And one is more realistic for most women than the other. Nothing wrong with aging gracefully.
And one is more realistic for most women than the other. Nothing wrong with aging gracefully.
I know what it was. But it was poor costuming given the choreography.That was part of the second outfit. You noticed that she changed on stage?
This to the nth.I loved it- not even upset about the lip syncing because well, I think it would be hard to actually sing when you were giving such a high energy dance performance.
Not sure if anyone here has been to the beach lately, or watched figure skating on tv or gymnastics but I think the costumes last night were pretty similar.
Nobody was stripping, therefore that was not a stripper pole. It was a pole, and she did some gymnastic like dance moves on it.
The way Shakira held that rope I said to myself... "Thank you Lord for having Shakira use that rope and not a real snake." That is a pretty thick rope to tie into knots. Just sayin
It was the best half time show since Prince. I think Shakira could have carried it alone, but whatever.
ITA, it looked horrible. The black outfit shouldn't have had such a narrow cut. Totally looked like wings from a maxipad and wasn't very flattering.I know what it was. But it was poor costuming given the choreography.
Was Adam touching his privates? Was he opening his legs for the camera to the point where his testicles almost were exposed? Was he humping the air?Did you feel the same way when Adam Levine took his shirt off last year? If not, the problem wasn’t the performances...
Wow, just wow.Was Adam touching his privates? Was he opening his legs for the camera to the point where his testicles almost were exposed? Was he humping the air?
That kind of stuff is not family friendly. Here is my labia, Caged Children. Look at it. Now I'm going to touch my crotch. SING, children. Sing. The presence of a children on stage made this all so hysterical.
Lol! I have to admit, I secretly loved it. It was sick and twisted. But not something I would like to watch with children/teens.
ITA, it looked horrible. The black outfit shouldn't have had such a narrow cut. Totally looked like wings from a maxipad and wasn't very flattering.
That’s fair. On the other side though, I’ve been to concerts where the singer/band doesn’t dance and I was thoroughly entertained because there were a lot of pyrotechnics and other aspects going on. I personally don’t like watching someone dance and pretend to sing. It’s not entertaining to me. I want to hear what they actually sound like live. Everyone likes different things I guessWhat you like is a singer. Shakira and JLo are entertainers. Nothing wrong with preferring one over the other but there is a difference.
Personally, I prefer an entertainer. I can turn the radio on and hear them just sing. Just a difference in preference.
I really wasn't. I love big dance productions and I love good costuming, but one of the first things I noticed was the white/silver peaking out. It wasn't a good look and I'm surprised it got through all the dress and tech rehearsal without someone saying something. That bothered me more than the grabbing. She looked amazing when she took the black layer off.Not really. Only if you are looking for a way to be negative about the show.
Eh stripper pole is pretty much the name one calls it.I loved it- not even upset about the lip syncing because well, I think it would be hard to actually sing when you were giving such a high energy dance performance.
Not sure if anyone here has been to the beach lately, or watched figure skating on tv or gymnastics but I think the costumes last night were pretty similar.
Nobody was stripping, therefore that was not a stripper pole. It was a pole, and she did some gymnastic like dance moves on it.
The way Shakira held that rope I said to myself... "Thank you Lord for having Shakira use that rope and not a real snake." That is a pretty thick rope to tie into knots. Just sayin
It was the best half time show since Prince. I think Shakira could have carried it alone, but whatever.

I think we tend to see them be more strategic in their placement so it's more of a bigger reveal like "how was that under that" kind of thinking with a switchout of the costume. I can't say that it bothered me but I did notice. I hear what you're getting at though.I really wasn't. I love big dance productions and I love good costuming, but one of the first things I noticed was the white/silver peaking out. It wasn't a good look and I'm surprised it got through all the dress and tech rehearsal without someone saying something. That bothered me more than the grabbing. She looked amazing when she took the black layer off.
That’s fair. On the other side though, I’ve been to concerts where the singer/band doesn’t dance and I was thoroughly entertained because there were a lot of pyrotechnics and other aspects going on. I personally don’t like watching someone dance and pretend to sing. It’s not entertaining to me. I want to hear what they actually sound like live. Everyone likes different things I guess
You didn't see her grab her crotch multiple times? You didn't see her open her legs up wide for all to see? You didn't see her grind in a sexual manner?Wow, just wow.
I am not sure what show you were watching, but that wasn't the half time show I saw. Your mind must be a lot dirtier than mine and that is saying something.
Pink would be a fantastic act for the halftime show! Most of the concerts I’ve been to are rock bands and they get so into their music that I find it entertaining like when they jump off amps or have a drum set come out of the ground on a lift. I’ve been to concerts where they stand around like robots and agree that isn’t entertaining.I use country music performers as examples just because I have been to so many concerts. Will NOT pay to see George Strait or Alan Jackson again. They stand and sing. Now Garth Brooks, Tim McGraw, Reba, Keith Urban I will pay to see again and again because they entertain. Actually though none of them dance. But none lip sync either.
Same with someone like Pink. She is worth every dime. She is 100% an entertainer. But doesn’t lip sync.
Pyrotechnics aren’t entertaining to me.
You didn't see her grab her crotch multiple times? You didn't see her open her legs up wide for all to see? You didn't see her grind in a sexual manner?
Or she could have been covering what was a poorly tailored costume. She had a nude bodysuit on that was securely covering any private bits. She didn't "cover" that area at all once the black costume was off.She didn’t “grab” it. She put her hand over the area. I rewatched the performance just to be sure. Looked like she was making sure you didn’t see what too many are so sure she was trying to show.
Most shows on regular TV have a ton of a violence and death, and I don't hear any complaints about that or people worried about children watching these shows. PG-13 movies can include as much graphic violence as they want, but if there is someone naked for 1 second or the F word is used twice it's automatically rated R. I don't get it.So why is watching large muscular men slamming into each other violently for 3 hours ok, but watching a halftime show with some giggly bits not ok?
Heck, if you watched the Joe Theismann broken leg game, you got to see his leg bone, live on tv. That wasn't a Super Bowl, but it was football.