Sandcass said:Obi-Wan , Have you & your DW looked into adoption? I'm sorry to be so nosey, but I'm curious, because my good friend just adopted 2 babies in a row and she has MANY medical problems. I was surprised she was able to get them. The first was an open adoption where the birth mother chose her. The 2nd is a child that was abandoned, and was a ward of the state.
pearlieq said:0-2. I still want to be able to live my life!
Plus I think sticking to two is responsible--DH and I would only be replacing ourselves and not actively contributing to population growth.
Rafiki Rafiki Rafiki said:I went out with a friend today and her 4 kids under the age of 9. To me, that was too many...at least for me.
Mine are almost 5, 7, and 16. If the oldest was closer in age to the other two, I would be a crazy woman.
By the way, if each couple only gave birth to two kids, the population would die out. I think scientists calculate that "zero-population-growth" number somewhere between 2.4 and 3.
Obi-Wan Pinobi said:We never officially looked into it. When we were throwing the idea around we were told by several friends and acquaintences that we would never get approved with Lauri in the condition she is in. It's not like she is going to die in the next year or two, although it could happen, but there are times, like last night, where she can't even walk. If you think it is possible though, maybe we can go ahead and officially look into it. Just out of curiosity, how much does the average adoption run? I know the overseas ones can be quite a bit of money.
aprilgail2 said:2...any more than that I don't think they would each get the attention growing up they would deserve....
Money was not an object. We had one. That's all we wanted and all we agreed to have. We could afford more, but didn't want more. So the answer to your question is ONE.Papa Deuce said:Assume that money was plentiful. You could be a SAHM. How many kids would you like to have had, or would you have?