I see your point and clearly there are a lot of ways to look at the pricing of points. One thing to consider, however, is that if you buy a contract with previous year's points, you can rent out those points for an average of $10 each. Usually in these cases the mf for past years are not reimbursed whereas current year mf usually are. So (assuming a BWV contract) the 2011 points have an average value of $10 each and the 2012 points have an average value of about $4.38 [$10 rental - $5.62 mf]. That's not using the pricing metric that is used to calculate long term cost of points, it's simply taking into consideration their cash value.
So by that logic, it would stand to reason that if a sample contract at BWV that had 100 2011 points and 100 2012 points were priced at $60 pp, you could rent out all of those points and have a net cost of $45.62 [$60 out of pocket cost + 2012 mf - $20 in rental income from 2011 and 2012 points].
By that logic, a comparable stripped contract (no 2011 or 2012 points) should be priced at $45.62 (assuming mf for 2012 are not reimbursed). From what I've seen, stripped contract listings do not adhere to this logic and are, therefore, a lesser value than buying a loaded contract.
This is the exact same logic I use when looking for a contract. I always value loaded and banked points at $10/point. I only buy loaded contracts. Stripped contracts are nearly always over priced. This of course assumes you don't mind renting out those extra points.