RobDoc
DIS Legend
- Joined
- Aug 14, 1998
- Messages
- 34,195
I agree 100%. Hawaii is a beach destination, if they want it to sell, unlike HH, it needs to be on the beach and a good one at that.
Hawai is the one place I'd actually addd points if it is done right.
HH is NOT (and has never claimed to be) a "beach destination". It is located on it's own private island and does have access to a beach , but it has never been promoted as a "beach destination". I don't understand why some can't accept a resort for it's own merits and insist on downgrading resorts based on their personal bias.
Are you then suggesting that VB (which is promoted as a "beach destination") was a good seller? VB began sales before HH and didn't end sales until after HH - in spite of being a "beach destination". If going to a "beach destination" is critical to one's vacation enjoyment, by all means avoid HH (and Colorado and New York and Arizona and ...) although HH does have access to a truly wonderful, wide, gradual beach very nearby. To each his own.
Perhaps being a "beach destination" isn't the only magic ingredient to guarantee fast sell out.
Hopefully DVC will invite your advice and approval should they consider a Hawaii location - it would be a shame to go thru all of that planning and construction and still not have it "done right".