Interesting article on Coastal Building

  • Thread starter Thread starter WebmasterAlex
  • Start date Start date
W

WebmasterAlex

Guest
Here is a link to the entire article

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/9234051/

but the part I found most interesting was here:
In 1998, Deputy Assistant Army Secretary Michael L. Davis tried to stop the Army Corps of Engineers from rubber-stamping casino applications without studying the impact dredging would have on marshes that shelter wildlife, purify drinking water and help prevent flooding. This angered Lott, then Senate majority leader, who had recently flown to Las Vegas in a casino executive's jet and had raised $100,000 for Republicans at a casino-industry fundraiser.

Lott got the moratorium lifted, then he got the Army to launch an investigation of Davis. No wrongdoing was found, but Davis was removed from Gulf Coast permitting issues.

Other federal decisions have spurred coastal development. By law, barrier-island homeowners are not eligible for federal flood insurance. Ecologically, these islands act as a mutable and natural buffers against hurricane surges. But when Hurricane Fran hit North Carolina in 1996, the federal government forked over money to rebuild barrier-island roads and bridges -- and set off a development gold rush.

"They used to require 600-foot-deep lots on these islands -- now developers are selling postage-stamp lots," said Pilkey, the Duke professor.

The federal government also paid prodigious sums in flood insurance claims to property owners who had insisted on building in harm's way. In 1998, David Conrad of the National Wildlife Federation identified 32,000 properties in which the owners already had cashed in at least two federal flood insurance claims. The federal flood insurance fund now shows a negative balance -- and it has not begun to address the coming surge of Katrina claims.

"There's been a steadily increasing buildup in high-hazard areas, especially in the Gulf from Louisiana to Alabama," Conrad said. " The federal and local governments don't have the ability to say no, even when the risks are so obvious."
On the coastal roadway in Biloxi, a massive red crane -- in place to repair work from the last hurricane -- sprawls across the road. Elegant Victorian homes are hollowed shells; discount motels seemed to have just exploded. The gray branches of cypress trees are clotted with mattresses and sheets and little girls' dolls. Up the road, a 30-foot storm surge had hurled a huge casino ship across the coastal road and into the flank of an old apartment building. The casino lies on its side, like a beached whale.

"The most impressive picture to me was the casino that . . . squished on top of a Holiday Inn," said retired Brig. Gen. Gerald Galloway, formerly of the Army Corps and author of a report on flood-plain management. "I hope this makes people in the risk zones realize what they're up against."

Fortified Japanese cities
None of this is inevitable. In Japan, the government has spent billions of dollars fortifying cities against super-typhoons. After the Mississippi River floods of 1993, federal and state officials made the wrenching decision to buy out more than 13,000 flood-prone homes and businesses.

High waters in those areas now cause very little damage. In 1993, Charles County, Mo., suffered $26 million in damage; after a big buyout, a similar flood two years later cost $300,000. The entire town of Valmeyer, Ill., moved to higher ground.

Might this offer a solution for low-lying sections of New Orleans? House Speaker L. Dennis Hastert (R-Ill.) was castigated last week for even suggesting such a thing.

"I'm not sure it's tenable in this country to abandon a city of that size, but New Orleans should not even exist and hundreds of people are dying to prove that point," said David M. Bush, a professor of geology at West Georgia University. "To build it somewhere else would cost trillions of dollars -- but not to make a move risks an even greater disaster."

Scientists suggest that Gulf Coast officials should ban new building on barrier islands, require setbacks for all coastal development, and perhaps refuse to reconstruct a bridge or two. But they doubt that will happen.

"It's almost unpatriotic to say we can't stop nature," Pilkey said.

While American flags hang from the broken bones of homes, and thousands of residents wait for flood insurance checks in Biloxi and Gulfport, three gleaming, 20-story condominium projects -- the Vue Crescent, the Caribbean Dream and the Shores of Paradise -- remain slated for construction. The determination in the voice of Biloxi Police Officer John Campbell, 50 and bald and muscular, is heard everywhere.

"I'm going to rebuild my house on stilts this time," Johnson said. "You can't let Mother Nature beat you."

