I was told that by the time I would be graduating most of the "Baby Boomer" teachers would be ready to retire . . . On this Dis boards alone I have noticed at least 3 posts regarding teaching and pretty much all of the comments have been negative towards it . . .
I think the information you heard about Baby Boomers was a little old. That was true for me when I started teaching in the early 90s: When I started teaching, MOST of my co-workers had been in their jobs 20-something years. MOST of them had children in college or already out in the workforce. MOST of them had been together in the department for years and years, and they were some great teachers! I stood out because I was so much younger. When I had my first child, they hadn't had a baby shower around school in so long that they threw me an embarassingly big party. And when I'd been working only a few years, the retirement parties start . . . and kept on going.
And for a while, we had a
very serious teacher shortage. With all those Baby Boomers leaving and the pay so seriously low (I made less than 20K when I started), teachers just weren't to be had. We started bringing in Visiting International Faculty (which was fun) and people from the business world with no teaching degrees (results were mixed, but mostly negative). As a result, we got some big raises (well, big is a moderate word), and with the promise of a little more money more top-notch young people chose teaching as a career.
Now I'm 44, and the age breakdown looks very different. VERY FEW teachers are older than me -- oh, you could find a handful, but overall it's not the gray-haired building in which I first started teaching. About 1/3 of the teachers are in my age bracket -- we're in the "oldest teacher" rung. Most of my co-workers are young, five years or less out of college. (Wedding showers and baby showers abound.) So I don't anticipate large numbers of retirement parties soon. I have 13 more years to teach. Around the time I retire, yes, a bunch of us will go together -- well, within a five year span.
Now, what I've just told you is all true for my county, a county known for good schools. If you move just one county over, you'll find a very different situation. We live near a big city that's known for bad schools. They have horrible teacher turn-over, and the best teachers leave their system and come to ours (or one of the other outlying counties). ANY teacher can get a job in that system, and they actually make more money than we do in my county -- but heaven help them. I know MANY teachers who started out there but got away as fast as they could.
However, down here in the South we still are in need of teachers. Why? Because we are growing. With the taxes, high cost of living, and lack of jobs, people can't afford to live up North anymore. Businesses are flocking this direction, and we're building schools like you wouldn't believe. As a result, we're hiring more and more out-of-state teachers. It would be unfair for me not to mention wages, of course. Teacher salaries in the South are much lower than those in the North, but then, our cost of living is also much lower.
Looking back over the years, I think it happened like this: Teaching is a mainly female job. Those women who were my first co-workers would've gone to college in the 60s. At that point, most women were still being largely shuffled into teaching, nursing, or secretarial work. But in the 70s women were encouraged to break away from those stereotypes -- and many of them did. To choose education was to be un-progressive, un-modern. That explains why there's sort of a "missing generation of teachers" a little older than me. By the time I came through college in the 80s, the theme was "you have a choice" -- women were not looked down upon for doing something traditional like teaching, though other options were perfectly acceptable too. At least that's how it appears to me.
And as for negativity about teaching . . . if you do complete your teaching degree, you're going to learn that not everyone is supportive of teachers. More people than you'd expect are downright negative and have the idea that teachers should be servants, willing to work for peanuts (you KNEW it wasn't going to pay well, didn't you?), and anything bad that happens is basically because teachers are all just lazy. These people will always exist, and all the facts in the world won't sway their opinions.
In closing, I'm glad I went into education. It's really one of those jobs that's a calling. Either you are a teacher, or you're not. You have to have the right personality. Although it hasn't paid nearly as well as other things I could've done, the schedule is mom-friendly and that's worth a great deal. Also, the one big financial benefit we have is our pension, though the new people coming in aren't getting the same deal that we old-folks have.
Before you continue your program of study, though, I'd advise you to investigate whether you're realistically going to be able to get a job in your area. Don't take people's word for it. Check and see how many jobs are posted. Also, consider getting on the substitute teacher list. That'll get you into schools and let you see for yourself the job situation. In my experience, most teachers (myself included) get their first job through student teaching or through substitute teaching; knowing someone through those methods is key.
If you and your fiance decide that you're going to move, look into the teaching situation in the part of the country you're considering. It's not the same everywhere, and you don't want to become qualified for a job that isn't realistically going to be available.