Personally, I think that no school should have the right to tell a parent what their kid can and can not eat with their lunch.
Originally posted by kylara
The schools may use the subsidy as an excuse but that only covers what the school SERVES not what is brought from home. I think that the school might be using it as an excuse so those students receiving the subsidy don't feel that they are missing out.
Originally posted by gepetto
That's not true. The government will tell the school what is not to be allowed into the cafeteria....(ie soda, fast food or whatever they decide). It includes what kids bring from home. If the school does not comply they can lose their funding.
State law mandates that food or drink purchased at fast food establishments may not be brought into the school area where students receive meals before or during the breakfast or lunch service periods. Canned or bottled carbonated beverages may not be brought from home into the cafeteria during the breakfast or lunch service periods.
This is not accurate.That's not true. The government will tell the school what is not to be allowed into the cafeteria....(ie soda, fast food or whatever they decide). It includes what kids bring from home. If the school does not comply they can lose their funding.
It looks like the "no beverages from home" part is not part of the state law, but a school district policy (which, again would probably be struck down if challenged).State law mandates that food or drink purchased at fast food establishments may not be brought into the school area where students receive meals before or during the breakfast or lunch service periods. Canned or bottled carbonated beverages may not be brought from home into the cafeteria during the breakfast or lunch service periods. We ask for your total cooperation in following this policy to avoid any uncomfortable situations for all of us.
The federal government provides subsidies for school cafeterias. If they are "in danger of losing their subsidy" it would be due to a violation of federal law.I didn't say it was the FEDERAL government that prohibited fast food from school.
IMO, the government does not have the authority to tell parents what their children may or may not have for lunch. Courts usually side with parents unless the safety or well-being of the child is at stake. For example, many overly restrictive school dress codes have been struck down by the courts because parents have challenged them. There's just no compelling reason for a school to deny a child a soda at lunch, and I believe the courts would agree. JMO...As for the TN law, how do you know it would "probably be struck down"? Why is that?