Brina
Mouseketeer
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2005
- Messages
- 433
Hi,
This is my first post on this board, although I have been lurking for a while. My family is in the process of planning our second visit to WDW. Our first trip was when my twin boys were just shy of their 3rd birthday. We stayed at the contemporary. While not the most "disney" of resorts, we loved being on site of Chef Mickey's (where we ate 3 times) and, especially, being able to walk back and forth from MK when the boys were tired or cranky, or asleep in their strollers. On our coming trip, the boys will be 5.5 and our dd will be almost 3. We know that walking will not be an option with only one child in a stroller, as the additional walking, on top of all the MK walking, would just be too much.
We have narrowed our resort choices down to AKL or GF. Obviously, the attraction for each is very differnt than the other. The AKL is all about the animals. My kids, especially the boys, will love seeing all the animals, especially since we are considering staying on the conceirge level and will go on the sunrise and sunset safaries. The attraction to the GF is all about location. Being so close to the MK with 3 small children just seems like a wonderful luxury. I know that to get back to the resort involves going all the way around the circuit, as the monorail only goes in one direction, but the kids are so fascinated by the monorail, that it shouldn't be a problem.
I feel like I am comparing apples and oranges. Each resort has something that seems so special. The other night it occurred to me that perhaps we could just stay at both. Is there any downside (other than moving) to doing this? Is their a financial implication (ie, does the per night go down with longer stays, or is the cost per night set based upon season)? Will disney help you with the move, such as internal transfer of baggage or any such assistance?
If you have done a split stay, please let me know your experience.
Thanks
Brina
This is my first post on this board, although I have been lurking for a while. My family is in the process of planning our second visit to WDW. Our first trip was when my twin boys were just shy of their 3rd birthday. We stayed at the contemporary. While not the most "disney" of resorts, we loved being on site of Chef Mickey's (where we ate 3 times) and, especially, being able to walk back and forth from MK when the boys were tired or cranky, or asleep in their strollers. On our coming trip, the boys will be 5.5 and our dd will be almost 3. We know that walking will not be an option with only one child in a stroller, as the additional walking, on top of all the MK walking, would just be too much.
We have narrowed our resort choices down to AKL or GF. Obviously, the attraction for each is very differnt than the other. The AKL is all about the animals. My kids, especially the boys, will love seeing all the animals, especially since we are considering staying on the conceirge level and will go on the sunrise and sunset safaries. The attraction to the GF is all about location. Being so close to the MK with 3 small children just seems like a wonderful luxury. I know that to get back to the resort involves going all the way around the circuit, as the monorail only goes in one direction, but the kids are so fascinated by the monorail, that it shouldn't be a problem.
I feel like I am comparing apples and oranges. Each resort has something that seems so special. The other night it occurred to me that perhaps we could just stay at both. Is there any downside (other than moving) to doing this? Is their a financial implication (ie, does the per night go down with longer stays, or is the cost per night set based upon season)? Will disney help you with the move, such as internal transfer of baggage or any such assistance?
If you have done a split stay, please let me know your experience.
Thanks
Brina