WOW... I sure see alot of "I" "I" "I" in your posts...
This was very unnecessary. The reason there were a lot of "I's" in my post was because
I was asked a specific question about why
I felt the way
I do about DVC.
There would be no reason for me to speak on behalf of anyone else when I'm merely stating my opinion, when specifically asked for it by another poster, therefore there's no reason to substitute any other pronoun.
In this case, there's a very good reason for the use of one particular pronoun. Noting the full context of all posts would be wise before criticizing someone's choice of words.
Also, a lot of posters in this thread (yes, I just read through the whole thing

) seem to think that some of us here, who responded to the
OP's choice to insert DVC into the argument with the very first post in this thread, are criticizing DVC
members. Speaking for myself, I have no problems with DVC
members, and even sometimes wish I was one, but that is separate from my dislike for some aspects of the DVC itself. I won't go into those again, since they've been discussed ad infinitum in here and elsewhere, but I just want to make sure people aren't reading
dislike of DVC members, when people are merely discussing problems they have with the DVC itself.
The OP, IMO, should have just left any mention of DVC out of the original
free dining post, since it had nothing to do with the point of the post, and did make the OP come across as having a bit of an entitled mentality.
BUT the OP has proved to be, as a previous poster mentioned, very intelligent in subsequent posts and not at all the way that first post made the OP sound. In fact, we ended up having a really good discussion later on about what really seems to be a bigger problem with WDW restaurants than free dining: the poorly implemented and executed ADR system, which provides no disincentive for abusing ADR's at most restaurants.