A 10% is unsustainable. A few years of that and most of us will be selling before we get to the point where we have to pay someone to get the contract.
The 10% is more for me to budget as I hate having to take more money than I had put aside for things like this.
A 10% is unsustainable. A few years of that and most of us will be selling before we get to the point where we have to pay someone to get the contract.
The 10% is more for me to budget as I hate having to take more money than I had put aside for things like this.
That's why so many of us work diligently to get enough Disney gift cards to pay dues. It keeps the Wolf from the door for another year. It's just that it's not always easy to find about $5000 worth of discounted cards and it's also not easy to keep up with them.
The cost is static but it 'seems as if' paying with mouse money makes it less real.
SAP = points for use exclusively or primarily outside of the homes resort
SAP+ = points that will often be used outside of the home resort, but for which there is a desirable/advantageous reason to own at that resort as well
Classic examples of pure SAP would be OKW or SSR - don't need home resort priority there for most rooms, most of the time.
SAP+ examples might be CCV/BLT/VGF/PVB - pretty cheap dues, but there are also rooms there for which home resort priority can be pretty important and desirable.
Most wouldn't put VGC/VDH/BWV/BCV in a SAP+ category because those points typically make the most sense to use exclusively at their home resort.
Of course, it is also somewhat subjective to the individual whether they view something as SAP+