Got this high roller survey question today...

[_19disnA]

Most likely the Marketing dept has to get their budget approved by someone higher up in the company who won't think this is a good idea now. Marketing always thinks more $$ for advertising will result in more people/revenue/profit. Perhaps Marketing wanted to use the data from this survey is help justify their request.

 

[StormyCA]

I never knew it was a 'thing', either. DLR must not get too many 'takers' or I'd think it would be more widely 'known'.

Hmmm, $105.00 for parking at the Grand? I wouldn't do it if I had to pay the whole thing, but if I was going with a group of 4 or more I'd pay my share in a heartbeat. What's an extra $28.00 pp (w/tip) for such convenient parking? I wonder how one arranges it? They don't let you up the drive without checking for a reservation. Do you just say "I'd like to pay to valet park for the day?"

 

[DLgal]

I never knew it was a 'thing', either. DLR must not get too many 'takers' or I'd think it would be more widely 'known'.

Hmmm, $105.00 for parking at the Grand? I wouldn't do it if I had to pay the whole thing, but if I was going with a group of 4 or more I'd pay my share in a heartbeat. What's an extra $28.00 pp (w/tip) for such convenient parking? I wonder how one arranges it? They don't let you up the drive without checking for a reservation. Do you just say "I'd like to pay to valet park for the day?"

Yeah, I don't know. It seems like you need a good reason to pull up at the Grand and I feel like they could potentially be overwhelmed by cars if they advertised $105/day Theme Park Valet parking there. On a normal day, you have to wait about 20 minutes to get your car from valet (we use it when we eat at Napa Rose), so I can't imagine how much worse it would be if people were using it for theme park parking as well.

I really don't think this is a path they want to go down...