Keith Olbermann

Status
Not open for further replies.
::yes::

More hysteria from a lefty.

Besides, Oby misses the point entirely about "creating" the people that would attack us (if we pull out too soon). Well, they might but then again, often criminals lash out at the people who put them in prison for committing crimes. It's their mentality and comes with the territory. We probably pissed off a lot of Germans for attacking them after they declared war on us (as the terrorists have).Someone on Oby's team should get him some duct tape before his head explodes.


The difference here would be that Iraq did NOT declare war on us.
 
The difference here would be that Iraq did NOT declare war on us.

Actually, that's only the merest glimmer of the beginning of the difference, which is something the "righties" can't seem to grasp. Iraq ain't Germany, and religious extremists aren't German troops. They will never accept us in their society. It will not happen. Period. Not a single expert on the region believes that it will. But who needs "experts" when we've got President Frat Boy, right?

Keith was 100% correct, as he usually is when it comes to calling the right on this kind of thing.
 
::yes::

More hysteria from a lefty.

Besides, Oby misses the point entirely about "creating" the people that would attack us (if we pull out too soon).

Wait, "creating" terrorists IF we pull out too soon? We would have never had terrorism in the first place if we didn't have a long presence in the affairs of the middle east. But of course we need their oil, so we're always there. :sad2:
 
Wait, "creating" terrorists IF we pull out too soon? We would have never had terrorism in the first place if we didn't have a long presence in the affairs of the middle east. But of course we need their oil, so we're always there. :sad2:

Psst....they are gonna tell you to drill in ANWR...too bad that will only help us out for only about 18 months (if we used it exclusvely).
 

I stood up and gave him a standing ovation. I was livid when I read that Bush's contribution to the war effort was to stop playing golf. How incredibly insulting to everyone who has died, lost a loved one or been injured. Thank you Keith Oberman, well done.

Were you just a livid at these comments?

"And there is no reason, Bob, that young American soldiers need to be going into homes of Iraqis in the dead of night, terrorizing kids and children, you know, women, breaking sort of the customs of the-of-the historical customs, religious customs."

"If I read this to you and did not tell you that it was an FBI agent describing what Americans had done to prisoners in their control, you would most certainly believe this must have been done by Nazis, Soviets in their gulags, or some mad regime -- Pol Pot or others -- that had no concern for human beings,"

"Education -- if you make the most of it and you study hard and you do your homework, and you make an effort to be smart, you can do well," said Kerry, a Massachusetts Democrat. "If you don't, you get stuck in Iraq."

"I don't want to sound like an ad, a public service ad on TV, but the fact is if you can read, you can walk into a job later on. If you don't, then you've got the Army, Iraq, I don't know, something like that. It's not as bright,"


I can dig up more if you like...
 
Wait, "creating" terrorists IF we pull out too soon? We would have never had terrorism in the first place if we didn't have a long presence in the affairs of the middle east. But of course we need their oil, so we're always there. :sad2:

Have a "presence" in the affairs of the middle east is justification for horrific acts terrorism???

OKIE DOKIE!!
 
Have a "presence" in the affairs of the middle east is justification for horrific acts terrorism???

He didn't say anything like that. You are smart enough to know that. Are you also smart enough to know that if you have to knowingly distort what other folks are saying to argue your point, it's a good indication that you are wrong?
 
Here's tonight's special comment:


OF WAR & GOLF

Finally tonight, as promised, a Special Comment on two topics a lot of us had foolishly thought, had naively hoped, we would not again have to address… and a third topic nobody thought a President would ever seriously mention in public unless perhaps he'd just been hit in the head with something and was not in full possession of his faculties how he expressed his empathy to the families of the dead in Iraq by giving up golf.


The President has resorted anew to the sleaziest fear-mongering and mass manipulation of an administration of a public life dedicated to realizing the lowest of our expectations.

And he has now applied these poisons to the 2008 presidential election, on behalf of the party at whose center he and Mr. McCain lurk.


Mr. Bush has predicted that the election of a Democratic president could, quote, "eventually lead to another attack on the United States."

This ludicrous, infuriating, holier-than-thou and most importantly bone-headedly wrong statement came yesterday during an interview with Politico.com and online users of Yahoo.


The question was phrased as follows:

"If we were to pull out of Iraq next year, what's the worst that could happen, what's the doomsday scenario?"The President replied:


"Doomsday scenario of course is that extremists throughout the Middle East would be emboldened, which would eventually lead to another attack on the United States.


"The biggest issue we face is, it's bigger than Iraq, it's this ideological struggle against cold-blooded killers who will kill people to achieve their political objectives.'


Mr. Bush, at long last, has it not dawned on you that the America you have now created, includes 'cold-blooded killers who will kill people to achieve their political objectives'?

