lockedoutlogic
DIS Legend
- Joined
- Apr 26, 2007
- Messages
- 15,781
Toy Story Land = Dinoland part deux
Even worse...it's Chester and Hester part 2...from the Early indications
Toy Story Land = Dinoland part deux
Unfortunately yes...Toy Story Land = Dinoland part deux
I think they are trying everything to not cut anything from SWL which is why you are seeing everything cut from toy story.Very skeptical about what they're willing to invest in the Star Wars land..
I think they are trying everything to not cut anything from SWL which is why you are seeing everything cut from toy story.
Florida statutes limit the maximum rate that you can charge for lodging and it is required to displayed in the hotel. The idea is to prevent price gouging ...a very important thing to consider in a place with so much tropical activity...
In 2001...after the dates you stated...the Maximum rate by law for a standard room at a moderate (they are all standard) was $225 per night...
...
Keep digging...
Florida law allows hotels to change whatever they'd like, as long as the rate is filed with the state & posted in the room five days in advance. In other words, Disney was legally allowed to price gouge during the Holiday period surrounding the Millennium but when it dropped plans several months (at least, the exact time frame I can't recall), it was under no obligation to file the rates with the state or post them within the room.
Try again! At least it's (somewhat) factual.
But they don't...and they never have...because Disney doesn't update those posting in real time and never has in the manner that you are speaking. Are you telling me they restickered 13,000 (at the time...roughly) rooms and then did it again on January 2nd? Do You know what that costs in labor alone?...do you know how difficult the old dpms system was to resolve accounting changes? There were few rate changes then specifically because of that.
do you know that rates where grandfathered at that time? Which means it would have affected no one.
...
I'll do the research...there has to be Stories of bonafide presells beyond the range of strategic planning (3-5 years at most in WDW) and then the bait and switch...it's out there on the internet somewhere.
Here, I'll help:
http://articles.sun-sentinel.com/19...90_1_crowne-plaza-new-year-s-eve-times-square
Here's an article written in February, 1996:
"For instance, thinking about ringing in 2000 at Walt Disney World? Think again. You might get into one of the theme parks, but there isn't a single room available for Dec. 31, 1999, in any of the Disney Resort Hotels. That's more than 30,000 rooms. Even the Boardwalk resort hotel is booked for that night - and the Boardwalk isn't even finished yet... To reserve a room at a Disney hotel takes actual money, not a name on a list or even a credit-card guarantee."
You think Disney reserved all 30K rooms in a few months or something? (I could probably find more information, but I'm not going to waste any more time on it). We booked our room for 12/31/99 (like I said, we later changed it) at the Dixie Landings in December 1991 -- when the DL wasn't even finished. I can recall the promotions 'where will you be on 12/31/99' that existed in WDW in the 1990s.
Keep trying.
I read a similar article from 12/26/95 in the New York Times that said "limited availability" for 1999...
And they did not have 30,000 WDW Rooms in 1999...certainly not in 1996...I don't know where that number is coming from...
But here's what I need to see to validate you...I need one person in the millions on this board - including the majority of Disney fanatics...to tell me they paid a 300-400% upcharge on that one night...that's all.
Of course the rooms we're booked...they are every year...it is the busiest week of the year and you pay a 50% markup for those days...
Just want to know how this never once came up...like how could that not have been a known thing in the resort operations units around that time?
Yeah, the article was wrong. I got it.
Articles can be wrong. For example a couple weeks ago the Orlando business journal wrote and article that Disney field permits to build a new dining building at ft. Wilderness. Those permits were filed in 2011 and never used. The article was wrong and days later taken down because it was.Yeah, the article was wrong in every way. I got it.
Articles can be wrong. For example a couple weeks ago the Orlando business journal wrote and article that Disney field permits to build a new dining building at ft. Wilderness. Those permits were filed in 2011 and never used. The article was wrong and days later taken down because it was.
If you two continue to be argumentative towards each other I take action. Let's play nice please.
No...i added up the total rooms for the WDW hotels online and it was about 18,000 plus ft wilderness. Math is easy...so that number includes something else
Articles can be wrong.
http://articles.orlandosentinel.com...176_1_new-year-eve-disney-hotel-eve-package/2
Here's an Orlando Sentinel article mentioning that WDW's room inventory had been sold out since 1995, and mentions a guest who booked her room in 1992.
I'm talking about the 30,000 number.
https://touringplans.com/walt-disney-world/hotels/number-rooms
WDW has just over 30,000 onsite rooms now. No way they had that in the 90s. There are more hotels on WDW property today than there were in the 90s.
I just want to see proof of the $500 rates at Port Orleans. The hotels are booked almost every New Years so that's really not even questionable but that $500 deal really gets me.
I have to go back and disagree again. I work with hundreds of high school seniors every year and talk with each one for a period of time sometimes more than an hour. I can't remember the last time one of them brought up Harry Potter or had anything Harry Potter