Yeah..I'm not debating that but that's not what I'm talking about. I feel like that's the type of deflecting people like to do no offense. Like ignore what I'm saying because well you can get it anywhere (yeah..but that's not what's being talked about).
I'm saying travel especially airplane travel and international travel most especially aren't just being thought of when it comes to after effects in regards to mortality rate. You said "I would totally get on a plane and take a vacation". It's not that simple for everyone even as I said our present plans is to still go to Vegas which will be on a plane. For right now it appears most companies are concentrating, probably rightfully so, on international travel. That may not always be the case as time goes on here in the U.S.
We don't have a choice on what my husband's work does. If they deem our leisure travel enough of a risk with international travel (with exceptions to Canada and Mexico) we could be told to self-isolate despite no symptoms AND we're not high risk. That's a huge thing. Maybe not to you though

.
A large local company had 2 employees come from an international flight, they were sent home to self-isolate, no symptoms present but the company felt they may have been exposed on the flight, everyone had to leave, the entire building and items within it was cleaned and people were able to come back to work the next day. The companies don't want to take too much risks and in all honesty I don't blame them..part overreaction of course but as this thread is related to travel I get it. Domestic travel doesn't seem to be as much of the focus at this point but not all companies are excluding domestic travel in their travel restrictions/monitoring.