They are those in, or formerly in, your employ, who may yet be charged some day... with war crimes.

Through your haze of self-congratulation and self-pity, do you still have no earthly clue that this nation has laid waste to Iraq to achieve your political objectives?

'This ideological struggle,' Mr. Bush, is taking place within this country.

It is a struggle between Americans who cherish freedom, ours and everybody else's, and Americans like you, Sir, to whom freedom is just a brand name, just like "Patriot Act" is a brand name or "Protect America" is a brand name.


But wait, there's more.

You also said "Iraq is the place where al Qaeda and other extremists have made their stand and they will be defeated."


They made no "stand" in Iraq, Sir , you allowed them to assemble there!

As certainly as if that were the plan, the borders were left wide open by your government's farcical post-invasion strategy of 'they'll greet us as liberators.'

And as certainly as if that were the plan, the inspiration for another generation of terrorists in another country was provided by your government's farcical post-invasion strategy of letting the societal infra-structure of Iraq dissolve, to be replaced by an American Vice-Royalty enforced by merciless mercenaries who shoot unarmed Iraqis and then evade prosecution in any country, by hiding behind your skirts, Sir.

Terrorism inside Iraq is your creation, Mr. Bush!


It was a Yahoo user who brought up the second topic upon whose introduction Mr. Bush should have passed, or punted, or gotten up and left the room claiming he heard Dick Cheney calling him.

"Do you feel," asked an ordinary American, "that you were misled on Iraq?"


"I feel like -- I felt like, there were weapons of mass destruction. You know, "mislead" is a strong word, it almost connotes some kind of intentional -- I don't think so, I think there was a -- not only our intelligence community, but intelligence communities all across the world shared the same assessment. And so I was disappointed to see how flawed our intelligence was."


Flawed.

You, Mr. Bush, and your tragically know-it-all minions, threw out every piece of intelligence that suggested there were no such weapons.

You, Mr. Bush, threw out every person who suggested that the sober, contradictory, reality-based intelligence needed to be listened to, fast.

You, Mr. Bush, are responsible for how "intelligence communities all across the world shared the same assessment."

You and the sycophants you dredged up and put behind the most important steering wheel in the world propagated palpable nonsense and shoved it down the throat of every intelligence community across the world and punished anybody who didn't agree it was really chicken salad.

And you, Mr. Bush, threw under the bus, all of the subsequent critics who bravely stepped forward later to point out just how much of a self-fulfilling prophecy you had embraced, and adopted as this country's policy in lieu of, say, common sense.

The fiasco of pre-war intelligence, Sir, is your fiasco.

You should build a great statue of yourself turning a deaf ear to the warnings of realists, while you are shown embracing the three-card monte dealers like Richard Perle and Donald Rumsfeld and Dick Cheney.

That would be a far more fitting tribute to your legacy, Mr. Bush, than this Presidential library you are constructing as a giant fable about your presidency an edifice you might as claim was built from Iraqi Weapons of Mass Destruction because there will be just as many of those inside your Presidential library as there were inside Saddam Hussein's Iraq.


Of course if there is one over-riding theme to this president's administration it is the utter, always-failing, inability to know when to quit when it is behind.

And so Mr. Bush answered yet another question about this layered, nuanced, wheels-within-wheels garbage heap that constituted his excuse for war.


"And so you feel that you didn't have all the information you should have or the right spin on that information?"


"No, no," replied the President. "I was told by people, that they had weapons of mass destruction…"


People?

What people?

The insane informant "Curveball?"

The Iraqi snake-oil salesman Ahmed Chalabi?

The American snake-oil salesman Dick Cheney?


"I was told by people that they had weapons of mass destruction, as were members of Congress, who voted for the resolution to get rid of Saddam Hussein.


"And of course, the political heat gets on and they start to run and try to hide from their votes."


Mr. Bush, you destroyed the evidence that contradicted the resolution you jammed down the Congress's throat, the way you jammed it down the nation's throat.

When required by law to verify that your evidence was accurate, you simply re-submitted it, with phrases amounting to "See, I done proved it," virtually written in the margins in crayon.

You defied patriotic Americans to say "The Emperor Has No Clothes" only with the stakes (as you and the mental dwarves in your employ put it) being a "mushroom cloud over an American city."

And as a final crash of self-indulgent nonsense, when the incontrovertible truth of your panoramic and murderous deceit has even begun to cost your political party seemingly perpetual congressional seats in places like North Carolina and, last night, Mississippi, you can actually say with a straight face, Sir, that for members of Congress "the political heat gets on and they start to run and try to hide from their votes" - while you greet the political heat and try to run and hide from your presidency, and your legacy, 4,000 of the Americans you were supposed to protect, dead in Iraq, with your only feeble, pathetic answer being, "I was told by people that they had weapons of mass destruction."


