spaceacewannabe
<font color=red>I've been SO BAD<br><font color=na
- Joined
- Jul 8, 2005
- Messages
- 793
Actually my husband gets 2 weeks a year and is salary. After a few years he'll go up to 3. I'm not aware of many private sector jobs that start with more than two weeks a year.
Edit: I just want to add i don't think teachers are overpaid, if anything they are underpaid. But really arguing that everyone gets the time off they do just doesn't work. Argue how important their job is. Argue that education key to a democracy. Argue that without a well educated populace you lose jobs and your economy suffers. Argue that they are setting the groundwork for future citizens to live independant productive lives. Argue you need to pay them well and respect them to attract the cream of the crop for such an important job. But don't argue that all salaried people get five weeks vacation or that they are the only ones that get tons of off the clock work because it simply isn't true and the other arguments are really more important and persuasive.
I've missed this part of the argument (at least in this thread), but I think there seems to be a misconception that we're being paid for our time off. Yes, as teachers, we have a lot of time off, but it's more like a furlough than a vacation. I can't go to work in June, July, and August. I'm not directing that at anyone here---I know I have family members who still can't be convinced that I'm not earning anything for three months of the year---but I think that's why we as teachers are defensive about the time off. I know I am! In my district, we actually have to PAY for a personal day.
I know that good teachers work very hard, go above and beyond, give of themselves and their resources. Not for one minute do I think it's an easy job. My real frustration in this case is with the union because they really failed the teachers. Not all teachers are compensated equally, but the Central Falls teachers were very well paid. When I was a government employee, I was so grateful for my nice salary and lavish benefit package. I mean it. This was about greed, not about fair compensation. $30/hour for additional work was fair; $90 was not. The administration also said they would seek out grant money to pay for the additional work that was unfunded.
WOW. Is that what they were asking for? Where did you read that? That's insane. We get $14.50 or $18 an hour for curriculum work...the other number is for something else; I don't recall what.
I'd be really ticked at my union.