We have tried Universal twice through the years, once probably in the late 80s or early 90s and again probably in the 2005 to 2010 time frame. Both trips were for a day or two on the front end of a Disney trip. We were o.k. with it but that was long before they had their own resorts and obviously before Harry Potter. We didn't feel like it was worth it for us. I've read a lot about the new rides and how much less the resorts are from Disney so I have a few questions.
If someone can not ride roller coasters or 3D rides would they still enjoy it? My son (adult) has nerve damage in his spinal cord so can't ride any roller coasters. For example: he can't ride EE at AK, can ride BTM but only once a trip and it has to be at the end of the day so he can go back to the resort and hot tub. Can't ride Space Mountain, even SDMT sometimes hurts. He and I both get motion sick on some of the 3D rides. For example: neither of us can ride Star Tours, for him it's a combination of the 3D and claustrophobia. He can ride FoP but I'm not a fan, it makes me a little sick. Neither of us can ride Mission to Mars, again the simulator for both of us and the claustrophobia for him. He now has a 1 year old baby as well. There are a lot of rides at WDW she can ride, basically mostly anything that she can be held in a lap on like Figment, Mexico, LWTL and the Seas at Epcot, Pirates, HM, PP, Small World, WTP, CoP, PeopleMover at MK, MMRR at HS, Safari and Navi at AK.
Given those issues, would there be enough rides to do at Universal?