Then isn’t the reverse true? Aren’t those resorts then being graded at an advantage not because of how great they are individually but because of how great the cash side hotel is? What amenities are specific to the DVC side of those resorts that add value? The resorts you’ve pointed out aren’t being fully graded based on their own merit either, except for Aulani which is another thing all together and was built with both components in mind at the start. Again, the only other exception that comes to mind is Kidani.
For many of the DVC resorts, the appeal and functionality is greatly, if not solely, placed on their attachment to their respective hotels. And that’s obviously not a bad thing, we all love those resorts because of the amenities from the cash-side but we can’t talk about Riviera getting graded on a curve and not acknowledge that all the other resorts are all being given 20 extra credit points for simply building some rooms that sit next to all the hotel side amenities. This is why I thought the Poly Tower would have been better suited as its own association because it would have forced DVD to make sure it stood on its own with its dining and leisure capacity’s instead of relying on the hotel. Tbf, that’s still to be determined, hopefully I’m wrong.
Anyway, this is where I bow out of trying to convince RIV skeptics to see it the way I do (for now

), maybe one day I’ll get yall! I mean no offense to those who disagree it’s mostly just fun banter.