as a mammo tech, maybe i can be of assistance. As for the debate between digital and film-screen
1. studies have only shown that digital is only "as good" as film-screen, not better.
2. digital equipment is around $400,000 per machine as opposed to around $80,000 for the other. Dont expect wide use of digital until the price comes down or studies show that it IS better and the public demands it.
As to debbieb's problem with scheduling a diagnostic.
Most insurances will not pay for a diagnostic unless a patient has a CURRENT problem. At our facility, we have been told that if the patient doesnt have a problem and we bill for a diagnostic, that is commiting insurance fraud. a big no-no.
Part of problem is that several years ago, it was commonplace to give out results while the patient was at the facility. Then the insurance companies got involved and started setting down requirement for the more expensive (usually triple) charge. Women got use to getting results right away, and now dont understand the changes. Lots of women come into our place with diagnostic slip(some thinking they have figured out a way to get around the system) but if they dont have a problem, we HAVE to screen them . I agree that it is nerveracking waiting for results, but just like everying in medicine(including lab work, Paps, etc. ) it takes a few days to get results. And yes, it is inconvenient to have to come back for extra views.
hope this was of help