Then came Mr. Bush's final blow to our nation's solar plexus, his last re-opening of our common wounds, his last remark that makes the rest of us question not merely his leadership or his judgment but his very suitably to remain in office.


"Mr. President," he was asked, "you haven't been golfing in recent years. Is that related to Iraq?


"Yes," began perhaps the most startling reply of this nightmarish blight on our lives as Americans on our history.

"It really is. I don't want some mom whose son may have recently died, to see the Commander-in-Chief playing golf. I feel I owe it to the families to be as -- to be in solidarity as best as I can with them. And I think playing golf during a war just sends the wrong signal."


Golf, Sir?

Golf sends the wrong signal to the grieving families of our men and women butchered in Iraq?

Do you think these families, Mr. Bush, their lives blighted forever, care about you playing golf…

Do you think, Sir, they care about you?

You, Mr. Bush, let their sons and daughters be killed.

Sir, to show your solidarity with them you gave up golf?

Sir, to show your solidarity with them you didn't give up your pursuit of this insurance-scam, profiteering, morally and financially bankrupting war.

Sir, to show your solidarity with them you didn't even give up talking about Iraq a subject about which you have incessantly proved without pause or backwards glance, that you may literally be the least informed person in the world?

Sir, to show your solidarity with them, you didn't give up your presidency?

In your own words "solidarity as best as I can" is to stop a game? That is the "best" you can?

4,000 Americans give up their lives and your sacrifice was to give up golf!


Golf.

Not "gulf" -- golf.

And still it gets worse.

Because it proves that the President's unendurable sacrifice, his unbearable pain, the suspension of getting to hit a stick with a ball, was not even his own damned idea.


"Mr. President, was there a particular moment or incident that brought you to that decision, or how did you come to that?"


"I remember when de Mello, who was at the U.N., got killed in Baghdad as a result of these murderers taking this good man's life. And I was playing golf -- I think I was in central Texas -- and they pulled me off the golf course and I said, it's just not worth it any more to do."


Your one, tone-deaf, arrogant, pathetic, embarrassing gesture, and you didn't even think of it yourself?

The great Bushian sacrifice, an Army private loses a leg, a Marine loses half his skull, four thousand of their brothers and sisters lose their lives, you lose golf and they have to pull you off the golf course to get you to just do that?

If it's even true.

Apart from your medical files, which dutifully record your torn calf muscle and the knee pain which forced you to give up running at the same time,coincidence no doubt,the bombing in Baghdad which killed Sergio Vieira de Mello of the UN and interrupted your round of golf, was on August 19th, 2003.

Yet CBS News has records of you playing golf as late as October 13th of that year, nearly two months later.

---

Mr. Bush, I hate to break it to you six-and-a-half years after you yoked this nation and your place in history to the wrong war, in the wrong place, against the wrong people.

But the war in Iraq is not about you.

It is not, Mr. Bush, about your grief when American after American comes home in a box.

It is not, Mr. Bush, about what your addled brain has produced in the way of paranoid delusions of risks that do not exist, ready to be activated if some Democrat, and not your twin Mr. McCain succeeds you.

The war in Iraq, your war, Mr. Bush, is about how you accomplished the derangement of two nations, and how you helped funnel billions of taxpayer dollars to lascivious and perennially thirsty corporations like Halliburton and Blackwater, and how you sent 4,000 Americans to their deaths for nothing.

It is not, Mr. Bush, about your golf game!

And, Sir, if you have any hopes that next January 20th will not be celebrated as a day of soul-wrenching, heart-felt Thanksgiving, because your faithless stewardship of this presidency will have finally come to a merciful end, this last piece of advice:

When somebody asks you, Sir, about Democrats who must now pull this country back from the abyss you have placed us at...

When somebody asks you, Sir, about the cooked books and faked threats you foisted on a sincere and frightened nation…

When somebody asks you, Sir, about your gallant, noble, self-abnegating sacrifice of your golf game so as to soothe the families of the war dead.

This advice, Mr. Bush…

Shut the... hell up!

Good night, and good luck.

Thank You!!!!!!!!!
 
He didn't say anything like that. You are smart enough to know that. Are you also smart enough to know that if you have to knowingly distort what other folks are saying to argue your point, it's a good indication that you are wrong?

Sure he did.

Originally Posted by ChrisFL
Wait, "creating" terrorists IF we pull out too soon? We would have never had terrorism in the first place if we didn't have a long presence in the affairs of the middle east. But of course we need their oil, so we're always there.

What do you think he's saying?

