, it would cut down on the number of dogs at both places.Service animals are not required to wear a vest, ID tag, or special harness. CMs may ask only two questions, which they will not. (1) is the dog a service animal required because of a disability? and (2) what work or task has the dog been trained to perform? CMs are not allowed to request any documentation for the dog, ask that the dog demonstrate its task, or ask what is the guest's disability.
Well there we go. I know for us it's hard to leave our two dogs home and find someone to take care of them. So I could absolutely see people taking advantage of this. You don't have to pay to put them in a kennel while you're on vacation and get to have them with you. Win win. Not to mention that it might make sense for one service animal but why would people need two with them?
As someone seriously allergic to dogs and cats, this issue is very sensitive for me. I am all for service animals, but I do believe the policy is being abused.
Last time on a plane there was a service dog next to me. I did not question it at all and do believe they can benefit the humans. I asked to be moved to a different section of the plane which was accommodated. Of course, there could have been a service dog in that seat on the previous flight - I never know, so come prepared for medical emergencies. In the parks I am able to avoid them easier which is nice. I think Disney will have to start as other hotels have done - allergy free rooms - for those of us that can not stay in a room that was previously occupied by a service animal as these are becoming more and more common.
My favorite comment I always get when I ask to be moved away from a service dog because of my allergies is "My dog is hypo-allergenic" or "dander-free". They are questioning my allergy, when I never question their disability. Unfortunately I am allergic to the animal's saliva which is airborne and all around the animal. I love dogs, wish I could have one - but at this point in my life I just need to be away from them as much as possible for my health.
For the record, I was making an observation that of ALL the people I saw with dogs the one person that could have really benefited from one didn't even have one. I'm not saying a blind person is the ONLY one who could use one. I know that dogs are of use to invisible illnesses and I even said that in my first post if I'm not mistaken. But with the AMOUNT I've seen this trip I don't believe they all for a good reason. That is just my opinion.
And what if someone is allergic like a PP or deathly afraid of dogs? Whose issue takes priority?
The expensive dogs are the seeing eye type of dogs. They have very specific and rigorous training, and are literally born and raised to do it.
Generally if you see a smaller dog that's not what they are doing. They have a natural ability to sense the issues. They weren't born and raised to do this. .
It always confuses me when someone invites me to pet their service dog as I am explaining to my son why we are not supposed to pet service dogs. That happened at Epcot. This summer at DS, we saw some girls with service dogs in a store trying hats on the dogs and taking pictures in a store. I am an animal lover so I would have no problem wearing a hat a dog had on but some people would be very upset. I researched service animals when I was thinking of getting my dog certified as a therapy dog. (To visit schools, librarys, etc...) I thought the rule was not to approach, pet, or make eye contact with a service animal. This could distract them from their job. There was a video showing a girl falling because her seizure alert dog was distracted by a couple of people that came up to pet it.
I'm wondering, and this is a genuine question, not trying to offend anyone...is there a reason why folks with legitimate service dogs would be against having their dog wear a vest/harness/collar that specifically identifies them as a service dog? I know that service dogs aren't required to wear any ID, but what is the reason behind this?
I work in EMS and I've had a couple instances of people who "needed" to take their dog with them I with them in the ambulance to the ER. The issue is who will take control of the animal when the patient is being treated at the ED? I've been told that I cannot refuse to bring the animal with us unless there is a direct safety hazard, which is not usually the case. It just seems like registering and "licensing" legitimate service animals would cut down on both the abuse of the system and the confusion.
Saw a FB post a couple of weeks back. someone posted a service pony walking through MK.