Lobster Nachos and Gluten Free

[momto2]

Has anyone with a gluten allergy had the lobster nachos? are they ok? I thought I read that they might be cooked in a non-dedicated fryer. They sound so yummy!

 

[sherilaine]

This thread might be very useful. Disney does take GF seriously!

http://www.disboards.com/threads/gluten-free-dining-at-the-disneyland-resort-a-superthread.3003289/

 

[momto2]

I did read the post. It mostly states good places to eat. Not so much on individual items. I am just curious if anyone has had these.

 

[SMD]

You're more likely to get a response by bumping that thread than by making new threads for each GF question as it pops up.

 

[momto2]

Thanks I'll try that.

 

[disneychrista]

Did you read through the pages on the first few pages that list the GF options at each restaurant?

 

[valiamo]

Has anyone with a gluten allergy had the lobster nachos? are they ok? I thought I read that they might be cooked in a non-dedicated fryer. They sound so yummy!

They will warn you that they do not use a dedicated fryer for the chips for the Lobster Nacho's. If you are a serious celiac, then you have to make up your own mind if you want to test the cross contamination. My wife can tolerate a little cross, and was OK with this.

 

[momto2]

They will warn you that they do not use a dedicated fryer for the chips for the Lobster Nacho's. If you are a serious celiac, then you have to make up your own mind if you want to test the cross contamination. My wife can tolerate a little cross, and was OK with this.

Thanks that is what I thought.

Did you read through the pages on the first few pages that list the GF options at each restaurant?

I did but they are from 2013, a little dated considering how many new products have been available in the past few years.

 

[disneychrista]

I did but they are from 2013, a little dated considering how many new products have been available in the past few years.

Yes but in general, if something that was available then was NOT listed on there, I would not expect them to "safe." Of course I would never trust the opposite, meaning just because it is listed as safe then does not mean it is now. But it is a great resource (even 3 years old) as a starting point.