I'd bet the terrorists feel justified in their actions. In fact, I'm sure of it.
 
Have a "presence" in the affairs of the middle east is justification for horrific acts terrorism???

OKIE DOKIE!!

Clearly you're unaware of just how different the mindset is in the middle east. That part of the world has been unstable for a few millenia, it's again farsical that Bush thinks he could somehow change that.

We NEED to be able to sustain ourselves without having to worry about what's going on in these parts of the world. I
 
Clearly you're unaware of just how different the mindset is in the middle east.

Actually, I'm quite aware. I get the correlation between their culture and their methods of dealing with perceived intruders. However, I wouldn't attack a housing complex because I didn't want someone in my country. They shouldn't either. Having a different mindset is no justification for their actions. Understanding their mindset and disagreeing with it are not mutually exclusive.

That part of the world has been unstable for a few millenia, it's again farcical that Bush thinks he could somehow change that.

Then it's farcical for Obama or Clinton (or Carter) to believe they can as well.

We NEED to be able to sustain ourselves without having to worry about what's going on in these parts of the world.

I agree. Except for the fact that some of them have nuclear weapons. They are incredibly more dangerous to the rest of the world than they were just 50 years ago.
 
What do you think he's saying?
Oh please. He's saying exactly what he said - that a presence lead to terrorism. You are smart enough to know that saying A caused B isn't at all saying that B is justified because of A. Cause and justification are very different things. You know that. If you feel your point is valid, why the need to make untrue statements about what other people are saying?
 
Perhaps Winnie the Pooh is a good example...

He can stick his hand in a bees nest to try to get to the honey, but he most likely would get stung relentlessly by angry bees.

Now he can sit there and keep his hand in the bees nest trying to figure out the reasons why the bees want him out of there (Despite the fact that is how bees have reacted for thousands of years), when he only wants some of their honey, OR he can take his hand out and realize there are other, safer places he could find honey instead.
 
Oh please. He's saying exactly what he said - that a presence lead to terrorism. You are smart enough to know that saying A caused B isn't at all saying that B is justified because of A. Cause and justification are very different things. You know that. If you feel your point is valid, why the need to make untrue statements about what other people are saying?


Because that's all he knows how to do.
 
Perhaps Winnie the Pooh is a good example...

He can stick his hand in a bees nest to try to get to the honey, but he most likely would get stung relentlessly by angry bees.

Now he can sit there and keep his hand in the bees nest trying to figure out the reasons why the bees want him out of there (Despite the fact that is how bees have reacted for thousands of years), when he only wants some of their honey, OR he can take his hand out and realize there are other, safer places he could find honey instead.

Chris. Congratulations. What a great analogy. I don't think I've seen Winnie the Pooh put into such a context with the Middle East before, but for the Dis board, it is perfect. Well Done. :thumbsup2 :thumbsup2
 
Oh please. He's saying exactly what he said - that a presence lead to terrorism. You are smart enough to know that saying A caused B isn't at all saying that B is justified because of A. Cause and justification are very different things. You know that. If you feel your point is valid, why the need to make untrue statements about what other people are saying?

If he doesn't feel that B is justified by A, then *he* should speak up. I did pose it as a question. Sadly, there are many people who feel that we got what we deserved because of A. I certainly don't. They feel the response (terrorism) *IS* justified. Terrorism by one name. "Freedom Fighter" by another.
 
Perhaps Winnie the Pooh is a good example...

He can stick his hand in a bees nest to try to get to the honey, but he most likely would get stung relentlessly by angry bees.

Now he can sit there and keep his hand in the bees nest trying to figure out the reasons why the bees want him out of there (Despite the fact that is how bees have reacted for thousands of years), when he only wants some of their honey, OR he can take his hand out and realize there are other, safer places he could find honey instead.

Of course you're "smart enough" to know that bees are instinctual creatures and have no cognizant reasoning skills. Humans, however, do have that capacity. Sadly, some don't use them.

But it's refreshing to know you put bees and people in the middle east on the same level.
 
I did pose it as a question.
You aslo claimed he said it. Your exact words were "Sure he did." He didn't. You are smart enough to know he didn't. If you so sure in your beliefs, why the need to claim other people are saying things they didn't.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

New Posts


Disney Vacation Planning. Free. Done for You.
Our Authorized Disney Vacation Planners are here to provide personalized, expert advice, answer every question, and uncover the best discounts. Let Dreams Unlimited Travel take care of all the details, so you can sit back, relax, and enjoy a stress-free vacation.
Start Your Disney Vacation
Disney EarMarked Producer






DIS Facebook DIS youtube DIS Instagram DIS Pinterest DIS Tiktok DIS Twitter

Add as a preferred source on Google

Back
Top Bottom