Bren's Mom
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Aug 11, 2006
- Messages
- 4,191
for the time being, the state controller is refusing to comply with the govenator's decision (did the same thing a couple of years ago).
the controller's office contends that it's illegal for the state to take this action, they don't want to get hit with the liability that could occur, AND their payroll system can't make a change like this.
That controller is smart. I'm guessing that many of the state workers are unionized, with a contract? And if that's the case, he is absolutely correct that what the Governor is proposing is illegal. It would never hold up in arbitration, and would end up costing the state SO much more.
). if they are one of the state employees that are already getting a wage cut due to mandatory furloughs i can't imagine what would happen if their "new" wages were insufficient to cover their insurance.