miztressuz
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Feb 23, 2011
- Messages
- 6,916
I have a decision to make.... I can either use all UR's for a week car rental in Maui- UR cash cost is 309.40 or 20,626 Ur's....
Or costco travel has a car for $247- Using the 'divide by .015' method I calculate the first cost oop as $0, but if I choose the 2nd, I'd pay the $247 oop, but $247/.015= 164.47- does this mean I'm really only saving the $164 when debating which is a better choice?
..........ETA......... So I just check my portal (hello expedia,1st time looking since the change) and I found a booking for a minivan on my dates costing 225.99 -so 15066 UR..... that's a great deal! I still am unsure about the CSR in my name and the driver being my DH (help advise please) and I had it bill the last .99 to my CSR...will that provide coverage?
??? No experts here on this? Trying to pin down actual money saved if using ur's vs cash...
Using the first scenario, in terms of using UR to pay for each rental, I'd calculate out how much UR each would cost me.
Chase Travel, 20626 UR (309.40 / .015)
Costco Travel, 24,700 UR (247 / .01, cash reimbursement rate)
So despite having a higher overall cash cost, the cost in UR for the Chase portal rental is lower and saved you 4,074 UR; the value of which is subjective (I baseline it at the 1 cpp minimum).
In terms of calculating a cash savings value, I'd use either 309.40 or 247, whichever you'd have picked outside of having UR in the equation. That's literally what you saved in cash by using UR.
In terms of calculating the cash benefit of a CSR (whether it's worthwhile to keep or not) then I'd look at the difference in UR's. In that case having the CSR saved 4074 UR, which I'd use the cash valuation of $40.74. If I would have booked through the Chase portal anyway at the 309.40 rate (perhaps this was the cheapest rate for your desired rental), then I'd have saved 10314 UR by having the CSR, at a cash valuation of $103.14.