BMNABrinx said:
I knew her wishes as did her children. She absolutely did not want to be put on any machines.
Her oncologist asked us at that time if grandma had a DNR. We had to say "yes" because it was her wish. Grandma was moved to CCU and was slowly improving until they put a purple bracelet on her left wrist. She asked what it was for and they told her it was "to let them know that if her heart stopped they weren't to restart it." That is when she took a turn for the worst and decided that she was going to die. She told me that evening that they said "my heart isn't strong enough to make it. I'm not gonna make it." The nurse told me she was very upset when he put the bracelet on her and explained it to her. He said if they had put it on her in the ER like they were supposed to instead of waiting 3 days that she wouldn't have even known it was there.
I do believe in upholding a loved ones wishes but I also think things need to be handled very delicately on the medical end in a case such as this. We did our part but what would have happened before the bracelet?
I'm sorry about your Grandma. It sounds from your post that your grandma had a desire not to be resusciated but that there were no actual legal directives made before she went into the hospital? (Which would explain why no bracelet could be applied in the ER).
What
has to happen is that her attending physician has to have a discussion with her to explain her condition and review her wishes before actually ordering DNR/DNI. If she was awake and alert this would have occurred with her, and perhaps the family also, but ultimately if she is able to, then she will be the one to make the decision. She may not have understood exactly what this meant - there's so much going on it can get confusing - but if I were her nurse under these circumstances in putting the bracelet on I would have explained to her what it meant, including the fact that it didn't mean that we were not going to treat her or that we were giving up hope, just that if the worst happened we would let her go peacefully and not put her through the pain of resuscitation; and I would also call back the attending physician to have him or her review it again and offer assurances about it as well.
What most people don't realize is that the agency that accredits hospitals mandates that "code status" be addressed with every patient who comes to the hospital. Those that don't comply risk losing accreditation. So every patient who comes in is asked their desires, and we even have to offer them the paperwork to fill out directives if they don't already have them in place. However, with that said, for most people coming in to the hospital, it's not exactly an urgent issue unless someone is critically or terminally ill, when it becomes a little more pressing to know exactly what the patient desires.
Full resuscitation is not pretty. If someone is expected to die, it's a kindness to let them go without the suffering what a "code" entails (electric shocks with defibrillation, broken ribs with chest compressions, tubes down throats for ventilation, urinary catheters placed, big needles placed in the neck while bed tilted upside down for a central line, buck naked with a room full of people, etc). Obviously, this would be different for those who aren't expected to die and/or have a chance for full recovery.