Chris-Mo
Earning My Ears
- Joined
- Feb 21, 2016
- Messages
- 65
Typically, my long runs in the training plans are dictated by two things:
1) 150 min max for continuous runners and 180 min max (*) for run/walk runners. *I'm still figuring this one out, but the data I got from Marathon Weekend says this is pretty good.
2) Best case scenario: Long run is 25% or less of weekly mileage. Good scenario: Long run is 25-30% of weekly mileage. I'm willing to go to 35% on occasion. I don't like to go above 35% of weekly mileage unless I have to.
I have not written a plan for an ultra, but here's my view. The marathon is 99% aerobic. An ultra would be 100% aerobic. So at it's core there is no difference between marathon training and ultra training. Where the key difference comes is in the pacing. Pacing during the 50 mile event would require going relatively slow. While I have not tested this theory out, I believe a 150 min max long run could still work for 50 miler training. I think stacking multiple long efforts throughout the week is a better recipe for success than a single really long training run.
I agree with you. I have only done one 50 k and probably did not train appropriately but I was consistent completing each 25 K. The first half was about 3:10 and 3:15 on the second half. I was glad to be that consistent since the heat was very intense that day. I really tried to focus on pacing.
We have a friend that ran with me on that day and he has completed five 100 mile ultras. I believe he would agree with your assessment and if I understand his training it would resemble what you have described. His longest run is a 30 miler, he focuses on a series of 20 and 30 mile runs keeping weekly totals in check with his training. This is interesting to me. At some point if I ever finish this dissertation I am working on I may hit you for more ideas on such a training plan.