Angel Ariel
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- May 1, 2006
- Messages
- 8,292
Yep it is...and the DLR change will be different than the change at WDW, which IMO is a good change for DLR 

I just saw on Mouseplanet that FP is coming to Matterhorn and Pirates. I didn't know those were coming. It does make sense if they are bringing over FP+.
I am in the boat that I hope it is same day/in park only. Otherwise I feel the system will be overloaded by locals who *might* be stopping by later.
I just saw on Mouseplanet that FP is coming to Matterhorn and Pirates. I didn't know those were coming. It does make sense if they are bringing over FP+.
I saw that, too. Let's think this through. For those of you who see DL on a weekend or a busy summer day/holiday, where does the POTC line usually end up? That's right - all over the walkway and even onto the bridge. So let's introduce FP+, take out one line and turn the other 30-40 minute line into a 60+ minute line. The new POTC line should now push into Hungry Bear Restauarant.
As for the Matterhorn, putting in a FP line will now make the standby go from 30-45 minutes to 45-60 minutes. That line already wraps around the whole friggin mountain. Will the line now be forced to spill into the parade route near Alice? Or will it just double back and cause the walkway between the Matterhorn and Nemo to be an even tighter squeeze? Sorry, DL this move just doesn't make sense.
Vote no for FP+ at DL.
Can someone explain to my why FP+ makes standby longer? I noticed that has been the case at WDW but I don't really understand why that happens.
Josh at EasyWDW and TouringPlans have both done extensive research and posts to show the impact FP+ has had on crowds. Their reports also took attendance into account.I also find it confusing that increased standby line times are being blamed on FP+. I understand that when there are two queues loading, with the FP line being given priority, then the standby line will necessarily wait at certain points to allow clumps from that shorter line to go ahead. But if there were only one queue, then wouldn't all of the people in the FP line also be in the standby line, which would result in roughly the same wait time overall?
Also, because this piqued my curiosity, I looked up historical attendance data for WDW (this table is aggregated data from the Themed Entertainment Association's annual reports). According to that table, between 2011 (pre-FP+) and 2014 (FP+ implemented), yearly attendance at the Magic Kingdom alone rose by more than two million people. That is an averaged attendance increase of more than 5,000 people per day in the MK. Isn't that a more likely explanation for increased wait times?
Josh at EasyWDW and TouringPlans have both done extensive research and posts to show the impact FP+ has had on crowds. Their reports also took attendance into account.
People blaming FP & FP+ for extended standby times obviously don't remember the 3+ hour long lines for marquee rides like Splash Mountain in the days prior to fastpass.
People blaming FP & FP+ for extended standby times obviously don't remember the 3+ hour long lines for marquee rides like Splash Mountain in the days prior to fastpass.