That determination was seconded by President Bush when he visited the Gulf Coast last week.

"The good news is -- and it's hard for some to see it now -- that out of this chaos is going to come a fantastic Gulf Coast, like it was before," Bush said. "Out of the rubble of Trent Lott's house -- he's lost his entire house -- there's going to be a fantastic house. And I'm looking forward to sitting on the porch."
 
Okay without bashing anyone, it's time for me to climb up on my soapbox. I have lived on the Texas Gulf Coast for all but 1 of my 46 years on this earth. I live and breath for fishing, hunting and stomping around the marsh, the bay and the beaches. It's in my blood. Now from a purely no scientific view and based pretty much on my personal experience and observations over the years I can tell you that as a society we make some pretty stupid decsions when it comes to where to build what. I spent a lot of time as a kid going to Bolivar Pennisula to fish on a pier there. The house built over the water where you paid and got bait was on the beach when I first starting going there. By the last time I fished on that version of the pier (before a storm blew it away) the house was about 250 yards away from the beach. The time span was about five years. 250 yards of erosion in five years. Was that normal? Well yeah thats the way nature works. Bolivar Pennisula is part of the chain of barrier islands and pennisulas that nature has created throughout the history of the world. They come, they go. To build permanent structures in this area and be surprised when they get washed away is just plain stupid. The Gulf of Mexico from the panhandle of Florida to the southern tip of Texas is a very shallow body of water by the worlds standards. The water appears brown and dirty a lot of the time. The reason is that so many rivers feed the gulf and bring silt into the Gulf. In my area of Texas alone starting at the Louisiana border we have the Sabine, Trinity, Old, Lost, San Jacinto, Brazos, San Bernard and Colorado rivers along with and untold number of Bayous and creeks feeding into the Gulf. They bring soil and sand that then forms the areas along the coast. The produce the most unstable building platform known to man. Additionally when man redirects, damns, cuts off or otherwise disrupts the flow of the water they do irrepreble damage. I have seen entire fisheries die, wetlands and marshlands die, just because some buch of people built a bunch of houses in an area where no house should have ever been built. The rivers provide nutrients to these marshes and when they are cut of by a Corp of Engineers project, the marsh dies and so does a little piece of me. We as a society feel that no place is sacred and there is no place that if an individual has enough money we cannot build. HORSE HOCKEY! Some places were meant to be enjoyed as a visitor where you only visist and do not build. Enjoy its beauty and then loeave! Leave no structures, no garbage, no sign that you were ever there so that my children and my childrens children along with many generations to come can enjoy it to. Continue on our present course and I can promise you one thing. Mother Nature will continue to send her cleaning crews (ie hurricanes) in an attempt to convince mankind that there are certain places you should just never build permanent structures.
 
I'll join you on your soapbox. Let Mother Nature do her thing - she's going to win anyway, no matter what we do. Allowing people to continue to build in these areas is ridiculous, but if people will pay, the communities will cave. We have a condo/hotel on the coast in NC that was teetering on the edge - they were told when it was built that the location was bad and would erode, but built anyway, then when the beachfront began to disappear the property owners pitched a fit and begged for beach refurbishment. NC law prohibited it, but they fought until they got the rules changed, and the inlet was "relocated." Even though I've stayed in the hotel and like it, I would have been perfectly happy to see it fall into the ocean!

And as for Trent Lott's house... I'll refrain from comment in the spirit of being nice!
 
If individuals want to shoulder the risk, I have no problem with rebuilding. But the federal government shouldn't be bailing out these high risk properties.
 



Disney Vacation Planning. Free. Done for You.
Our Authorized Disney Vacation Planners are here to provide personalized, expert advice, answer every question, and uncover the best discounts. Let Dreams Unlimited Travel take care of all the details, so you can sit back, relax, and enjoy a stress-free vacation.
Start Your Disney Vacation
Disney EarMarked Producer

New Posts







DIS Facebook DIS youtube DIS Instagram DIS Pinterest DIS Tiktok DIS Twitter

Add as a preferred source on Google

Back
Top Bottom