Whatever to happened to motorized wheelchairs? Why did ECVs become so popular?
Also, if an ECV owner injures someone, are they not liable just as you'd be in a car accident?
I think there should be seperate, roped off lanes for ECV's only, like a bike lane.This would solve the problem for both groups. No kids getting mown down by ECV's and no one jumppingin front of an ECV.
Two problems, just off the top of my head. First, if you have these paths, how/where do the guests on wheels then access the various attractions, stores, restaurants, bathrooms...without separate branch paths?I don't know about banning them but they should have a seperate lane of traffic that the ECV's have to remain in and not let them ride where people are walking. They should not be there motoring along right with people who are walking! They should also have them set to much much slower speed-perhaps if they were set to "crawl" the people would be able to stop in time!
This is getting nasty over difference of opinion and lack of understanding of others' needs. To say ECVs should be banned is like saying small children should be banned from the parks.
Yes, there are people who abuse ECVs ranging from those who are just plain lazy to those who have no sense of responsibility. There are also those walk right in front of them (as well as other pedestrians) who either think they're more important or just aren't paying to attention to the area around them.
Wheelchairs and strollers are just as dangerous as ECVs when people don't care or pay attention.
Snip
An ECV isn't a motor vehicle, it's a motorized vehicle. You'd need to license power chairs, electric scooters, etc., as well. I don't know where you live, or what the procedure is for Federal laws (and they taught Civics when I was in school!) but in my state, all you need to do to get a bill introduced is ask your legislator to file it.You need a licence to drive a car or a motorcycle. Why is it unreasonable to require a licence to drive an ECV in public? If that were to pass into legislation, then any person (able-bodied or physically challenged) would need to take a test to drive an ECV.
So here is a thought:
In order to rent an ECV, you need to have a dr's prescription or a disability card or placard for your car. Then the people who need them can get them and the others won't. (I'm sure the rental company would hate this as it would stifle their business)
And as far as ADA goes, I believe they only have to make the facilities handicap accessible, they do not have to allow ECVs.
Now THIS is a good idea. Thank you. It wouldn't stop people's toes fom being smashed, but it would help people from being hit and hurt by them. The ECV that hit my son was going too fast. I get outraged over this.
I'm sorry, but an ECV will do far more damage than a stroller 99% of the time. The ECV is heavier and carries far more force than an ordinary stroller. The wheelchair is somewhere between the stroller and ECV for force and damage.
Even experienced scooter drivers can cause serious crashes and injuries. My father has a scooter, and he wiped out my son in the Orlando airport when he got confused and hit the accelerator the wrong way.
My spouse and I have joked about "ambulatory week" -- a special week where each park has one wheel-free day. No strollers, no wheelchairs, no ECVs. It's only a joke, but it comes from real frustrations from being clipped and rammed by others.
Maybe things would improve if Disney made out accident reports for these incidents and people were informed that they ARE liable for any injuries they cause while driving. Hmmm... sounds like a good fact pattern for an exam question....
I'm sorry, but an ECV will do far more damage than a stroller 99% of the time. The ECV is heavier and carries far more force than an ordinary stroller. The wheelchair is somewhere between the stroller and ECV for force and damage.
Even experienced scooter drivers can cause serious crashes and injuries. My father has a scooter, and he wiped out my son in the Orlando airport when he got confused and hit the accelerator the wrong way.
My spouse and I have joked about "ambulatory week" -- a special week where each park has one wheel-free day. No strollers, no wheelchairs, no ECVs. It's only a joke, but it comes from real frustrations from being clipped and rammed by others.
Maybe things would improve if Disney made out accident reports for these incidents and people were informed that they ARE liable for any injuries they cause while driving. Hmmm... sounds like a good fact pattern for an exam question....
Someone mentioned earlier about crossing guards....as a joke, perhaps.
I just wanted to comment--after 2 full marathons at Disney--one thing is certain...even with CM's guarding walkways to keep runners safe and allowing folks to pass when it is safe--guests do not like to listen. They cannot have their plans held up just so that someone can not be injured or not cause injury to others.
