Poohforyou
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Mar 16, 2011
- Messages
- 5,582
I would be livid and not only would everything be free, but they would be replacing the ten year-old baby oak with another ten year-old baby oak.
Exactly
I would be livid and not only would everything be free, but they would be replacing the ten year-old baby oak with another ten year-old baby oak.
I would expect them to replace the oak tree, but I wouldn't expect them to finish the other work for free. If they fix their error I'd be satisfied. You'll be back in the position you originally were in finding someone to get rid of those dead trees and you can go with the company you wanted to use.
I would expect them to replace the oak tree, but I wouldn't expect them to finish the other work for free. If they fix their error I'd be satisfied. You'll be back in the position you originally were in finding someone to get rid of those dead trees and you can go with the company you wanted to use.



Hi guys.....sorry it's been awhile for an update.
DH called near noon. (I listened in on another phone but didn't dare say anything)
OMG....the guy said he knew he was in the wrong for coming onto our property without our permission but quickly said he thought he was doing us a favor by showing up a week early to get the job done!
He said a bunch of other stuff but probably the best one was he told my DH he thought his wife (me) was worried about the Grandfather Oak (a 170 yr old tree about 50 feet from the cedar-baby oak), not the baby. Yeah right! DH is a quiet guy and didn't fight this, even tho DH and this guy were totally discussing the baby oak the day of the estimate and how they could take the Cedar down without harming it.
And finally.......DH was adamant about the guy replacing the baby oak and the guy said no problem but he would add at least $300 to our bill and NOT take off the price of removing the cedar/baby oak like he said yesterday!! So when (if we decide for them to come out and finish the entire job) it would cost us not $600 for these trees to come down but near $1,000.
I told DH we would just go with another tree removal for the other 3 dead pines and call it good.
It's just so frustrating esp when this guy and his company, I feel, are SO in the wrong!!
Uncle Remus......thanks for that link!!!![]()
Hi guys.....sorry it's been awhile for an update.
DH called near noon. (I listened in on another phone but didn't dare say anything)
OMG....the guy said he knew he was in the wrong for coming onto our property without our permission but quickly said he thought he was doing us a favor by showing up a week early to get the job done!
He said a bunch of other stuff but probably the best one was he told my DH he thought his wife (me) was worried about the Grandfather Oak (a 170 yr old tree about 50 feet from the cedar-baby oak), not the baby. Yeah right! DH is a quiet guy and didn't fight this, even tho DH and this guy were totally discussing the baby oak the day of the estimate and how they could take the Cedar down without harming it.
And finally.......DH was adamant about the guy replacing the baby oak and the guy said no problem but he would add at least $300 to our bill and NOT take off the price of removing the cedar/baby oak like he said yesterday!! So when (if we decide for them to come out and finish the entire job) it would cost us not $600 for these trees to come down but near $1,000.
I told DH we would just go with another tree removal for the other 3 dead pines and call it good.
It's just so frustrating esp when this guy and his company, I feel, are SO in the wrong!!
Uncle Remus......thanks for that link!!!![]()

I think your next step would be to send a certified letter to the tree company stating that they came onto your property and did work without permission,that they took down a tree that you expressly stated you did not want taken down during your conversation about the estimate, and that you want them to replace the tree they mistakenly took down.
If you get no response, then I would take them to small claims court.
I had some neighbors in back of me that deliberately cut down several tall, thin trees in a wooded area of my backyard.
I sent them a letter, and received a response, but they refused to pay for the damage.
So I filed a claim in small claims court. Surprise, when I arrived at court they were there with a representative from their homeowner's insurance company, and they ( their insurance company) paid me the amount I was asking for right then and there.
I wouldn't be surprised if the company's insurance would cover this.
I would not drop this!
Good luck!
OH, be sure to take photos of the tree they cut down, also if you have any photos of the tree before they cut it down , I would put those aside as well.
I think your next step would be to send a certified letter to the tree company stating that they came onto your property and did work without permission,that they took down a tree that you expressly stated you did not want taken down during your conversation about the estimate, and that you want them to replace the tree they mistakenly took down.
If you get no response, then I would take them to small claims court.
I had some neighbors in back of me that deliberately cut down several tall, thin trees in a wooded area of my backyard.
I sent them a letter, and received a response, but they refused to pay for the damage.
So I filed a claim in small claims court. Surprise, when I arrived at court they were there with a representative from their homeowner's insurance company, and they ( their insurance company) paid me the amount I was asking for right then and there.
I wouldn't be surprised if the company's insurance would cover this.
I would not drop this!
Good luck!
OH, be sure to take photos of the tree they cut down, also if you have any photos of the tree before they cut it down , I would put those aside as well.
I like this idea....that way things are written down. I wish I could have some how taped that phone call, PrincessShmoo but I don't think we have that ability.
As far as my DH talking with the guy or even answering him........It was hard to get a word in!! The guy was talking WAY fast, totally beating around the bush and twisting info all around. DH is mild manner but it would have been hard to stop this guy in midstream!!
That's why I like the certified letter approach.
How does small claims court work, btw? Do you have to get a lawyer and all that?
Wrong. It's hornbook law that oral contracts are enforceable. You need to have more information before you can say there was no contract here.
Sent from my SCH-I800 using DISBoards
You are correct that an oral contract is valid but very hard to prove an oral contract. It comes down to a he said/she said argument in court thus why everything is in writing these days.
Personally I would not pay and make them replace the tree they took out.
I told DH we would just go with another tree removal for the other 3 dead pines and call it good.
Sometimes you have to pick your battles. At this point I'd consider it done and over just to get this whole thing finished.
Yes you could go after the other guy but since it seems it would cost about $300 to get the tree replaced I wouldn't bother. I don't think it would be worth my time and aggravation. But I would be posting on a FACEBOOK page, YELP, and Angie's list if the bad company has listings there.
The point is, it shouldn't cost her ANYTHING to get the tree replaced! He had no permission to be on the property, the owners were not present and did not give their consent, and his crew took down the wrong tree! Totally his error and he needs to fix it.
Yes it shouldn't cost them anything. Also it shouldn't require going to small claims court. It shouldn't have happened in the first place. It shouldn't require arguing with the tree company....
But we live in the real world and shouldn't doesn't mean that it doesn't happen. To me $300 isn't worth the hassle and aggravation that taking this guy to court would cause.
I know to some people it's the principle and worth doing anything to punish the bad actions of this guy. So the question is what type of person is the OP? Either way is fine but it's up to her to decide.