eliza61
DIS Legend
- Joined
- Jun 2, 2003
- Messages
- 21,023
THANK YOU! Although I'm a DVC member... not everyone can afford or chooses to stay on property. Some people don't have the luxury of going to Disney for a week or so. Many people can't afford, especially currently, to stay in a Deluxe resort. It does sound like a 'class system' if they are given FP's or whatever over other guests. A family that stays at a Value Resort isn't as valuable? They may spend the same amount of money but just in a differnt way.
I can't imagine what the threads will be like if Disney goes to charging for a FP system. God help us!![]()
Why? seriously? If you can't afford a mercedes should chrystler daminer (sp) offer discounts until you can?
Disney already does this. If you don't stay on site you are not supposed to use the resort pools. If I'm a guest staying at the Beach club, yeah I'm may be a bit peeved if off site guest can use the facilities I'm paying for.
In a free market system there are places I can't afford to go. If I'm staying at the Motel 6, I would never expect the perks that one gets at the Ritz carlton. If I'm flying coach, I never expect the perks that first class flyers get. They get those perks as a condition of spending that cash.
Remember the uproar when Disney built the BLT? One of the perks of being an owner was you got to view the fireworks from the special viewing lounge. Not sure what the outcome of that was but I had absolutely no problem with it.
doesn't Universal already do this and there seems to be no uproar over it. It's an incentive.
) and on a night we had a post-closing dinner at a monorail resort the resort line was running until 10 after an 8pm MK close. If they'd stuck to the original statement I think the upset would have persisted longer, but as it stands it appears that they scaled back the hours to a sort of middle ground. 