While it would be a decent idea to have designated lanes--that will last all of 2 seconds because there are guests who just don't care and will ignore signage because they must get to Expedition Everest NOW.
(Yes--jerky guests crossed in my path and I had to be evasive to avoid collision which would have injured ME and them. But at least they made their fast pass time 15 seconds sooner.)
Those that say Disney can't make any kind of accomodations for scooter paths that may only be because they haven't tried. Remember, the scooter problem is a relatively new problem. When the Disney parks were built they clearly had no idea that scooters would some day take over the pathways but here you are.
You know how they tape off areas all along the edge so people can watch the parades? Take that same system and use it to create paths for motorized vehicles. On each side of the path. Scooters would have to travel one direction in one lane and the other direction in the other lane. LOL
I think the problem with scooters and strollers is how hidden they are in a crowd. Several years ago I saw a really neat childs stroller with the seat a couple of feet higher than they normally are. The childs head was about adult waist level or a bit higher. The little guy was no longer at butt level and was clearly happier and able to be seen by others. Very easy to avoid his stroller. Would scooters benefit from a redesign I wonder?
I just wonder what the solution is. We're simply going to see more and more of them in the parks so the powers that be should really consider dealing with the issue now before it does get worse.
Two problems, just off the top of my head. First, if you have these paths, how/where do the guests on wheels then access the various attractions, stores, restaurants, bathrooms...without separate branch paths?
Second, it doesn't work. The Land already has a wheelchair path. It's one of three walkways in/out of the building: the one on the right is the entrance for guests on foot, the one on the left is the exit, and the one to the immediate right of that is the clearly marked wheelchair ramp.
It doesn't stop people from walking up or down it, sometimes several abreast; or from getting annoyed when they encounter a guest on wheels.
This is the real problem. I'm beginning to believe that nearly every person at Disney is convinced that the entire park has been placed there JUST FOR THEM. All these other people are merely obstacles placed in the way of their good time.
The other thing...what the heck happened to compassion in this country?? Holy smoke, I have read and heard more rotten things said about "everybody else that isn't me" lately than I can remember. As a group, we seem to have lost the ability to share anything or to even think about envisioning what someone else might be dealing with in their life.
Take a step back, look at your blessings and be thankful for them! Be thankful that you are able to afford a trip to Disney in this economy! Be thankful that you have the ability to get around on your own! Be thankful that someone invented the ECV so you could do things you never could before! Be thankful that your kids are grown and you don't have to watch them every second. Be thankful that your kids are young and still think it's ok to hold Mom and Dad's hand in the parks, or that you can still hold them in your arms. Look around you at the other people who are there to enjoy the same things you are and be thankful for Walt and all the other people who made it all happen so you could all be there.
Maybe if we all thought about how lucky we really are, we might start to treat each other a little better.
If he was in line to get the bag checked then it was NOT a Disney ECVEveryone the boy was not moving. He was in front of his Mom while waiting for her bag to be checked.
He wasn't running around like a crazy man.
He was a little boy that was hit from behind by an ECV with a very large woman driving it. The woman's weight plus the weight of the ECV I'm sure did some major damage.
She plowed into him, I'm sure not on purpose.
I don't know if it was a Disney rental or not. I do know it was very large. Headlights, baskets loaded down with items.
He was hurt and we were looking for some feed back from a friend or family member.
I could be wrong, but I'm pretty sure that that would violate the ADA.
The general gist of the ADA (as it pertains to this) is that modifications must be made to allow someone with a disability to enjoy the park (or whatever) in an equal way to someone without a disability AND that the park (or whatever) cannot ask for proof of said disability.
So, if someone cannot walk (or says that they cannot walk), an ECV would be the appropriate modification and WDW cannot ask for proof of need.
Nor can they force people to take a test to use the ECV (though I do agree that it would help reduce accidents). The analogy to driving a car (and needing a test for it) fails because everyone needs to take a test to drive a car. Only ECV drivers would need to take a test to enter WDW, since they cannot enter without an ECV (or, rather, would not be able to do anything at WDW without an ECV) and would be forced to take the test to use an ECV.