Happened to catch a little of a radio program and the guy was talking about the BoyScout official that plead guilty in a case of child porn. The files included photographs and videos of boys younger than 12 exposing themselves and engaging in sexual acts, the documents showed.
The radio guy (Mike Gallagher) went on to say that this instance underscores how right the BoyScouts are in forbidding openly gay men to serve as scout masters. Said that a gay man shouldn't be a mentor for a young boy and of course he was sure that everyone would agree with this.
I'd have been tempted to call if it hadn't been a rebroadcast
I can't get this logic at all. Should heterosexual men be banned from positions where they would be mentor to young girls?
These are pediphiles, doesn't matter which they prefer girls or boys. Yes, I think an open pedophile shouldn't be a mentor for children and I wouldn't allow my child anywhere around them but gay does not equal pedophile. To me there is no connection.
Do you think this case helps demonstrate why the Boy Scouts have this rule or does it just prove that it really hasn't made a difference?
The radio guy (Mike Gallagher) went on to say that this instance underscores how right the BoyScouts are in forbidding openly gay men to serve as scout masters. Said that a gay man shouldn't be a mentor for a young boy and of course he was sure that everyone would agree with this.
I'd have been tempted to call if it hadn't been a rebroadcast
I can't get this logic at all. Should heterosexual men be banned from positions where they would be mentor to young girls?
These are pediphiles, doesn't matter which they prefer girls or boys. Yes, I think an open pedophile shouldn't be a mentor for children and I wouldn't allow my child anywhere around them but gay does not equal pedophile. To me there is no connection.
Do you think this case helps demonstrate why the Boy Scouts have this rule or does it just prove that it really hasn't made a difference?


