this kind of thing can even come up with direct deposit. dh and i both worked for employers who had the same 'pay dates' and direct deposit was required of employees. one interpreted the law that they did their 'run' with the bank (in other words 'paid the employees') such that funds were deposited and AVAILABLE on the designated payday, the other interpreted that so long as they had done the run, if there was a weekend or holiday and the bank made the funds unavailable the employer was not responsible. it made friday paydates a pain-my employer did their run thursday nite so it was actualy available friday , dh's waited till friday so it was'nt available until monday (and if monday was a bank holiday, sometimes not till tuesday).
i think in california the only time a check or the cash equivilent to pay has to be in an employees hand on a certain day is when you terminate. failing to do so can result in the labor board requring the employer to pay full pay for each of the days an employee had to wait for it (this was why our payroll clerks always were the first to knew who was getting terminated-bypassed direct deposit entirely and had to have a hand issued check for the boss to deliver upon firing).
i think in california the only time a check or the cash equivilent to pay has to be in an employees hand on a certain day is when you terminate. failing to do so can result in the labor board requring the employer to pay full pay for each of the days an employee had to wait for it (this was why our payroll clerks always were the first to knew who was getting terminated-bypassed direct deposit entirely and had to have a hand issued check for the boss to deliver upon firing).
