RoyalCanadian said:Yes the Muslims who both captured Jerusalem and built the Dome of the Rock were Arabs. That said, those same Arabs did not hang around Palestine forever. The Arabs have historically been a very nomadic people - moving from one locale to another. I don't blame them one bit for up and leaving Palestine -- many of them living in Damascus and Amman and acting as absentee landlords. The land of Palestine was anything but hospitable. The land that wasn't arid was malarial swamp.
The facts do stand -- they are not my own, but those of British demographic studies, Arab studies, Jewish studies -- there was not a long standing, stable Arab population in Palestine. Most of the Arabs living in Palestine in the early 20th century could only trace their lineage in the land to the time after the Egyptian capture of the land in the 1830s.
Your "1.2 million Arabs in Palestine" is an interesting number -- and I'd love to know the source of that number. There are so many numbers bandied about -- some including the Arabs living in the Transjordan Palestine and some just including the western part of Palestine. You are correct about the 600,000 Jews. However, it is wrong to assume that the 600,000 Jews were spread equally across Palestine in 1947 just as it is wrong to assume that the 1.2 million Arabs were spread equally across Palestine at that time. The areas partitioned by the United Nations for the Jews contained a majority population of Jews, and had contained a majority population for a significant period of time. The Jewish resettlement of Palestine is not just a recent event -- for there has been a Jewish presence in Palestine since biblical days.
As you have probably found out by now, figures are very hard to come by when it comes to the Middle East. Here's one site I've used that doesn't seem to have a political agenda:
http://www.mideastweb.org/palpop.htm
Not easy reading. However, I don't take issue with whether or not there 1.2 million Arabs or 1.1 million Arabs living in Palestine in 1948. Who really knows? Here's what I take issue with:
1) You seem to be peddling the idea that Palestine was a vast no-man's land. It was not. There were Arab homes, villages, and shops there. Not all were landless nomads.
2) On the face of it, your assertion that there was a Jewish presence in Palestine since biblical days is correct. There were other presences, but let's just stick with that one. So how does this translate into a claim of ownership for a modern day Zionist? On what basis does someone in Chicago claim the right to a home in Jerusalem when they've neither lived or even travelled there? Doubly so when the home they claim is already occupied by an Arab family and has been for 3 generations? That's the crux of the problem.
This could go on and on but it's irrelevant. All the facts and figures mean nothing. As one who saw the politics and conflicts up close and personal, my conclusion is logic left the building a long time ago. You can endlessly debate the minutia of each side and ultimately, you walk shaking your head at the utter stupidity of it all.
As far as the current conflict, once again, we're watching a giant squash an ant with A-bomb. I wish someone would please explain to me why the proper response to terrorist missiles hitting northern Israel requires bombing an international airport at least twice and staging hundreds of retaliatory raids against people who had nothing to do with the attack.


